> Hello,
>
> Julien Vehent a écrit :
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:33:13 +0100, Chris Haynes <chris@harvington.org.uk> wrote:
>>> $ sudo iptables -v -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT
>>> --to-port 8080
>>> REDIRECT tcp opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 redir
>>> ports 8080
>>> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
>>
>> Has the sage would say, RTFM. If you had, you would have noticed that
>> you missed an "s" at --to-ports :p
>
> If that was the problem, the error message would be different.
> Actually the full option name is not required. An iptables option name
> can be shortened if it does not conflict with another. "--to-ports" can
> be shortened to "--to".
...
You're right, the "--to-port" argument works fine. I should probably go slap myself for being cocky.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-firewall-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0b83c2ec7995057742e0f618f3668399@localhost
No comments:
Post a Comment