Search This Blog

Sunday, January 11, 2015

Daily Stormer

Daily Stormer


Millions March in France to Denounce Terrorism and Promote Unity or Whatever

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 07:21 PM PST

Lee Rogers
Daily Slave
January 12, 2014

paris-march

Why are these people not demanding that all Moslems be removed from their country?

Millions throughout France came out in the streets this weekend for a march to denounce terrorism and promote unity or something. The march was promoted by the French government and Jew run media outlets as a response to the Paris attacks by Moslem gunmen.

The problem is obvious, but the French government and the Jew run media want us to believe that this is some sort of complicated problem that requires complicated solutions. They are claiming that the problem is some sort of vague type of extremism without linking it to any one group of people. Therefore they claim we need to have thousands of riot police in the streets, spy on people’s communications and destroy privacy rights to fight said extremism.

Clearly, the vast majority of these attacks are carried about by Moslems. That much should be obvious to everyone. Therefore the problem is with Islam and the fact that it represents an ideology that is totally incompatible with Western countries. It has been this way for centuries. Therefore, it would make sense to remove these huge populations of Moslems from White European nations.

It is true that some of these attacks may have been financed by intelligence organizations like the Mossad and the CIA but that doesn’t change the fact that large numbers of Moslems should not be in Europe. By default, the threat of these types of attacks would be greatly reduced without large minority populations of Moslems in our countries. How difficult is this to figure out? Why is it that anyone having this view is demonized as some evil “Nazi” or “racist?” This is just basic common sense.

Instead, we are told that we have to bomb countries full of Moslems while simultaneously letting Moslems live inside White European countries. This is the most insane policy you can imagine and we are seeing the results of it. The alleged war on terror has only created a larger number of angry Moslems and rightfully so. Wouldn’t you be mad if an invading force came in and started killing your people? The only group of people this type of policy benefits are Jews who have sought to undermine the racial cohesion of all White European cultures since World War II. We see this with their non-stop promotion of subversive multicultural propaganda, race mixing and open border policies. They’re basically trying to get White Europeans and Moslems who they perceive as racial enemies to fight each other for their own benefit. This is why separation is the only real solution.

The French people should be denouncing Islam and demanding every Moslem be removed from their country immediately. Then they should demand a ban of all Jews from their country since it was Jew promoted policies that allowed such a situation to occur in the first place. The good news is that the war criminal Jew leader of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu is inviting French Jews to immigrate to Israel. I sincerely hope they take him up on his offer.

To conclude, this pathetic attempt by the French government and the Jew run media to misdirect people’s attention from what the real problem is will fail miserably.

Ratfaced Monster Bill Maher Criticizes His “Tribe” for Censoring Criticism of Islam

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 07:18 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer

January 12, 2015

The rafaced Jewish monster Bill Maher appeared on Humpty-Dumpty Live to discuss the Paris Massacre and gave some of his thoughts on the Jew approach to dealing with Moslems.

Maher talked about how ridiculous it was that these men were killed for the “for the crime of drawing cartoons,” but the last person (that I am aware of) to be killed for cartoons was killed by the same snakes who killed Christ – Julius Streicher was executed – hanged, in fact – at the Nuremberg trials for drawing cartoons of Jews.

An anti-Jew cartoon from Streicher's Der Sturmer.

An anti-Jew cartoon from Streicher’s Der Sturmer.

I am just going to assume that the sickening parasite Maher would not argue that Streicher’s murder was even wrong, let alone as bad as the Charlie Hebdo massacre, even though it was literally the exact same thing.

Maher then criticized his “tribe” – which he said was “liberals” but is actually baby-killing Jews – for censoring criticism of Islam.  He is certainly correct that the Jew terrorists try and shut down criticism of Islam, but there are also many militant rats who push “kill all Moslems” type memes.

As always, the Jews are on both sides of everything, to ensure they control discussion and push things where they want them to go, but this difference in rhetoric usually relates to domestic vs. foreign policy – all Moslems in Western countries are innocent victim vibrant lambs, while all Moslems in the countries which neighbor Israel are vicious murderers who must be killed as children lest they grow up to commit another Shoah.

Mahar is taking a slightly variant third position, a somewhat retro Jew position: that Moslems need to convert to Atheism and join the cult of faggotry and feminism.  He does not believe Moslems should be banned from entering Western countries as immigrants, he just believes they need to be indoctrinated against their own religion more once they arrive.

All three positions are obviously wrong.  My positions: Moslems are a serious problem in the West, in their own countries who cares what they do it’s their own business.  Maher’s third position is just dumb, as the history of Islam in France has shown Moslems won’t adopt secular liberalism in any significant numbers no matter how hard you push them.

The evil looking weasel Maher apparently continued his comments on his own show later on, but I can’t stand to watch anymore of this guy or even hear his whining Jew voice.  Here is that show, for those interested.

Another Pro-White Billboard in Alabama!

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 06:43 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 12, 2015

Very nice.

Very nice.

Again, Birmingham, Alabama is hosting a pro-White billboard. This one is superior ot the “Anti-Racist is Code-Word for Anti-White” billboard which had previously gone up, containing the much less confusing phrase “Diversity Means Chasing Down the Last White Person.”

The billboard is posted along the scenic I-59 near Springville in St. Clair county.

Local media covering the situation explicitly referred to the White Genocide Project.

AL:

The billboard appears similar to one posted near Leeds in June 2013 which read “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.” Though the billboard was within Birmingham city limits, Leeds mayor David Miller denounced that billboard’s “racist message” at the time due to its proximity to the city.

Both phrases are commonly used by the White Genocide Project, a group of white supremacist and separatist online activists. Their website refers to both slogans as “repeater phrases,” words and sentences activists are encouraged to use often.

The White Genocide Project is also connected to the “swarm,” and the groups follow the “Mantra,” written by a segregationist named Robert Whitaker.

These billboards are such a great way to spread the message, and we need to support them.

If anyone is working on getting one up through crowd-funding, let us know and we’ll do what we can to publicize the campaign.

Note: At time of writing, there are over 2,000 comments on the AL.com article about the billboard, most of them positive.  You may want to go show your support.

Jonathan Chait and the End of Liberal Society in the West

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 06:31 PM PST

Kevin MacDonald
Occidental Observer
January 12, 2015

"Goyim, I..." -Jonathan Chait

“Goyim, I…” -Jonathan Chait

The Charles Hebdo affair presents a difficult dilemma to liberals and the left in general. Typically, they have no problem with censorship of views they don't like. They jump on board campaigns to fire college professors for publishing about race differences or White dispossession, and they shed no tears when some poor soul in the media gets fired for blurting out something about Jewish power in Hollywood. They would love for such people to go to prison.

But they want to think of themselves as principled and high-minded. So what to say about the murderous attempt to shut down Charlie Hebdo?

Here's what Jonathan Chait says in New York magazine:

Let us stipulate for the sake of argument that Charlie Hebdo is crude and even racist. Freedom of expression is not a strong defense of crude, racist, or otherwise stupid expression. Indeed, one of the most common and least edifying defenses made by people who have proffered offensive opinions is that they have the right to free speech. The right of expression is not the issue when the objection centers on the content.

This last comment—that "the right of expression is not the issue when the objection centers on the content"— reflects Chait's intellectual arrogance about the dogmas of liberalism — that for example,  there is no such thing as race, but if there is, genetic differences are irrelevant to average group differences in IQ or any other trait important for success in the contemporary world, etc. From his point of view, these dogmas are set in stone and massively supported by scientific data. So it's perfectly legitimate to exclude people who dissent from these dogmas from having any voice in the mainstream media, and exert pressure to get them fired them from their jobs or put them in jail.

And Chait, as a prominent contributor to the elite media, is well aware that he is in a great position to do exactly that. 

But that's not what's at issue here. Charlie Hebdo is obviously not attempting to be intellectually rigorous, and poking holes in its content would be child's play. Their content is indefensible. So why tolerate Charlie Hebdo when you are unwilling to tolerate James Watson or Jason Richwine?

The approved answer is that we must stand up for Charlie Hebdo because they have been threatened with violence. Here Chait relies on Ross Douthat in the New York Times:

The kind of blasphemy that Charlie Hebdo engaged in had deadly consequences, as everyone knew it could … and that kind of blasphemy is precisely the kind that needs to be defended, because it's the kind that clearly serves a free society's greater good. If a large enough group of someones is willing to kill you for saying something, then it's something that almost certainly needs to be said, because otherwise the violent have veto power over liberal civilization, and when that scenario obtains it isn't really a liberal civilization any more. Again, liberalism doesn't depend on everyone offending everyone else all the time, and it's okay to prefer a society where offense for its own sake is limited rather than pervasive. But when offenses are policed by murder, that's when we need more of them, not less, because the murderers cannot be allowed for a single moment to think that their strategy can succeed.

In this sense, many of the Western voices criticizing the editors of Hebdo have had things exactly backward: Whether it's the Obama White House or Time Magazine in the past or the Financial Timesand (God help us) the Catholic League today, they've criticized the paper for provoking violence by being needlessly offensive and "inflammatory" (Jay Carney's phrase), when the reality is that it's precisely the violence that justifies the inflammatory content. In a different context, a context where the cartoons and other provocations only inspired angry press releases and furious blog comments, I might sympathize with the FT's Tony Barber when he writes that publications like Hebdo "purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims, but are actually just being stupid." (If all you have to fear is a religious group's fax machine, what you're doing might not be as truth-to-power-ish as you think.) But if publishing something might get you slaughtered and you publish it anyway, by definition you are striking a blow for freedom, and that's precisely the context when you need your fellow citizens to set aside their squeamishness and rise to your defense.

Whereas far too often in the West today the situation is basically reversed: People will invoke free speech to justify just about any kind of offense or provocation or simple exploitation ("if we don't go full-frontal seven times on 'Game of Thrones' tonight, man, the First Amendment dies"), and then scurry for cover as soon as there's a whiff of actual danger, a hint that "bold" envelope-pushing might require actual bravery after all.

Jonathan Chait's take away message from this manages to include the inference that Jews, having been victims of laws against blasphemy during the Inquisition, naturally believe in "liberalism and liberty":

Must all deliberate offense-giving, in any context, be celebrated, honored, praised? I think not. But in the presence of the gun — or, as in the darker chapters of my own faith's history, the rack or the stake — both liberalism and liberty require that it be welcomed and defended.

The problem with this is that there is a very large area between fax machines and murder — like being fired from one's job or going to prison for saying things liberals don't like. These are very serious costs to contemplate before expressing one's well-founded opinions, and when a society allows such costs, as pretty much every Western society does in one form or another, it is just as much an attempt to have "veto power over liberal civilization" as murder and threats of murder.

Liberal civilization disappeared in the West along with the increased power of the left. In the U.S., organizations like the ADL and the SPLC have lobbied for and supported thought crime legislation. And they have pressured governments and private companies to fire those with opinions they dislike. Throughout the West, it's the same story, with a central role for Jewish activist organizations (e.g., Guillaume Durocher on France, Andrew Joyce on the UK, Brenton Sanderson on Australial; myself on the U.S. and Canada).

So imagine this paraphrase of Douthat's central point:

The kind of blasphemy that Prof. James Watson and Jason Richwine (and many others) engaged in had the consequence that they were fired, as everyone knew it could … and that kind of blasphemy is precisely the kind that needs to be defended, because it's the kind that clearly serves a free society's greater good. If a large enough group of someones is willing to fire you for saying something, then it's something that almost certainly needs to be said, because otherwise the censorious have veto power over liberal civilization, and when that scenario obtains it isn't really a liberal civilization any more. Again, liberalism doesn't depend on everyone offending everyone else all the time, and it's okay to prefer a society where offense for its own sake is limited rather than pervasive. But when offenses are policed by devastating economic sanctions to one's livelihood, that's when we need more of them, not less, because the SPLC and the ADL cannot be allowed for a single moment to think that their strategy can succeed.

But don't expect Chait — or Douthat or the rest of the mainstream media — to get on board with that. Remember, censorship on the basis of content is just fine unless someone wants to actually kill you for saying it. Anything short of murder is just fine—an ideology that certainly satisfies the interests of contemporary Western elites who control the media and are able to exert effective economic pressure on dissidents. As noted, in Francis Carr Begbie's article, there are very different mechanisms utilized by elites and non-elites for censoring public discourse.

But make no mistake. Liberal civilization in the West has been destroyed, and its destruction was carried out by the same people who now congratulate themselves for having reasoned, enlightened views on free speech.

France: Media Touts Moslem Negro as Jew-Saving Hero During Hostage Situation

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 06:15 PM PST

Marcus Cicero
Daily Stormer
January 12, 2015

Lassana Bathily, a confused Black from the African nation of Mali, was likely only looking to pilfer free kosher briskets, or engage in hidden "muh dik" during the incident.

Lassana Bathily, a confused Black turned “hero” from the African nation of Mali, was likely only looking to pilfer free kosher briskets, or engage in hidden “muh dik” with his charges during the incident.

Just days after the Moslem rampage in the heart of Paris, the Jewish-dominated media has come out with a bizarre story attempting to resurrect the reputation of the parasitic apes running amok across France, and Europe in general.

According to those present at the hostage operation at a Jew market last week, the testimony of whom must be taken with a grain of salt, a twenty-four year old Moslem Negro deserves full credit for saving lives; allegedly aiding more than a dozen nation-wrecking foreign entities in hiding from another Black gone feral.

Jews across social media outlets were quick to praise the, “good little Monkey Goy,” for his actions; with the call for millions more of his brethren to move from their African nests almost sure to follow.

Haaretz:

Quick thinking by a Muslim employee may have saved the lives of 15 customers in the kosher supermarket in Paris during a deadly terrorist attack on Friday, Buzzfeed reports.

When the Islamist gunman broke into the store, Lassana Bathily, a 24-year-old Muslim from the African country of Mali, told customers to hide in the store’s basement freezer.

Closing the freezer’s doors, he told the customers to wait calmly inside while he keeps a lookout. After police raided the supermarket and killed gunman Amedy Coulibaly, the hostages emerged safely from the freezer.

For those who consistently argue that news organizations distort the truth of affairs occurring on a daily basis, this is a perfect example of how this is done, minus the other theories that need not even be discussed at the moment.

A story, whether it involves Jews or not, that should result in the condemnation of all freeloading creatures incompatible with White Western society, now turns into a love-fest for the same subspecies partially responsible for the increasing collapse of European peace.

Only in these troubling modern times can we imagine such a scenario playing itself out; actions that would have shocked those living just a few generations ago.

It seems as if only further failures and suffering on the part of those promoting this nonsense, guaranteed in the current atmosphere, will suffice to turn folks away from the nightmare of diversity.

This is what you have in store, Europe. The last crisis, exactly 2.7 times more fatal than the "holocaust," will pale in comparison to what will be next.

This is what you have in store, Europe. The last crisis, exactly 2.7 times more fatal than the “holocaust,” will pale in comparison to what will be next.

Related:

Blacks were saving Jews left and right during the Holocaust.

Support for Anti-Islamic Freedom Party in the Netherlands Surges

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 05:42 PM PST

Daily Slave
January 12, 2015

wilders

Geert Wilders – Dutch nationalist of the Freedom Party.

It is unfortunate to say this, but there is no question that the Paris attacks have been very good for European nationalist parties.  One example of this is with the anti-Islamic Freedom Party in the Netherlands.  The nationalist party led by Geert Wilders would be the largest political party in the Netherlands if elections were held today according to new polling data.

Reuters:

Support for the anti-Islamic Freedom Party of Dutch populist Geert Wilders has jumped to its highest level in more than a year after the Islamist militant attacks in Paris.

Wilders, known for his inflammatory rhetoric, said after the Paris bloodshed that the West was “at war” with Islam, drawing a rebuke from Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte on Sunday.

If elections were held now, his party would be the single largest in the Netherlands, with 31 seats in the 150-member parliament, more than twice as many as it won in the last elections, according to a Sunday poll.

This trend is only going to continue.  These attacks are making White Europeans all over the continent ask some very simple questions about all of this Cultural Marxist crap that they’ve been fed.  There is simply no logical reason why large numbers of Muslims have been allowed into their countries.  More and more people are going to demand their removal.  It is the only solution to this problem.

Black Home-Invader Sentenced for Murdering White Man and Shooting 3 Others

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 05:34 PM PST

KCTV 5
January 12, 2015

515c5d4657256.preview-300

Aaron Markarian was murdered by Blacks when his home was invaded by them.

A 22-year-old Kansas City man was sentenced today to 30 years in prison for the 2013 murder of a University of Missouri-Kansas City student, Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker announced Friday.

Alonzo D. Ruff, pleaded guilty in October in the killing of Aaron Markarian, as well as the shootings of three other people during a home invasion in which money and cell phones were taken from the victims. The incident occurred March 21, 2013, inside a home near UMKC, just south of the Country Club Plaza.

6408068_G

Alonzo D. Ruff has been sentenced to thirty years, after pleading guilty to the murder.

Ruff pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, three counts of assault, robbery and five counts of armed criminal action. Prosecutors agreed to seek a maximum sentence of 30 years.

On Friday, Jackson County Judge Robert Schieber sentenced Ruff to 30 years on each count and set the sentences to run concurrently.

A codefendant in the case has yet to go to trial.

Sign Here to Help Keep a Black Serial Rapist Away from White Women

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 05:05 PM PST

19 Action News
January 12, 2015

6390718_G

Keep serial-rapist Willie Lagway behind bars.

Summit County Prosecuting Attorney Sherri Bevan Walsh is asking for your help to keep Willie Lagway in prison. The Ohio Parole Board is considering Lagway’s release at a parole board hearing in February.

From February 10-14, 1983, Lagway, 27, went on a five-day crime spree victimizing six women in Summit County. Willie Lagway kidnapped two friends walking to a car in a parking deck, one from Akron Children’s Hospital parking lot, one from Gold Circle in Barberton and one woman from TransOhio Savings Bank in downtown Akron. All the victims were robbed and two were raped.

Lagway was armed with a knife and threatened the victims with their lives if they did not comply with his demands. Lagway didn’t just commit these crimes and leave. He terrorized these women for hours and before leaving each victim, he copied the information on their driver’s licenses, including their addresses. For his crimes, Lagway was sentenced to a minimum sentence of 109 years and a maximum sentence of 375 years.

After his arrest, while being questioned about the abductions and robberies near Akron City and Akron Children’s Hospitals, Lagway stated, “I’m an ex-con and a sinner and a heathen. Do your job. The more I suffer on earth the better it will be for me.”

We are asking for the public’s help in keeping this dangerous man in prison. There are several ways you can help.

willie-lagwayjpg-330106b5fe7d26e6_small

Willie Lagway went on a five day crime spree raping and terrorising women.

Click on the link below. It is a petition you can sign in support of keeping Lagway in prison. After signing the petition, please share the post with others.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/keeplagwayinjail

Email: DRC.Victim.Services@odrc.state.oh.us

Please send your email to the attention of: Cynthia Mausser, Parole Board Chair.

You can also send letters to:

Cynthia Mausser
Parole Board Chair
Ohio Parole Board
770 West Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43222

Please include Lagway’s name and Inmate Number A173689 on each page of the correspondence.

jihadist-rape-300x232

Kebab Monkey Shot 8 Times at Undercover Detective in Pool Hall Revenge Attack

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 04:21 PM PST

Daily Mail
January 12, 2015

248E2E8900000578-2903654-Meric_turns_around_when_officer_NC32_shouted_Armed_Police_and_be-a-21_1420882317096

The kebab-monkey Meric turned around when officer NC32 shouted ‘Armed Police’ and began shooting at the detective.

A kebab shop worker shot eight times at an undercover detective who tried to arrest him during a gun attack on a north London pool hall.

Sedat Meric fired three rounds into the pool bar in a revenge attack when he was approached by the undercover detective from the National Crime Agency.

Meric, 25, turned to the officer, raised his semi-automatic hand gun, and fired at the detective.

The chilling incident was captured on CCTV. The footage shows Meric, who was wearing a balaclava and hoodie open fire into the West Green Road Pool Bar in Haringey, north London.

A second camera shows the detective approaching and Meric opening fire before running onto Carlingford Road. He continued shooting at the officer, who was forced to seek cover behind a car on the opposite side of the road.

248E26B100000578-2903654-image-a-16_1420881880806

Sedat Meric was jailed for 15 years for shooting at the police officer.

Meric fired seven rounds at the officer, who despite being under heavy fire, continued to advance on the attacker.

Several witnesses can be seen running for their lives.

The officer, known only as NC32 was praised by an Old Bailey judge for his ‘courage and resolve’ for the manner in which he risked his life pursuing Meric.

Meric only surrendered when he ran out of bullets.

The 25-year-old and his accomplice Oktay Ayanoglu were found guilty of possessing a firearm and ammunition with intent to endanger life on May 23 last year following a trial at the Old Bailey.

248E26DC00000578-2903654-image-a-6_1420881445508

Without warning the non-White gunman, pictured, fired three rounds into the pool hall.

Meric, who worked in a family-run kebab shop, was jailed for 15 years while Ayanoglu, 22, was handed a 12-year prison sentence.

Judge Michael Topolski said it was ‘miraculous’ no-one was injured in the pre-meditated attack on the pool bar.

Commending the National Crime Agency officer NC32, the judge said: ‘He displayed all that is most creditable of police officers on whom we trust to put their own safety on the back seat for the protection of all the public.

248E26A100000578-2903654-image-m-15_1420881865035

Oktay Ayanoglu also received a 12-year jail term for possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life.

Read More

Evil Non-White Hate Preacher Gets Life for His Barbaric Crimes Against Whites and Non-Moslems

Posted: 11 Jan 2015 04:02 PM PST

Daily Mail
January 12, 2015

24883B7A00000578-2903753-image-m-14_1420827881125

Nasty non-White hate preacher Abu Hamza has been sentenced to life in prison for a string of terrorism offences by a judge in New York.

Abu Hamza was tonight jailed for life by a New York judge who branded him 'evil' and said she never wanted him to be released.

The hate cleric nodded his head and pursed his lips as Judge Katherine Forrest told him he was 'barbaric' and that he had shown no remorse or sympathy to his victims..

Judge Forrest said that a life sentence was the only option as she could never conceive of a time when he would not be a danger to the public – even 20 years from now.

Judge Forrest said that for Hamza 'the sheer point of your crimes is the killing of others and the destruction of a way of life, our way of life'.

She said: 'This is unacceptable in a civilised society. It's barbaric, it's misguided, it's wrong'.

24899E2200000578-2903753-image-a-3_1420827500267

British Governments spent a decade prevaricating and making excuses before finally extraditing him following allegations of his involvement in terrorist activities.

Judge Forrest – who was sitting a few blocks from the site of the 9/11 attacks – said that 'evil comes in many forms' and that Hamza disguised his true colours behind his religion.

She said: 'I do believe that there is another side to you – another side that this court views as evil.'

Hamza was jailed at Manhattan's Federal Court in a hearing that marks the end game for one of Britain's most reviled public figures.

His awful legacy was made clear this week after it emerged one of the suspects in the Paris massacre was a devotee of a former Hamza disciple at the Finsbury Park Mosque in North London, where he was imam.

Another link was that Hamza was found guilty of helping in a hostage taking in Yemen in 1998 that left three Britons and an Australian dead – the same country where the Paris suspects got their training.

2486917400000578-2903753-Mentor_Djamel_Beghal_a_key_al_Qaeda_leader_of_recruited_terroris-a-3_1420832398608

Cross-eyed retard Djamel Beghal, a key al Qaeda leader, recruited terrorists while worshiping at London’s Finsbury Park Mosque, met Charlie Hebdo murderers Cherif Kaouchi and Ahmedi Coulibaly in prison in France.

Hamza's other convictions related to facilitating violent jihad in Afghanistan and trying to set up a terrorist training camp in Bly, Oregon.

Speaking after the sentence Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara said: 'Abu Hamza's blood-soaked journey from cleric to convict, from Imam to inmate, is now complete.

24883B7300000578-2903753-image-a-15_1420827885105

Hamza led the Finsbury Park Mosque in the 1990s where many of today’s non-White terrorists first got their inspiration for killing White folks.

Read More

No comments: