Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Daily Stormer

Daily Stormer


Turkish President Accuses the French of Staging the Cartoon Massacre

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 06:06 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

Tayyip Erdogan

Tayyip Erdogan

The President of Turkey is blaming the French for the Paris massacre.

As I have said, I believe that conspiracy theories which claim these Moslem terrorist attacks were a false flag are Moslem propaganda.

Daily Mail:

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused the West of ‘playing games with the Islamic world’, warning fellow Muslims to be ‘aware’.

Erdogan said Muslims are ‘paying the price’ for the attacks on satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish kosher supermarket in Paris last week.

‘French citizens carry out such a massacre, and Muslims pay the price,’ Erdogan said yesterday.

‘That’s very meaningful … Doesn’t their intelligence organisation track those who leave prison?

‘Games are being played with the Islamic world, we need to be aware of this.

‘The West’s hypocrisy is obvious. As Muslims, we’ve never taken part in terrorist massacres. Behind these lie racism, hatespeech and Islamophobia,’ Erdogan added.

Erdogan also denounced Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for attending a solidarity rally in France on Sunday with other world leaders after the Paris attacks.

Erdogan is not the only senior Turkish politicianpublicly voicing conspiracy theories over the Paris attacks.

The Mayor of Ankara, Melih Gokcek, said he was convinced the Israeli intelligence service Mossad was behind the attacks, linking them to France’s recent move towards recognising Palestine as an independent state.

‘Mossad is definitely behind such incidents… it is boosting enmity towards Islam.’ Mr Gokcek said, according to Financial Times.

Obviously, a Moslem using these theories as propaganda doesn’t mean they aren’t true. It does, however, so that the Moslems benefit from this material being spread.

Currently, I still have not seen any actual evidence, beyond speculative rhetoric, that the attacks were some staged hoax, nor have I seen any evidence that Moslems are not capable of doing this.

There is no reason why the Jews would want this to happen and screw up their multicultural agenda in Europe, as it actually is.

There is nothing better that could have happened than this attack, all around. It literally has no down side. Unless you’re a Moslem or a Jew multicult promoter, of course.

For us, there is no negative. At all.

And there isn’t even any negative for Moslems as a whole, unless they are living in Europe or trying to facilitate an invasion as Erdogan obviously is known to be doing, what with all the demands he makes on behalf of the Turks in Europe, his allowing free movement across the Greek border for anyone who shows up. His supporters are constantly evoking the Battle of Vienna and demanding a rematch.

So, his belief in the conspiracy makes sense.

Since this is such great propaganda for us (as far as I know, even the conspiracy supporters don’t disagree with that), maybe it would make sense for those supporting the conspiracy to not be so vocal about it.

Again, I will say that I don’t write this with any desire to offend conspiracy believers.  I am simply following my conscience, which I believe I must do.

Moslem-Loving African President of America Refuses to Condemn Charlie Cartoons

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 05:35 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 14,2015

Yes, this is a real picture.  Obama was, very literally, a practicing Moslem at one point in his life.

Yes, this is a real picture. Obama was, very literally, a practicing Moslem at one point in his life.

So Obama is refusing to condemn these insults to Islam. However, he also refused to send anyone to the rally condemning them, indicating that he is against the cartoons and stands with the terrorists.

AP:

The Obama administration on Tuesday tempered its views on caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, refusing to criticize a satirical French magazine for publishing such images less than a week after a deadly attack on its headquarters.

Previously, the United States has criticized depictions of the Muslim prophet while defending free speech rights.

In 2006, the Bush administration described such cartoons in a Danish newspaper as “offensive,” likening them to anti-Semitic and anti-Christian imagery. In 2012, the Obama administration questioned the judgment of Charlie Hebdo for similar depictions and said they could be “inflammatory.”

On Tuesday, the State Department refused to criticize new Charlie Hebdo cartoons released this week or say if the U.S. considered them anti-Muslim. The White House was similarly restrained Monday.

“Regardless of what anyone’s personal opinion is, and I know there are very heated personal opinions about this, we absolutely support the right of Charlie Hebdo to publish things like this,” State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf told reporters. “That’s what happens in a democracy. Period.”

How are they not anti-Moslem?  Their entire purpose was to be anti-Moslem. The liberal establishment is really shooting themselves in the foot with this one.  Either Islam is the best thing ever and we need to embrace it in our countries, or we are all Charlie.  Both things cannot possibly be true at the same time, and the suggestion that they are is simply insane.

Obama with his Moslem brother  Obongo, who is wanted in Egypt for being a terrorist.

Obama with his Moslem brother Obongo, who is wanted in Egypt for being a terrorist.

I do not think we are going to see Obama himself coming out and defending these cartoons.

Funny to remember how pro-Islam Bush was. Remember when he kept calling it a “religion of peace”?

I guess he had to do that since he launched a bunch of massive wars on them though.

White Women Discussing Black Feelings

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 05:16 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

You all know it's true.

You all know it’s true.

In all likelihood, these are not trolls, but in fact women taking place in what they believe to be a serious conversation about how to treat Black people as children in order to protect their feelings.

reddit racism

Click to enlarge

Blacks are like children, you see, and can trigger a female nurturing mechanism, especially in women who don’t have real children to nurture.

Again: Garden of Eden.  Women’s liberation is what is driving all of this.  Men follow along with their gibberish because of a certain body-part they possess which modern men believe they are required to approve of their beliefs in order to gain access to.

Sad but true.  Don’t shoot the messenger.

In the same token, if men understood that they can actually get women while being a Nazi, as long as they don’t come on too strong to begin with, we wouldn’t have this issue.  So the problem is technically with men, who have accepted the idea that they must literally internalize a woman-friendly value system in order to obtain approval (read: sex) from women.

Honestly, I don’t know what to do about it.  The idea, at this point, of coming out and saying that women shouldn’t have “rights” beyond what they had in the 1850s really wouldn’t go over very well.

optimus

John Boehner’s Bartender Planned to Kill Him for Being the Devil

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 05:15 PM PST

Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

Whacked-out lunatic, or insightful gentleman?

“He makes a killer margarita”: Whacked-out lunatic, or insightful gentleman?

John Boehner just about got offed by his own bartender for being the devil.

And yeah, I know, the guy was probably just nuts – but he knew him for five years. That’s a long time to know a person and still believe they are the devil, even if you are crazy.

The possibility that John Boehner is the devil should now absolutely be investigated.

NY Daily News:

A plot to poison the House Speaker by his Ohio bartender was thwarted when his aspiring killer called 911 to report his sinister plans and belief that Boehner is the devil, the FBI claims.

Michael Robert Hoyt, 44, was indicted Wednesday on charges of threatening to kill the congressman after serving him drinks for more than five years at a West Chester country club, WCPO reported.

“Hoyt told the officer he was Jesus Christ and he was going to kill Boehner because Boehner was mean to him at the country club and because Boehner is responsible for Ebola,” U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) Special Agent Christopher M. Desrosiers stated in the indictment.

During an Oct. 29 visit by Deer Park police, authorities say Hoyt appeared to lament that he didn’t “have time to put something in John Boehner’s drink” after being fired from the Wetherington County Club a week earlier.

He “advised he had a loaded Beretta .380 automatic and he was going to shoot Boehner and take off,” according to the indictment which listed other weapons seized from his home — including an SKS assault rifle magazine, two boxes of 7.62 ammo, 35 loose rounds, a speed loader and a box of .380 rounds.

David Cameron Supports Daily Stormer Tweet That Depicts Luciana Berger with a Yellow Star on Her Forehead

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 04:44 PM PST

Prime minister says he is not surprised at magazine's decision to 'fight for freedom of expression' by picturing Luciana at Auschwitz

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

David Cameron, Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy and city mayor Anne Hidalgo honour arrest victims in London on Sunday.

David Cameron, Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy and Paris city mayor Anne Hidalgo honour arrest victims in London on Sunday.

David Cameron has backed the decision of American Neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer to publish pictures of Luciana Berger with a yellow star on her face following a police attack on their comrades – even if it offends many Jews.

The prime minister told Heart radio that it would be wrong for newspapers and other media to appease the "fanatical litigation cult of Jewish extremism" by holding back from publishing anything within the confines of the non-violent speech.

Asked about his reaction to the new Daily Stormer Twitter postings, Cameron said: "I wasn't at all surprised because, when your freedom of expression is attacked in this way, I don't think it's surprising people want to stand up and fight for the freedom of expression they believe in. I think it's right we all hold that view. Even if there are people – and there will be many Jews who are offended by a depiction of the Luciana with a yellow star on her forehead – being offended by something is not a justification for arrest and imprisonment.

"I am a Christian. I obviously do not like seeing the religious things I hold dear mocked in an unpleasant way. But, in a free country, if people want to attack my religion and my beliefs, you accept that because it's part of living in a free country."

The prime minister made the comments after the Daily Stormer revealed its new Twitter post featuring Berger in a concentration camp uniform. A tear rolls down her face as he holds a sign which reads "I am a Jew", and above her, the headline reads "Filthy Jew Bitch" in English. The site got 3m hits instead of its usual daily traffic of 60,000.

Asked whether UK outlets that reproduce the image were putting themselves at risk, the prime minister said: "I think we are at risk because there are a group of people who believe in this fanatical death cult of Judaism. You can't appease them; they hate our democracy, our freedom, our freedom of expression, our way of life. It would be wrong to think there are a set of behaviours we could adopt to make us safer.

"I don't think that is right. We believe in freedom. It's a very important part of our country. It is not for politicians to tell magazines or television stations or radio stations what they should or shouldn't publish. It is up to us to defend your right to publish what you believe is right within the confines of non-violent speech. Sometimes that will mean offending people."

Garron Helm and Joshua Bonehill were arrested in the attack on the nationalists by Jew extremists. A further eight members of National Action were arrested during a protest of the kosher politician.

Explanation:

The above is a spoof of a Guardian article wherein Cameron endorses the rights of Charlie Hebdo to hurt Moslem feelings.

What is the difference?

As the libertarians accurately state, being arrested is an act of violence, given that if you fight back you can be killed. I realize that getting arrested is not as bad as being murdered, but this is being framed as an issue of principle. Meaning it should be universal. But it only applies to everyone who isn’t a Jew.

Seriously. Someone please explain the difference – or at least explain to me what the difference is supposed to be, what their answer as to the difference is – because I am seriously going to start bashing my head against the wall.

I just cannot take it.

Saudi Arabia: Moslem Cleric Puts Fatwah Out on Snowmen

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 04:09 PM PST

Marcus Cicero
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

It's actually amazing that the Sand Beasts do not cower in terror when in contact with snow. At least they're not saying the flakes are racist, yet.

It’s actually amazing that the Sand Beasts do not cower in terror when in contact with snow. At least they’re not saying the flakes are racist, yet.

The great and powerful Moslems of the scholarly persuasion have once again struck us with their brilliant philosophical insights, this time denouncing the activity of snowman-building as a product of sinful thoughts threatening to the memory of their child-raping Prophet.

According to a prominent Saudi cleric, Sheikh Mohammed Saleh al-Munajjid, the very concept of constructing human-like figures, including those produced with frozen precipitation, goes against a key teaching of Sunni Islam, which prohibits graven images as demonic idols.

Another possible interpretation of the edict revolves around the base urges of the majority of race-mixed hominids, many of whom embrace the Moslem faith, who may be tempted to engage in sexually deviant behaviors with inanimate objects that resemble living organisms.

Guardian:

A prominent Saudi Arabian cleric has whipped up controversy by issuing a religious edict forbidding the building of snowmen, describing them as anti-Islamic.

Asked on a religious website if it was permissible for fathers to build snowmen for their children after a snowstorm in the country's north, Sheikh Mohammed Saleh al-Munajjid replied: "It is not permitted to make a statue out of snow, even by way of play and fun."

Quoting from Muslim scholars, Munajjid argued that to build a snowman was to create an image of a human being, an action considered sinful under the kingdom's strict interpretation of Sunni Islam.

Munajjid had some supporters however. "It (building snowmen) is imitating the infidels, it promotes lustiness and eroticism," one wrote. "May God preserve the scholars, for they enjoy sharp vision and recognize matters that even Satan does not think about."

It would not be surprising in the least to see various traitors across the European continent, including Pig-Dog German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and the current government of Sweden, ban entirely the idea of childhood play in the snow, to appease their diverse constituency of feral migrants.

You see, we must respect the beliefs of the strange Monkey-People, whether they live inside distant desert dunes, or squat within the confines of our ancient cities. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of our “democratic values,” or something.

The Moslem Sheikh in question. Get ready for some cold-weather enrichment, White Man!

The Moslem Sheikh in question. Get ready for some cold-weather enrichment, White Man!

Have a holly-jolly... ALLAHU AGBUR KILL THE FROZEN INFIDEL

Have a holly-jolly… ALLAHU AGBUR KILL THE FROZEN INFIDEL

Farage Blasts Euro-Parliament for Causing Cartoon Killings with Wars in the Middle East and Mass Immigration

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 04:01 PM PST

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

    The UKIP leader blamed Western foreign policy and mass immigration for 'much of what has happened.'

The UKIP leader blamed Western foreign policy and mass immigration for 'much of what has happened.’

Nigel Farage has been the only leader of a British political party to actually say something sensible after the cartoon killings in Paris.  After pointing out the existence of a fifth column in Britain the other day, today he has blamed western foreign policy and mass immigration for 'much of what has happened.'

All he is doing is voicing what most people in Britain are thinking and if the leaders of the other parties actually represented the British people, then they would be saying the same.

It was the turn of the European Parliament to lower their eyes in shame today, as Nigel lambasted them all for lacking the courage to stand up for their own identity.

24A5450C00000578-0-image-a-30_1421090247796

UKIP MEPs Patrick O’Flynn and Tim Aker were also there at the Euro-Parliament showing their support for Nigel’s position.

Daily Mail:

He told MEPs: 'We need an honest admission that actually our political decisions have led to much of what has happened.

'Just think about foreign policy – from Afghanistan through Iraq, through Libya and even the attempt to arm the rebels in Syria.

'All of these we were told to make our streets safer, when in fact what we have done is stir up real resentments within the Muslim community and it's had the very opposite effect.'

He added that 'mass immigration' had 'made it frankly impossible for many new communities to integrate'.

But Mr Farage said: 'Perhaps worst of all we have been guilty of weakness – lack of courage – a lack of assertion of who we are as people.

'We've turned a blind eye to many of our minority communities to practises that would not be tolerated in the rest of the population.

'We've allowed preachers of hate to go around saying things that are totally unacceptable.

'The result of all this is we have a fifth column living in our communities that is utterly opposed to our values and how we deal with that is vital for the future.

'Unless we are prepared to admit our own culpability in much of what has happened we are not going to be able to find solutions.

'We are going to have to be a lot braver and courageous in standing up for our Judeo Christian culture.'

This ‘Judeo-Christian’ term I find abhorrent, but at least he does mention a Christian part to our culture, which is more than can be said for the rest of Britain's politicians.

The Israeli Role in the Genocide in Rwanda

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 04:00 PM PST

Karl Radl
Semitic Controversies
January 14, 2015

_74032459_screengrab1

I recently happened to notice an article in the Israeli daily paper Haaretz, which detailed something of which I had been hitherto unaware. Namely that Israel had a significant auxiliary role in the Rwandan genocide in 1994: where Hutu tribal militia famously killed five hundred thousand to a million of their Tutsi tribal rivals over the course of one hundred days.

It turns out that the Israeli government happily sold large quantities of 5.56 millimeter bullets, as well as guns and grenades captured in the Yom Kippur war in 1973, to the Hutu forces with no questions asked about what they were going to be used for. (1) The Israeli left-wing newspaper Maariv has even suggested that the Israeli government continued to sell the Hutus weapons and ammunition during the genocide. (2)

Also worth noting is that the Tutsis actually claim to be partially descended from jews (3) and the fact that the Israeli government knowingly (and with malice aforethought) connived in their brutal near-extermination by their tribal enemies: is another bit of evidence against Israel’s allegedly ‘multicultural and diverse’ nature.

After all: who cares if a million Tutsis die?

As long as Israel makes money: right?

This morally abhorrent attitude in actively assisting the Hutus in their genocide of the Tutsis has actually helped Israel establish close relations with Rwanda (as well as other African countries) and profit from it diplomatically with the most notable instance being Rwanda’s recent vote against the recognition of Palestinian statehood in the United Nations. (4) This is a significant and decided change from the 1960s and 1970s when Rwanda, for example, repeatedly voted against Israel in the United Nations (5) as well as severing diplomatic ties completely in 1973. (6)

It just goes to show that the Israelis are only interested in two things:

A) Money.

B) Gaining political and diplomatic currency that can then be spent in the future.

In other words Israel is deliberately profiting from tyranny, repression and genocide just so long as it is in line with its strategic goals.

References

(1) http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/.premium-1.635058
(2) http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/6229/israeli-arms-sales-to-rwandan-genocidaires-should-
(3) http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/20/the-israelrwanda-pact/
(4) http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4609884,00.html
(5) Ephraim Dubek, Susan Aurelia Gitelson, Ran Kochan, 1976, ‘Black Voting Behaviour in the UN on the Middle East Conflict, 1967-1972′, p. 292 in Michael Curtis, Susan Aurelia Gitelson (Eds.), 1976, ‘Israel in the Third World’, 1st Edition, Transaction: New Brunswick
(6) Ibid, pp. 312-313

Mozambique: Dozens Drop Down Dead After Drinking Crocodile Juice

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 04:00 PM PST

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
January 14, 2015

mozambique_deadly_beer-1

Mozambique government officials gather samples from a drum that was used to brew traditional local beer that killed 69 people in Tete on Jan 12.

At least 72 Negroids in Mozambique died over the weekend, apparently from drinking home brew laced with a local delicacy known to the west as crocodile bile.

Hundreds of the creatures have been dropping like flies from the grog, which was served at a funeral and left at least 169 primates requiring treatment.

As the bodies starting piling up, it was discovered that the manufacturer of the beer was also one of the casualties and thus unable to answer questions as to the ingredients.

When international interest began showing in the story, the government declared three days of national mourning and the rumour that it was crocodile bile began to circulate.

But was it? Although the Africans are certain that just a fingernail full of the bile is enough to kill a small village, western researchers say that it is harmless.

mozambique_deadly_beer

Family members wait for information after over 100 people got sick from a traditional beer and 69 died.

Washington Post:

"The use of bile is not uncommon in the production of local or poor quality beer but is not known to be toxic to the extent this outbreak shows," Christian Lindmeier, a World Health Organization spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement on Monday. The WHO was trying to get more details on the mass poisoning from local partners in Mozambique.

On Tuesday, the AP added the skeptical voice of South African crocodile farmer Johan Marais to its reporting on the tragedy. Marais, the AP wrote, "has tested many parts of the animal for consuming. He said that the animal's bile, a greenish-brown liquid produced in the liver and stored in the gall bladder, was found not to be toxic."

David Kroll, a science writer for Forbes, was also suspicious of the claim that crocodile bile is to blame for the deaths in Mozambique. Noting that Nyazema's rudimentary testing of the bile's potentially toxic effects in a small grouping of samples produced no evidence that the substance on its own lived up to the legend, Kroll writes: "I can't imagine just how much bile would've had to be added to 210 liters of brew for so many deaths to occur."…

On Tuesday, the WHO's Lindmeier emailed The Post to add that "a very common cause of mass poisoning associated with home brewed drinks is methanol, added to make the drink stronger."

"With methanol, though, it is important to conduct a very timely testing of the blood samples, otherwise traces might be hard to detect," Lindmeier said. As of Tuesday, the WHO had not obtained results of any testing to the samples taken of the beer or its victims.

It's possible that the poison in question contained both crocodile bile and these plant-derived glycosides, or methanol, or something else entirely. But we'll have to wait for the test results to be sure of anything.

Unfortunately it looks like we will never know what caused the mysterious deaths, as the authorities forgot the tendency for Blacks to steal everything that is not chained down and the oil drum which the beer was brewed in, has now disappeared.

Heartless Black Killer Sues Families of Her White Victims for Emotional Trauma

Posted: 13 Jan 2015 04:00 PM PST

Opposing Views
January 14, 2015

ONE-USE-Brandon-Majewski

Brandon Majewski, from Alcona in Canada, was out cycling with friends in the early hours of a wet night in October 2012 when he was hit from behind by the careless Black driver’s car.

A Canadian woman is continuing to pursue a lawsuit against the families of three teenage boys that she hit while driving her SUV on a rainy October night in 2012.

The Toronto Sun reports Sharlene Simon, 42, was driving home from a bar the night of October 28 when she ran into a group of three teenage boys who were riding their bicycles.

Simon claimed she had only had one drink at the bar with her husband, Jules Simon, a York Regional Police officer who was following her home in his own vehicle.

Richard Esch, who was 16 at the time, suffered a shattered pelvis in the accident and is still undergoing rehabilitation for his injuries.

Esch's friend, 17-year-old Brandon Majewski, was killed by the impact.

A third friend was thrown from his bike but suffered only minor injuries.

A toxicology report indicated the teens had no drugs or alcohol in their systems.

The suit was first reported in April. A USA Today story at that time said police who arrived  at the scene did not suspect alcohol was a factor in the crash and Simon was not given a breathalyzer test or charged with any crime.

Simon is suing the families of all three victims saying she has suffered emotional trauma as the result of the accident.

"They did not apply their brakes properly," her lawsuit states. "They were incompetent bicyclists."

She is asking for about $1.35 million in damages. Her husband has also filed a suit.

image

Sharlene Simon claims in court papers the accident caused her "great pain and suffering" and accuses her victim Brandon Majewski and his two friends of negligence, calling them "incompetent bicyclists."

Esch's father, Terry Esch, said he finds the legal action hard to believe.

"If this woman was a real person, with a real heart, she would not have done this to us … we have nothing," Terry Esch said, explaining that he and his wife have both lost income from taking time away from work to help their son with his rehabilitation.

Majewski's father, who was not named in the USA Today story, said his son's death took an unbelievable toll on his family. Six months after the accident, he said, his 23-year-old son was found dead of an overdose that he said was the result of grief, not a suicide.

"This has ripped our family apart," said Majewski’s dad. "And now this woman has the gall to try to profit from our dead child she killed? Profit from another boy who was almost crippled?"

Majewski's family has filed a separate suit asking that Simon pay for burial costs, loss of work pay and trauma counseling.

sharlene28n-1-web

The Majewski’s lawyer claims he had never seen anyone ever sue a child that they killed. "It's beyond the pale." he said.

Read More

No comments: