firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
firewall-wizards-request@listserv.icsalabs.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
firewall-wizards-owner@listserv.icsalabs.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of firewall-wizards digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: PIX access-list help (Brian Blater)
2. Re: Anyone have any informed opinions on the Watchguard
product line? (Jim Seymour)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:07:37 -0500
From: "Brian Blater" <brb.lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] PIX access-list help
To: "Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List"
<firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com>
Message-ID:
<7743536a0712261007ic01f92fm562685817ecd9e0a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Dec 25, 2007 12:25 AM, Paul Melson <pmelson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007 11:02 AM, Brian Blater <brb.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So, my main question, is there an access list command I can have that
> > basically says "allow all communication from the dmz to the internet"
> > and one that says "allow communication from the inside to the dmz"? I
> > know I can add "access-list dmz permit ip host 192.168.1.1 any" and
> > that solves the problem of getting to the internet, but then it opens
> > all communication to the inside from this host and I don't want to do
> > that. Since this is version 6.3(3) I can't use an out access-list
> > which I think might solve the problem. I have enough memory to run
> > version 7.x on this PIX, but I'm trying to tackle one problem at a
> > time and I'm a little hesitant about doing the 7.x upgrade just yet.
>
> The short answer to your question is that PIX access-lists are read,
> per-interface, top-to-bottom:
>
> access-list dmz_in deny ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
> access-list dmz_in permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 any
> access-group dmz_in in interface dmz
>
> If your internal network is 10.0.0.0/8 and your DMZ is 192.168.1.0/24,
> this will prevent traffic from the DMZ to the inside, but allow
> everything else.
>
> PaulM
>
Ok, I think I understand this a little better now. Say my private
network is 192.168.1.0/24 and my dmz is 192.168.2.0/24. I already have
the static (inside,dmz) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
which is required in 6.3(3). So, in order to make this work i.e the
inside network has access to everything on the dmz network and the dmz
network can access the internet and I only allow specific
communication from the dmz to the inside I need to do the following:
access-list dmz permit udp host 192.168.2.2 host 192.168.1.202 eq domain
access-list dmz permit tcp host 192.168.2.2 host 192.168.1.203 eq smtp
access-list dmz deny ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list dmz permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 any
I will also need to add the nonat statements as was suggested by Brandon:
access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat 0 (inside) access-list nonat
nat 0 (dmz) access-list nonat
My only concern here is the 3rd line in the dmz access-list and
whether it will deny communication from the inside network to the dmz
(except dns and smtp), but I will test that when I get home tonight.
Thank you for everyone's help.
Brian
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:23:14 -0500 (EST)
From: jseymour@linxnet.com (Jim Seymour)
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Anyone have any informed opinions on the
Watchguard product line?
To: firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
Message-ID: <20071226162314.E4BC9E158@jimsun.linxnet.com>
"Richard Golodner" <rgolodner@infratection.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
> There was also a nice GUI interface ...
[snip]
Is that still limited to running on a Windows PC?
I believe their management GUI once ran on both Windows and Linux.
Then, later, on Windows only, I was told. I tend to shun network
infrastructure products that require Windows to configure and
administer them.
Jim
--
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at <http://jimsun.linxnet.com/contact/scform.php>.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
End of firewall-wizards Digest, Vol 20, Issue 13
************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment