Daily Stormer

---

• Fascism in the UK: Farage Says People Who Work in the Hospital Should Speak English
• I’ll take “Black People” for $500, Alex…
• Disgusting Monkeys Ruin the Meals of Random Whites with Aggressive Harassment
• Is It Time for Explicit Talk About White Interests in Louisiana?
• The Future Belongs to Us
• Black Gunman Gets Life for Killing White Father During a Verbal Dispute
• Iceland to Withdraw EU Application
• Wealth Gap Widens as Welfare Use Soars Under Black Communist Leader
• FEMEN Comes to Greece Specifically to Fight Golden Dawn
• Jew Media and SJWs Attack Christian Mother After Her Mentally Ill Son Commits Suicide

Fascism in the UK: Farage Says People Who Work in the Hospital Should Speak English Posted: 05 Jan 2015 10:11 AM PST Daily Stormer January 5, 2015 Nigel Farage While you may have thought UKIP was softening up when they let that stinking Paki into the party, it was all a ruse and they’re as fascist as ever.  This time, Farage is claiming that people who work at the hospital should be able to speak English! Press Association: The Ukip leader claimed that “people out there are talking about” GPs not speaking good enough English but the NHS careers website clearly states that registered doctors must pass a test under the International English Language Testing System. Farage made his claim as he defended Ukip’s policy to stop people who do not speak good English from working in the NHS. He told Sky News’s Murnaghan programme: “Don’t we want to live in a country where we speak the same language? “And isn’t it scandalous that we are not training enough nurses and doctors in our own country? “I don’t know about you, whether you’ve ever been to a GP that didn’t speak very good English, and it’s something that people out there are talking about.” First it’s “well people treating you medically should speak the same language as you” and then – BOOM – the rhetoric shifts almost immediately to “GAS THE KIKES – RACE WAR NOW!” We have seen this same pattern in history exactly six million times. Nigel Farage should be charged now with operating gas chambers because even though he hasn’t done it yet there is no other thing which he could do based on his ideology.

I’ll take “Black People” for $500, Alex… Posted: 05 Jan 2015 10:01 AM PST Stuff Black People Don’t Like January 5, 2015 Answer: “What is causing Indy’s rise in homicides?” Sadly, no “Double Jeopardy.” [What is causing Indy's rise in homicides?, Indy Star, 1-4-15]: Patricia Ladd has lived in the Martindale-Brightwood neighborhood for seven decades. For much of that time, the retired schoolteacher said, crime was not a problem. But these days, Ladd said, her husband won’t let her walk outside their home at night. And there are some parts of her beloved neighborhood where Ladd now refuses to drive — including the intersection of 25th Street and Dearborn Avenue. That’s where an 84-year-old neighbor and her 30-year-old granddaughter were gunned down in May. Ladd’s neighbor Julia Morrow and Morrow’s granddaughter, Inity Morrow, were among the 135 women, men and children who were killed in criminal homicides in Indianapolis in 2014. The tally is the highest since 2006 and represents an 8 percent increase from the 125 criminal homicides in 2013. The city’s top law enforcement officials blame the escalation in criminal killings on a toxic mix of drugs, gangs, guns in the wrong hands, poverty and mental illness. They also insist that Indianapolis remains a safe city. “If you live in Indianapolis and you’re not using drugs, you’re not breaking the law, you’re not carrying a gun illegally, (then) your chances of being in a homicide are very low,” said Public Safety Director Troy Riggs. Riggs said criminal history was a common thread tying together homicide suspects and their victims. Even so, Riggs acknowledged, the uptick in homicides for the second consecutive year — after four years with fewer than 100 homicides — is disturbing. On Feb. 22, four people were killed during what officials believe was a botched robbery at a Southeastside drug house. IMPD officials said the suspects, including alleged triggerman Cody Rackemann, were after drug money and the group’s own narcotics, including heroin. A month later, three other people were killed during a late-night shooting at a Shoreland Court apartment building. Court documents released after the Dec. 19 arrests of two suspects in the killings suggested they might also have been drug-related. Several of those involved in those homicides — including every victim and all but one suspect in February’s quadruple homicide — had previously faced drug-related or violent criminal charges. They aren’t unique. Riggs said more than 80 percent of homicide victims in 2014 had a criminal past, and more than 40 percent of both the victims and their killers had faced previous gun-related charges. “There are hardly any new players in these homicides,” Hite said. The 2014 victims were predominantly — and disproportionately — young, black males. Almost 80 percent were African-American and 82 percent were males. Seventy percent were younger than 30. But who is doing the killing? The Indianapolis Star doesn’t address this, so we will for them: individual black people, collectively working to cause the rise in Indy’s homicides.

Disgusting Monkeys Ruin the Meals of Random Whites with Aggressive Harassment Posted: 05 Jan 2015 09:51 AM PST Andrew Anglin Daily Stormer January 5, 2015 #WarOnBrunch has to be a /pol/ meme A million years of social justice and Boasian university brainwashing cannot change the biological reality of what Black people are.  Even if every single human being on earth were brainwashed into doubting their lying eyes in order to conform to Jew-invented social norms, the objective reality that Black people are stinking, ugly, aggressive monkey-people would no one enjoys being around in large numbers would remain. But far from moving toward believing the social justice line, the emerging Black revolutionary movement is pushing normal people toward believing their own lying eyes: Blacks are nigh completely intolerable and have literally no redeeming qualities (note: an individual Black might have redeeming qualities, Blacks as a racial group do not). Recently, large groups of Whites got a serious wake up call with regards to the fabled “equality of man” when Blacks aggressively invaded their meals and shopping experiences on both coasts demanding… well, no one actually knows what Blacks are demanding.  They want to be able to attack cops and not get arrested for committing crimes, and… yeah, no, honestly, no one seems to know what else they want.  It is worse than Occupy Wall Street.  Because, you know, they’re Black. In a meme that seriously could just as easily have come from /pol/ ala “#EndFathersDay, they have launched a war on brunch to end White supremacy. An ugly Paki bitch who calls herself Sharmin Ultra (here’s her Twitter) is a major leader in this “Black Brunch” movement, apparently. Remember a Sandmonkey ran a large part of the Ferguson protests. Blacks literally cannot run their own riots and will just go home and watch TV after like three hours if there isn’t some mixed race person there pushing them to keep going by reminding them of the feelings. There’s ugly, there’s dog-faced ugly, there’s Alan Dershowitz, then there’s this Sharmin Ultra bitch.  Can you imagine the density of the hair on her back?  SRSLY BRO.  No wonder she hates White people and loves Blacks – Whites remind her she isn’t a human being while Blacks make her feel like she is one! And on a very real level, this sort of nullifies the whole thing, as Blacks are claiming they deserve things because of slavery (which at least is logical on some level, even if we have already paid them back a hundred fold) – what the hell does this Paki bitch want, and what do we supposedly owe her?  Pakis were never slaves in any country, and the English were so kind and to bring civilization to those savages – something they were never thanked for. Even if the White people who witnessed this brunch invasion try their best to push this out of their minds forever, saying “oh no, no, they have legitimate gripes, they are so oppressed, Professor Goldbergstein told me so,” this event will be lodged in their subconscious minds for the rest of their lives, with the event being recalled whenever they are exposed to Black people and the subconscious mind saying “bro, listen to me bro, these people are your enemy, they came at you before, they want to hurt you bro, you’d better either run or fight these people they want to hurt you they came at you.” Because that is the way the subconscious mind works.  When information is put into it through sensory processes, it logs the information, catalogs it, then stimulates emotional responses through the release of chemicals based on the databases it stores of previous experiences.  As human beings stress levels become more and more extreme, they begin to rely less on their conscious mind and more on the emotional triggers of their subconscious minds.  And this whole Black revolution thing is really stressing people the hell out. Our Job to Make This Worse This is why I support the Black revolution, and continue to encourage people to go on Twitter and elsewhere and manipulate Blacks into engaging in weirder and more aggressive/annoying behavior.  It is fantastic for us that they are doing this, and we must continue to push them.  You people need to get out there on Twitter and other places where there are Blacks on the internet and become their leaders.  These people are so completely stupid, it is easy. Most Whites – even nationalists – don’t truly understand how completely stupid Blacks actually are.  It is noting to confuse and influence them if you speak their language.  Theoretically, you could be arranging entire protests without ever having to leave the comfort of your den as you sit by the fire smoking a pipe and inciting Negroes on the tubes. Soon, when normal Whites hear us say “why don’t they just go back to Africa if they want to be free of White oppression – we will pay them to go!” they are going to be like “yeah… you know… I really am having a hard time finding the flaw in that idea.  Who exactly doesn’t win in that situation?”

Is It Time for Explicit Talk About White Interests in Louisiana? Posted: 05 Jan 2015 09:01 AM PST Kevin MacDonald Occidental Observer January 5, 2015 David Duke is the smiling, friendly face of utter hatred. The speech supposedly given by Rep. Steve Scalise to David Duke's group is now a major national news story (see James Edwards' article). One might think that this could be a teachable moment, but of course the mainstream media is doing everything it can to ensure that it is not. It's just another opportunity to call Duke and anyone with similar views "White Supremacists" or "Neo-Nazis." The Washington Post headline is typical: "House Majority Whip Scalise confirms he spoke to white supremacists in 2002." The New York Times refers to Duke  as "the former Klansman and white supremacist who two decades ago was almost elected Louisiana governor." CNN labels him "a notorious white supremacist." The video on the CNN page achieves the trifecta: "White supremacist," "neo-Nazi," and "former Ku Klux Klan leader" — as well as a statement from Jewish ethnonationalist and pro-Israel fanatic Charles Krauthammer saying that Scalise should resign from his leadership position. The Daily Caller  which bills itself as a conservative site, also used the "white supremacist" label. The "white supremacist" phrase is particularly galling. This is a very effective term of art invented by the left to pathologize any sense that White people have interests like everyone else. Israel is already a de facto Jewish state, but we never hear about Jewish supremacists in the Western media. No one labels Koreans as Korean supremacists if they oppose displacement-level immigration from Africa because they desire their country to remain Korean. That the label is routinely used so effectively in the U.S. media is telling testimony to the power of the anti-White left. White conservatives are terrified to be tarred with the label. As a result, policies that in fact would benefit Whites can never be advertised as such — so White politicians necessarily become adept at phrasing their implicitly White policies in terms of abstractions like "big government." Indeed, the NYTimes article claims that  in his 1991 run for governor, Duke avoided explicit talk about White racial interests. He "told voters he regretted being 'too intolerant' in his youth and said he would not disown his daughters if they brought home an African-American or Jewish boyfriend. Instead, he focused on anti-big government and anti-tax mantras that preceded the Tea Party movement." He also advocated implicitly pro-White policies like forcing welfare recipients to take birth control.  And after being elected to the state House of Representatives in 1989, Duke proposed "measures implementing stricter guidelines for residents of public housing, repealing affirmative action programs and eliminating minority set-asides" — policies obviously aimed at benefiting the White majority. The fact is, however, that Duke's political positions in the early 1990s are now part of the mainstream and reflect the steadily increasing racialization of American politics resulting from massive non-White immigration — exacerbated in Louisiana by the history of racial politics. As the NYTimes article notes, in his 1991 campaign for governor against Edwin W. Edwards, Mr. Duke largely avoided explicitly racial campaigning, appealed to the frustrations and resentments of white voters and won more than 60 percent of the white vote while losing in a runoff election. Two decades later, much of his campaign has merged with the political mainstream here, and rather than a bad memory from the past, Mr. Duke remains a window into some of the murkier currents in the state's politics where Republicans have sought and eventually won Mr. Duke's voters, while turning their back on him. Throughout the U.S., White people are increasingly voting on the basis of their racial identity rather than their social class, and this trend is even more pronounced in Louisiana than many other areas. The same NYTimes article quotes a Louisiana political analyst noting that in the recent senatorial election the Democrat candidate, Mary Landrieu, carried only 18 percent of the white vote, while the Republican candidate, Bill Cassidy, captured just 5 percent of the black vote. Obviously racial polarization in Louisiana has increased since the 1990s. A similar level of racial polarization throughout the country would result in total Republican domination. But, more importantly,  it also suggests that, at least in Louisiana, it would not fatally damage a White politician in a district with a clear White majority to make explicit appeals to White identity and White interests. Indeed, it may well be the case that an explicit appeal to White interests would be a good strategy  in a primary election against another White Republican who spouted diversity mantras even while appealing to implicit Whiteness on policy issues. Indeed, the NYTimes article notes that Duke's "decision to run to the right of the field is now a common maneuver in Louisiana's open primary system." The 82-18 split among White voters is a clear indication that the great majority of Whites are voting on the basis of their racial identity, not their social class or other factors. With a divergence so great, the only Whites voting Democrat are deluded college professors and other readers of the New York Times, social misfits, and low-information Whites who continue to be captivated by media messages emanating from Hollywood. I suggest it is very unlikely that the great majority of these Whites are going to be intimidated and guilt-tripped by the deluge of charges of "racism" and "White supremacism" that a campaign phrased in terms of explicit Whiteness would elicit from the mainstream media. Such people are simply not going to vote for the party of Al Sharpton, La Raza, and Elizabeth Warren. Duke was clearly ahead of his times in promoting policies that appeal to the White majority of Louisiana, even though he got over 60% of the White vote in the 1991 election despite hostility from the Louisiana media, a deluge of out-of-state money to the opposition, and even threats that factories and jobs would leave Louisiana if he was elected. It's a different atmosphere now than in 1991. I suggest that it's time for an explicit appeal to White interests in states and congressional districts with lopsided majorities of Whites voting Republican. Metapolitics is all well and good. But with such large White majorities, more direct options should be explored. The election of an explicitly White politician to statewide or federal office would be, to quote Ben Wattenberg out of context, "heartening news of an almost transcendental quality." And if the national Republican party blocks the nomination of explicitly pro-White candidates, it's definitely time for a third party.

The Future Belongs to Us Posted: 05 Jan 2015 08:51 AM PST Heresy January 5, 2015 The title of this post refers to a remark made by Dutch politician Geert Wilders in a speech before the Congress of the Front National, in Lyon, France. Geert Wilders, Dutch (and European) Patriot To clarify, the Front National is the Nationalist party that is fighting for the survival of the French nation, and they are currently the most popular political party in all of France. In his speech, Wilders proclaimed that “The future belongs to the Patriots of Europe! Because the peoples of Europe have had enough of betrayal by the multicultural elites who destroy our identities and our traditions.” In this post, I will be commenting on a number of other statements that Wilders made in this speech. But before I begin, I would like to address a couple of points that are pertinent to this discussion. 1) Who is Geert Wilders? Wilders is the leader of the Dutch Party for Freedom, the political party that is currently leading the polls in the Netherlands.  He is an outspoken critic of Islam and its effect on Dutch culture. Wilders travels throughout the Western world, warning of the dangers of mass immigration and the Islamisation of the West. Consequently, Wilders is under around-the-clock security protection due to frequent threats against his life by Islamists in the Netherlands. He does not want to meet the same fate as Theo van Gogh, a descendant of the famous painter Vincent, who was assassinated in 2004 following a film he directed regarding the treatment of women in Islamic nations. He was shot dead in broad daylight by a “Dutch” Muslim, who also attempted to decapitate van Gogh.  As you can see, the Netherlands is a dangerous place for Heretics who dare to criticize the ‘Religion of Peace’. 2) Why does this matter to Americans? (source) As a large majority of my readers are American, you may be wondering why most of my focus is on Europe, rather than the United States.  There are a couple of reasons for this. First, Political Correctness has completely broken down in Europe.  Mainstream European politicians are making statements, that in America, would cause them to be forced to apologize to Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, resign from office, and face social ostracism in their public life.  Their lives would essentially be ruined. Second, I am seeking to provide an example for American patriots to follow.  We must look to our brothers and sisters in Europe for guidance and instruction in combating the forces which seek to destroy our heritage, culture, and identity.  Europeans are no longer afraid of speaking out for their people and the survival of their nations.  We must adopt the same mindset if we are to survive as a nation.  The 2014 elections proved that, like Europe, we are shifting to the right as a nation.  Indeed, 2015 must be the year that we break free from the Politically Correct narrative and state loud and clear that we are proud Americans, and that we will do whatever it takes to restore the Constitution and the Republic that it created.  We must not be afraid to confront the traitors who have silenced us for so long. (source) The Speech Wilders: “We don’t want foreigners who come to our country to tell us that they are the masters of our house.  We say: send criminals, jihadists, illegal immigrants OUT OF THE COUNTRY.  And all those who refuse to adapt to our values, expel them and never let them back! Because the only masters in the Netherlands are the Dutch, just as the only masters in France are the French.” And, indeed, the Americans are the masters of America.  Not the illegal immigrants and their sponsors within both parties and the corporate interests that control them.  If our corrupt government can not secure our borders, we must replace them with a new government that will.  After all, that is their job. American jobs are for the sons and daughters of those brave souls who secured our land with their blood, sweat, and tears, not H-1B immigrants who are brought to Silicon Valley by the Zuckerbergs’ and Gates’ who seek to replace American tech workers with cheaper alternatives. Instead of devoting time and money in finding foreign workers to replace us, how about you spend that time and money to train American workers to fill those positions?  As of November 2014, there are 92.5 million Americans out of the labor force. I suggest that we invest in them, rather than people who have never contributed anything to this country. Wilders: “We defend our country, we defend our flag, we defend our heritage, we defend our nation.  And we must constantly strive to reclaim our homelands from the spiral of mass immigration and out of the clutches of the hypocritical and allegedly multicultural elite.”  This statement exemplifies the attitude that Americans must adopt if we are to survive as a nation, as a people, and as a force for good in the world, rather than an empire that causes civil unrest throughout the world in order to protect the financial interests of the elites who have hijacked our government. Communists, Marxists, and other assorted leftists are willing to take to the streets in America to further their ideology (see Michael Brown & Eric Garner protests).  Unless American Patriots adopt the same sense of urgency, the same commitment to their values, and the same willingness to speak out and make their voice heard, the American experiment will surely die a slow, cold death. (source) Will 2015 be the year we get off the couch? The year we get off the internet message boards?  Will it be the year that we take radical action to preserve the American ideals of freedom, liberty, and traditional family values? If we are not willing to fight for our ideals, we deserve to be consumed in the Socialist cesspool that America has become.  Our politicians will not simply wake up one day and decide, “I’m going to fight for America.”  None of our politicians, with the exception of a few (Jeff Sessions, Mike Lee, Tim Scott, Ted Cruz) would ever dare to speak in a Patriotic manner as Geert Wilders and other European politicians do. It is up to us.  If we fight for our ideals, for our heritage, and for our homeland, the future belongs to us.

Black Gunman Gets Life for Killing White Father During a Verbal Dispute Posted: 05 Jan 2015 08:48 AM PST PNJ January 5, 2015 Inside and outside a Pensacola courtroom Friday, two families wept for the lost lives of two young men. The family of Michael Harris wept tears of relief that justice had been done in slaying of the father of two from Milton. The family of Damarcus Jenkins cried tears of grief for the 22-year-old who will spend life in prison for Harris’ murder. Jenkins was sentenced Friday for fatally shooting Harris during a 2013 altercation on Pensacola Beach. Jenkins came upon Harris and Harris’ girlfriend while they were quarreling near the Casino Beach parking lot. When Jenkins tried to break up the altercation, he and Harris reportedly got into a verbal dispute. Witnesses said Jenkins produced a weapon and shot Harris multiple times, including at least one shot while Harris was on the ground. An Escambia County jury found Jenkins guilty of second-degree murder in December, and during Friday’s sentencing, Circuit Judge E.P. Nickinson opted for a sentence well above Jenkins’ mandatory minimum of 25 years. Jenkins was sentenced to life for the murder. “If there was some argument that he was trying to help a young woman who was being beaten by someone, there was a sheriff’s substation right there in earshot. … A couple of moments of reflection would have stopped this,” Nickinson said. Jenkins’ attorney, Gene Mitchell, asked Nickinson to consider mitigating factors such as the fact that both men were highly intoxicated and that Jenkins thought he was acting in self defense. However, Harris’ family asked in no uncertain terms that Jenkins receive a life sentence. “His children will never feel their father’s love again,” said Lisa Nelson, Harris’ mother. “I can’t imagine how much torment that causes them, but I know the torment it causes me. My family and I, Michael’s friends, we’re all sentenced to a lifetime already.” Jenkins was on probation at the time of the shooting and was also sentenced to three concurrent years in prison for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He also has a separate case pending for violation of probation.

Iceland to Withdraw EU Application Posted: 05 Jan 2015 08:39 AM PST Daily Stormer January 5, 2015 “When we see pictures of Iceland, we think ‘wow what utterly meaningless, boring, cultureless fascism. Needs more Muslims and Africans.” -Angela “Mama Pug” Merkel on Iceland Apparently, Iceland has decided they don’t want to be a part of the EU. This is probably a very good call. Why would any country that isn’t poverty stricken ever want to be a part of the EU in the first place? EUOBSERVER: Despite public protests, Iceland's PM Gunnlaugsson plans to for­mally with­draw the coun­try’s EU ap­pli­ca­tion early in the new year, he told Ice­landic ra­dio sta­tion Byl­g­jan on Sun­day. First steps of removing cap­i­tals con­trols, in place since the fi­nan­cial cri­sis hit Iceland in 2008, would likely be taken as well. Here are some pictures of Iceland. It is very easy to see that the country has utterly failed, due to the lack of Mosques upindismuffugguh.

Wealth Gap Widens as Welfare Use Soars Under Black Communist Leader Posted: 05 Jan 2015 08:20 AM PST James Kirkpatrick VDARE January 5, 2015 Typical welfare users – there are more of these now and no one can figure out why The central fact of our political system is that our leaders have no interest in actually solving any of our problems.  Instead, they actively benefit from social dysfunction and strive to import new sources of discontent. Thus, increased welfare usage isn't a problem — it's the System working as planned.  After all, our government goes out of its way to enroll foreigners in our welfare programs at Mexican Consulates. Thus, the Washington Times starts this article with a misleading statement — As Barack Obama enters the twilight of his presidency, he presides over an America vastly different from the one he envisioned building during his 2008 campaign that promised to empower everyday Americans on Main Street over wealthy bankers and investors on Wall Street. [Obama economy: Welfare dependency peaks during Obama presidency as rich get richer, by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, January 4, 2015] Nonsense.  This is precisely what he had in mind.  After all, the wealthy are the ones donating to the Democrats.  [Editorial: Money buys elections? Democrats outraise GOP, get shellacked, Las Vegas Review-Journal, January 3, 2015]  And each one of those dependent voters, after being carefully taught he or she is a victim, is a lifetime voter for big government. Six years into his agenda, Wall Street is roaring higher than ever, with the Dow topping out over 18,000 for the first time recently and the top 10 percent of wealthy Americans amassing wealth at a double-digit pace. But on Main Street large numbers of Americans have dropped from the job market, middle-class wages are stagnant, and even larger numbers of Americans are now dependent on some form of government subsidy for disability, jobless benefits or food stamps. Even data from the president's signature legislative accomplishment provides warning signs about the health of Main Street: More than four out of five Americans who got new health insurance under Obamacare did so with a government subsidy. Experts say forces in the macroeconomy, coupled with Mr. Obama's aggressive regulatory agenda, have left the promise of a more robust Main Street in shambles… The percent of Americans in the workforce — either working or seeking work — remained steady, at around 66 percent during the Bush presidency. But under Mr. Obama it has plummeted from 65.7 percent the month he took office in January 2009 to just 62.8 percent in November. That translates to more than 7 million fewer workers in the workforce. That drop is artificially lowering the unemployment rate, some economists argue. Part of the frustration for working-class Americans is their plight has worsened — with lower income and stock investments — while the wealthy's opportunity has improved. A 2013 Pew Research study of U.S. Census Bureau data found simply that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer during the Obama economic recovery. What's the missing word in all of this analysis?  You guessed it.  "Immigration."

FEMEN Comes to Greece Specifically to Fight Golden Dawn Posted: 05 Jan 2015 06:34 AM PST XA Ameriki January 5, 2015 Femen have announced that they are going to Greece to fight against Golden Dawn. An announcement of readiness has been made by Femen, timed to coincide with the collapse of the Samaras government, for a project in Greece. The "activism" of these "women" is not targeted at bringing attention to the grave poverty and injustice millions are suffering in Greece, the target is of course: Golden Dawn. The puppets of globalization and neo-liberalism have expressed that their campaign is geared at provoking the People's Association. Statements by an "activist" have said that "Greece belongs to the list of countries considered strategically important, due to the rise of the extreme right in these territories". They will come and bring their moronic side-show. The only recruits they will find are the anarchist junkies in Exarchia, who will at worst upset the stomachs of Greeks. It's worth noting that major figures in the Greek capitalist/mainstream media originally put out the invitation to Femen to help them fight Golden Dawn.  The alleged "anti-fascist" and "anti-racist" movement is nothing more than a protective mechanism for the thieves at the top.

Jew Media and SJWs Attack Christian Mother After Her Mentally Ill Son Commits Suicide Posted: 05 Jan 2015 05:11 AM PST Sven Longshanks Daily Stormer January 5, 2015 Carla Alcorn has bravely spoken to the media for the first time since the death of her son, despite them blaming her for his death. The mother of the recently deceased teenager with gender disorder has bravely refused to give in to the sickening taunts of the degenerate political left and Jew media who have been attacking her while she is still struggling to come to terms with her mentally ill son's death. Carla Alcorn of Kings Mills, Ohio refused to play along with the Jewish media and insisted on calling her son 'he' during her recent interview with CNN, where she reaffirmed the fact that gender disorder is not something that any responsible parent would ever want to encourage. “We don’t support that, religiously” she said, “But we told him that we loved him unconditionally. We loved him no matter what. I loved my son. People need to know that I loved him. He was a good kid, a good boy.” By attacking this poor woman and blaming her for the death of her own son, we see just how low our enemies are prepared to stoop, in their quest to revive Sodom and Gomorrah in modern times. The interviewer even had the audacity to ask the mother why she and her husband did not allow their teenage son to have his genitals cut off. The boy killed himself and has now been made into an anti-saint by the transgender movement. Besides not having the money to waste on such an abominable vanity, Carla explained that they were both devout Christians who had been trying their hardest to prevent their son from even learning about such obscene things. In fact it had been a wish to stop him from viewing inappropriate material, that had inspired them to ban him from using social media in the first place. This story serves to show just how hard it is for parents to protect their children from the degeneracy of the modern world. Even ones as dedicated and as caring as these, were still not able to prevent their son from being turned to the dark side. The boy was obviously unbalanced and delusional, as he had never even mentioned thinking he was transgender before, until two months before he killed himself. Yet instead of realising that and thinking of the poor family that are grieving, all the Jewish media can think of is using this tragedy to push forward their own twisted agenda, no matter how many lives they destroy in the process.

You are subscribed to email updates from Daily Stormer To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States