Daily Stormer |
- British School Children to be Force-Fed Stupid Lie That Britain has “Always Been a Land of Immigrants”
- Daily Stormer Forced Twitter to Change Their Troll Policy
- Leftists and the Jews: An Occupy Wall St. Case Study
- Blackfaced Facebook Fiend Arrested for Threats to Kill Hero Darren
- Savage Black Murderer Who Killed Entire White Family Sues Over Conditions on Death Row
- Sweden: 76 “Asylum Seekers” to be Dumped in a Resort Town of 50 People
- A Wyatt Mann was Right Again
- Eric Holder Cracking Down on “Racial Profiling” in Wake of Ferguson Decision
- Somali Rapist Says Sharing Girls for Sex is Moslem Religious Requirement
- Age of Treason Radio: Race and Jews – Part 7
| Posted: 03 Dec 2014 09:00 AM PST Steve Goode  What you goyim kiddies need to understand is that it’s always been like this somehow. OCR, a group in charge of secondary school (high school) level exams and qualifications, has announced that it will be creating a new course called "Migration into Britain", focusing on the last 2,000 years. When you look further into this, you find that this new course is clearly intended to teach an anti-White view of immigration to impressionable young minds. The OCR board said that students would be "surprised to learn" that there may have been up to 15,000 Black people in London by 1750. OCR Head of History, Mike Goddard, said: "Migration is an ideal history topic for GCSE students to study, allowing them to consider fundamental historical concepts such as continuity, change and significance, rooted in the major events of England's history." "Doing this through the lens of the movement of diverse groups of people has the added benefit of contemporary relevance and will make for a rigorous, stimulating and enjoyable course." He added that students which take the course will explore and understand "the constant shifts in the British population" What you really have to ask is: "Why is this being introduced now?" In the UK, the majority of the general public have grown tired of mass immigration, and are beginning to vote for parties which do not push White genocide. "Shifts in population" is an argument straight out of the big anti-White book of arguments. They love to describe what they are doing as a "demographics shift" so they can avoid the blame. "Demographics shift" is just another one of those code words for White genocide. |
| Daily Stormer Forced Twitter to Change Their Troll Policy Posted: 03 Dec 2014 08:54 AM PST Andrew Anglin  da-nananana-nanana After Operation: Filthy Jew Bitch led to the government of the United Kingdom attacking Twitter and claiming Twitter needed to stop Antisemites from hurting the feelings of Jews, Twitter has changed it’s trolling policy, making it easier for people to report hurt feelings.  Mean words on Twitter were going to lead to another lampshading if Twitter didn’t act…!
Take a bow, Stormer Trolls. Methinks it is probably time we tested out how well this new system works. What say ye? UPDATE: For those who don’t have the background on this operation: |
| Leftists and the Jews: An Occupy Wall St. Case Study Posted: 03 Dec 2014 08:43 AM PST Andrew Anglin Someone sent me this screenshot of a post on the Occupy Wall St. Facebook page: I was interested, so I found the page, which is actually not the biggest OWS page, but has about 700,000 followers. By the time I got there, the above image had already been deleted, but I went through and looked at some of their other pics. A lot of stuff like this: But that is to be expected. We know these people love the Blacks and hate the White man. I was interested in what they think about Jews. They are definitely anti-Israel.
Apparently, they view Israelis as “White men” oppressing the poor disenfranchised brown folks. The Jews claim this is Antisemitism. It isn’t, actually. But, it could lead to that. When I saw the first screenshot of the Juden pic, I thought maybe it was leading that way. But it isn’t really. At least not in this case study of one Occupy Facebook page. But leftists always have such a hive mind, I am inclined to think this is pretty representative of the general trends. It jives with all of the other leftist material I see on Jews. Interestingly, they believe in the “ISIS is an Israeli Mossod operation” conspiracy theory.
As the reader is probably aware, I have always thought this conspiracy theory was not particularly grounded in fact, and was being used as a way to apologize for Muslims by claiming they are “not savages” in the way these leftists are using the theory. Regrettably, Mr. Occupy, the KKK does represent traditional Christianity in the same way that ISIS represents traditional Islam. The Leftist Issue Leftists hate rich people, which is fine. No one really likes these people. They are also pro-environment, which I agree with. Beyond that, the whole thing is just pretty goofy. They are still very much tied to the Marxist egalitarian concept, and thought there are times when that is agreeable – such as in the case of Israel, banker Jews, multinational corporations – it is very much more often cartoonishly harmful – Blacks have a right to attack people on the street and if you’re White and you defend yourself you’re a cold-blooded murderer, Islam is secretly a peaceful religion somehow because Muslims don’t believe in their own texts, we should have unlimited immigrants because if it wasn’t for Whites third world nations wouldn’t be so poor, and so on. Because of this egalitarianism, they will always be the friend of the Jew. Though I support any and all attempts to make the leftist scene more anti-Jew, as it is a net gain in the larger scheme of things, we can’t really expect much out of these people, even if, on the surface, we agree on a few things. The good news is that the leftist movement is collapsing in on itself. Rebellion is a natural thing when the system is wrong. Young people have a desire to fight against something, to fix things, make the world better. The whole energy that it had was in that it was fighting against something, but more and more, all of their positions are the same as the ruling establishment. Though they attack Obama as a warmonger, they agree with him about nearly everything else. We are the hip scene. We actually are fighting the establishment. We actually are persecuted for it. We actually want real change which will benefit the most disenfranchised people on the planet. More and more, youthful rebellion is coming our way, rather than toward the tired old clichés of the leftist scene. |
| Blackfaced Facebook Fiend Arrested for Threats to Kill Hero Darren Posted: 03 Dec 2014 08:32 AM PST Q13 Fox  Darren Wilson has had to leave the Police after wild animals threatened to kill him. A Kirkland man was arrested this week after authorities said he threatened to kill former Ferguson Missouri Police officer Darren Wilson. Authorities said Jaleel Tariq Abdul-Jabbaar, 46, starting posting threats to Facebook shortly after the August shooting of Michael Brown. Investigators said the threats escalated and continued through late November. Abdul-Jabbaar also allegedly threatened other officers and even attempted to use Facebook to buy a gun.  Jaleel Tariq Abdul-Jabbaar has been arrested for jabbering about killing the officer on Facebook. Acting U.S. Attorney Annette Hayes said freedom of speech does not extend to threats to kill or injure law enforcement officers. If convicted on all three counts of making interstate threats, Abdul-Jabbaar could face up to five years in prison.  He could get up to five years for the crime. |
| Savage Black Murderer Who Killed Entire White Family Sues Over Conditions on Death Row Posted: 03 Dec 2014 06:04 AM PST KCTV 5  The entire Harvey family were butchered by two Black devils. A man sentenced to die for murdering a South Richmond family is suing over conditions on Virginia’s death row. Ricky Gray is one of five death row inmates suing the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and the warden of the Sussex State Prison. They claim they aren’t given enough freedom as they spend their days in solitary confinement. Gray was sentenced to death for the murders of the Harvey family in their Woodland Heights home on New Year’s Day 2006 in one of the most gruesome crimes in Richmond history. “Horrendous!” cried Richmond native Cynthia Erdahl. “Just the saddest thing you could ever think of.” Gray remains on death row pending an appeal. He, and the other death row inmates, complain they are kept in solitary confinement for the majority of the day. Gray is only occasionally allowed out of his cell to cut the hair of other inmates, according to the lawsuit. They also claim the one hour of outdoor recreation they receive five days a week is insufficient, because they are not allowed to use exercise equipment, not allowed in the gym or prison yard, nor given exercise equipment to use in the pod. They are also allowed out of their cell for a 10-minute shower three days a week and can purchase a TV and CD player, as well as request books from the library, according to the lawsuit.  Ricky Gray has not been executed yet and is even allowed to sue over his treatment. Where is the justice in that? The inmates also complain about being barred from vocational, educational,or behavioral programming, and group religious services. They are only allowed visits from immediate family members on weekends in a room with a glass partition. “They just killed all those people,” said Erdahl. “How can they file a lawsuit? That’s ridiculous.” They claim the treatment is unconstitutional. “You have sentenced us to death, but you are not allowed to torture us in the meantime. That’s what they are saying in this lawsuit,” said NBC12 legal analyst Steve Benjamin. |
| Sweden: 76 “Asylum Seekers” to be Dumped in a Resort Town of 50 People Posted: 03 Dec 2014 04:52 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Next stop: An historic Swedish resort! Sweden is so completely ridiculous, most of the stories coming out of it read like satire. They are a caricature of suicidal altruism, literally celebrating the destruction of everything their ancestors passed on to them for safe keeping, robbing future generations of their birthright and smiling about it, condescending anyone who dares question their right to do this.
Translated by Andrew Anglin, master of linguistics. |
| Posted: 03 Dec 2014 04:34 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Garrison hasn’t been caught yet, but he hasn’t been heard from either… where could he be? Here is yet more evidence that A. Wyatt Mann, also known as Ben Garrison, was right. The first set of evidence is here.
The entire existing collection of A. Wyatt Mann’s work is available on the Daily Stormer Troll Forum. |
| Eric Holder Cracking Down on “Racial Profiling” in Wake of Ferguson Decision Posted: 03 Dec 2014 03:42 AM PST Benjamin Garland  "What chu gun’ do, cracka ass crackas? We bees da mufuggin’ law now." – Eric "E-Dawg" Holder, Attorney General of the United States of America. Eric Holder has announced that he is going to take more stringent measures against so-called "racial profiling" by police officers, meaning that even though most criminals are Black, and most Blacks are criminal, if a cop thinks a Black criminal may be a criminal and acts accordingly, they will be breaking the law and could receive severe punishment (up to and including being crucified on national media, à la Darren Wilson, apparently). It matters not that every single fact of the Ferguson case–demonstrated in a court of law–shows that Michael Brown was a typical Black monster who had just robbed a convenient store, and that Darren Wilson was completely innocent and acting out of self-defense when he shot him. Our chimp overlords are making it clear that they are still going to use the case as an excuse to oppress White Americans in every way possible. Is Attorney General Eric Holder—the chief lawyer of the U.S. Government—really ignorant enough to not know the facts of the Ferguson case? No, of course not. Admittedly, African ape-people are not very bright—even those who occupy high office—but even he is not that ignorant. We are living in a naked, anti-White tyranny at this point, and I have a feeling it is not going to stop until we make it stop.
Did you like the part where Holder quoted the serial criminal, cop-shooting, sodomite rapist Tupac Shakur? I can’t think of anyone ever who was ever more fit to fill the role of U.S. Attorney General, can you?  We must put an end to racial profiling. |
| Somali Rapist Says Sharing Girls for Sex is Moslem Religious Requirement Posted: 03 Dec 2014 03:40 AM PST Daily Stormer  Gang members booked a room at a Bristol hotel where a 13-year-old girl was then raped by three Somalian savages. We have repeatedly tried to stress the point that these gang-rapes and prostitution rings committed by the immigrants are very often not simply random acts, but an actual organized campaign which connects back to the Islamic religion. Recently, a Somalian gang-raper in the UK admitted as much.  These cultures, goyim: are you really so stupid and racist and evil that you cannot grasp their vibrancy? BBC:
Of course, we don’t take the Kosher Konservative line that if these savages would simply convert to Christianity they would stop behaving this way. They would not. It is in their blood. The point is that just as Christianity is a manifestation of the racial soul of the White man, Islam is a manifestation of the racial soul of the various hordes of non-Whites.  Hugh Sherriffe has replaced the White director of Barnardos children’s charity and the BBC dishonestly used him to try and pretend the Somalian rapists were the exception to the rule. Sure, if the savages take on the religion of the White man, that may have some effect on them, civilizing them a slight bit. In the same way, White men who adopt Islam tend to become more savage. It may also be that non-Whites who are prone to adopt Christianity have a genetic predisposition to a somewhat softer behavior pattern with the opposite being true for Whites who adopt Islam. I am uncertain, but it should be investigated by scientists. The bottom line however is that this is a racial issue and Islam itself is a racial phenomenon. All culture is a manifestation of the blood. It comes from nothing else. History and the modern world show us this reality over and over and over again. |
| Age of Treason Radio: Race and Jews – Part 7 Posted: 03 Dec 2014 02:16 AM PST Tanstaafl
Eric Goldstein's book, The Price of Whiteness: Jews, Race, and American Identity, documents and tries to explain, from a jewish point of view, the complete about face in attitudes about race which occurred during the 20th century, specifically the shift jews made among themselves. Our concern is how they have since manipulated Whites to toe their "anti-racist" line. During the 19th century and into the 20th Whites were just beginning to appreciate the depth and breadth of their roots, their biological relationship with each other, but also to recognize their common parasite. They were beginning to appreciate just how biologically and psychologically distinct and implacably alien and hostile the jews are and have always been. How the jews have in fact insisted upon being and remaining this way. This growing understanding of their roots, this racial consciousness, was not fabricated out of nothing, but was based on evidence gathered from study and research – archeology, linguistics, biology. It was spreading not only among the elite, the intelligensia, but was beginning to trickle out to the masses too. In the first half of the 20th century Madison Grant's Passing of the Great Race and Lothrop Stoddard's Rising Tide of Color were popular books. White understanding of race was increasing. In 1933 the national socialists took power in Germany, and for the first time a White European government officially and definitively answered the question, "who is us", and pursued policies guided by the principle, "what's best for us", racially. Expressing a collective group-consciousness that for the first time approximated (and took into account the competitive and adversarial nature of) the kind of collective awareness of identity and interests that the jews had been practicing for millenia among Europeans. Even before this, before this racial consciousness had fully coallesced into a national socialist government, those jews most aware of their collective interests recognized this burgeoning understanding among their host as a threat to the jews. They saw that jews embracing race was not going to be good for the jews in the long run. Their efforts to thwart this rising consciousness pre-date the founding of national socialism. We've mentioned Franz Boas and Maurice Fishberg, whom were just two of the more prominent names among the many jews who ultimately co-opted and derailed race science. By the time national socialism rose to power in Germany the jews had come to the consensus that race was definitely bad for the jews, and they were throwing all their efforts into an idea, a movement that would eventually be called "anti-racism". "Anti-racism" is a jewish contruct, though they have tried to generalize it and otherwise obscure this. As many Whites are beginning to realize, "anti-racism" is really just anti-Whitism. It is a movement, a perverse way of thinking about race that doesn't abolish the idea of race, but simply inverts White consciousness – making White bad and non-White good. It was inspired and continues to be led and driven by jews who think that this is what's best for the jews. Let's return one last time to Golstein's book, where he describes jewish attitudes in America during the first decade of the 20th century. Unlike their "anti-racism" today, back then jews openly identified themselves as a race, because they thought that was what was best for the jews. As Goldstein put it, race "fit the needs of jews" "in the larger white world". This bit, from page 107, is part of the discussion of Simon Wolf's (the jew lobbyist who knew every president between Lincoln and Wilson) appearance before the Immigration Commission in 1909, where he was questioned by Senator Henry Cabot Lodge on the issue of whether jews are a race or religion. Wolf infamously denied their racial nature and instead conflated jewishness with religion.
The Zionist source is reprinted in a book I mentioned briefly in Part 1 of this series, Jews and Race: Writings on Identity and Difference, 1880-1940. It covers roughly the same period and attitudes as Goldstein's book, but offers less narrative and more in the way of original sources. Among them is an article from a 1910 issue of Maccabaean, There is No Jewish Race!, which contains the criticism of Wolf quoted above, and more, including this:
As previously mentioned, the authors of Henry Ford's The International Jew – The World's Foremost Problem also discussed Wolf's testimony. In October 1920 they wrote:
They were noticing certain consistent traits of the jews. First, how the jews demand and often get special, unique, exceptional treatment. Contra Goldstein, there is no liability, no price connected to their privilege. Jews demand that there be no restrictions on jews, effectively imposing restrictions on their host. What seems to be duality, hypocrisy, or double standards, one story or standard for non-jews, another for themselves, is really just one standard: what's best for the jews. The International Jew was a well-known and popular book in 1920s America. It is valuable because it documents the White attitude about race and the jews at that time. But in many respects Ford and his TIJ writers were too optimistic, too conciliatory. They regarded the jews as peers, social and political equals, or at least saw them as having the potential to be so. They maintained a pretense that they were trying to appeal to and influence the jews, and called for them to step forward and challenge their leaders. This was a weak rhetorical device that was more likely actually aimed at stirring their more "liberal"-minded White readers to resent the fact that jews were not showing any interest in participating in their "liberal" American project as peers, but were instead well aware of and committed to pursuing their own narrow identity and interests. At that point in time Ford and Americans in general believed the Anglo-Saxon founding stock still ruled America, but were also generally unaware of the threat posed to them by the jews. A half-year after the piece above was published, the TIJ writers seemed to have come to realize that the conflict and its stakes were more dire than they had at first let on. In May of 1921 they wrote:
Throughout TIJ we find not only various aspects of jewish influence described but also jewish personality traits. They identified the jews as a race with persistent, collective, racial traits. One of those characteristic traits is how jews alternate between openly announcing themselves and bragging about their influence, and yet also disguise themselves and deny their powerful influence. This is no mystery. They do whichever is good for the jews in a given situation. Another characteristic trait is how the jews swarm collectively to self-righteously attack those who take notice of their activities and oppose them. Ford too was subjected to this treatment, and it continues to this day. Some examples of jewish attitudes are attached as "Editorial Reviews" to the bookseller Amazon's page for The International Jew:
Never mind baseball. The trouble with America, then and now, is too much jew. Note how jews seem to relish criticism, how they so eagerly repeat it, without denial. Instead they embellish and distort their critics in a telling way that reflects their own view of the world around them. Theirs is a world populated not with individuals but with jews mindlessly antagonized by "anti-semites", a single-minded, calculating cabal of malicious schemers plotting to control the planet. The jews blame all the troubles of jews then, now, and into the future on "anti-semitism". And yet what they call "anti-semitism" is simply anti-parasitism, the host's recognition and resentment of jewish infiltration, maniuplation and exploitation. It is a reaction to the harm caused by the jews pursuing their own interests. Interestingly, jewish anti-"anti-semitism", combating their host's anti-parasitism, pre-dates their "anti-racism". Today these two things are seen as connected, with "anti-semitism" being a special form of "racism", a specific awareness of the jews as racially distinct and hostile. A second review at Amazon is more of the same. Because the jews ultimately prevailed over the fair-minded Anglo-Saxons with by fraud, they still can't be honest about what they did. Instead they malign Ford, faulting him for thinking and behaving as they actually do:
Here at the end I'd like to take the opportunity to point you to two brief but authoritative and well-presented explanations of the jews and race. The first is a ten-minute video presentation by David Duke. Duke approach comes across as a contemporary version of the early TIJ, at least in his laying out of the facts and can't-we-all-just-get-along attitude. Duke primariliy cites jews on the religion versus race question, and points out jewish hypocrisy in their attitudes about race and racial purity. Kevin Strom's recent podcast, Jewish Weakness, also discusses the jewish race and religion, but lays them out and puts them together in a way that provides a more complete understanding. Strom asks, "Who are these people? And why do they do the things they do to us? The answer can be found in Jewish genes and Jewish memes." He notes:
The key, I think, is perception, which is to say consciousness. Strom's conclusion:
Joe Sobran observed in 1996 that:
"Paralyzing", and other such words people choose when they describe the jewish problem, indicate the host-parasite nature of the problem, even when it is not consciously acknowledged. The furtive power of the jews is the apparent paradox to which Sobran refers. The two concepts – furtiveness and power – seem at odds, but are not really. Furtive power is another way of saying illegitimate or unpopular power. A power whose strength lies in remaining unrecognized and thus unopposed. The most pliable host is an unwitting host. The jews control the media because they must in order to survive as a collective, in order to put their ideas, their consciousness of their interests into their hosts' heads. Also, to ensure that their host remains otherwise unaware, unconscious of its own interests. Unconscious of the manipulation and exploitation. Unconscious of the grievous harm being done by the jews. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Daily Stormer To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment