Daily Stormer |
- Jew Jonah Goldberg Mourns the Fact That SJWs are “Creating a Generation of Fascists”
- Lena Dunham’s Rape Hoax Now Collapsing
- How Skepticism Spread About the Rolling Stone Rape Hoax
- Jew Extremist Says Moslem Immigration will be the Death of Europe
- Yes, There is Most Definitely a Rape Culture in the UK
- Black Thief Gets 25 Years for Cold Blooded Murder of Gentle White Bar Owner
- Radio 3Fourteen: Mark Hackard – Dostoevsky and Strategies of Subversion
- Microsoft Vows to Meet the Outrageous Demands of Jesse Jackson
- Watson’s Nobel Prize Sold at Christie’s for $4 Million
- Bloomberg Claims Sweden is Leading the Anti-Immigration Push in Europe
| Jew Jonah Goldberg Mourns the Fact That SJWs are “Creating a Generation of Fascists” Posted: 06 Dec 2014 10:52 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Jonah Goldberg: “Right-wing” Jew gatekeeper attempting to hold back the floodgates and keep the right-wing movement from going full Nazi. Jonah Goldberg has rewritten a blog, reposted over at Thought Catalog, mourning the fact that vicious Social Justice Warriors are creating a generation of fascists. The whole thing is well worth reading, if only for the lolzy screens.  Is it a real SJW or a /pol/ troll. There is no way of knowing and it doesn’t matter. After doing a pretty decent job in outlining the whole SJW mindset (from a “moderate liberal” perspective, mind you) epitomized on Tumblr, and mentioning both /pol/ and Stormfront, he closes with this:
There is a lot of truth there. At least I hope there is. However, the Jew lie which goes through the entire article is that this is somehow “not real liberalism.” In reality, it is the obvious conclusion of liberalism, which was always Marxism, which was always about destruction of the great for the benefit of the weak. There is nowhere else this could have ended up, and there was never a solution to Marxism other than us. I am overjoyed that it is finally happening. We are justified. |
| Lena Dunham’s Rape Hoax Now Collapsing Posted: 06 Dec 2014 07:37 AM PST Eugene Gant
As the highly-suspect gang rape tale at University of Virginia continues imploding, another one is joining it. Breitbart's Big Hollywood has eviscerated leftist Lena Dunham's story about her Republican rapist at Oberlin College. National Review's Kevin Williamson bloodied the story in October. Crazed feminist Amanda Marcotte compared people investigating these slanders to Holocaust deniers.['Like Holocaust Denialism': Slate Writer Slams Breitbart Over Dunham Investigative Piece, by John Nolte December 4, 2014] Big Hollywood finishes the job. No such person as Dunham described exists, but the man Dunham named has hidden his Facebook page and has hired a lawyer.  Great point. It pretty much is the exact same thing. |
| How Skepticism Spread About the Rolling Stone Rape Hoax Posted: 06 Dec 2014 07:24 AM PST Steve Sailer  But it was real… in her mind. On November 19th, Rolling Stone posted "A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Search for Justice at UVA" to immense acclaim. On November 24th, veteran editor Richard Bradley asked on his personal blog Shots in the Dark "Is the Rolling Stone Story True?" Below are the only comments made on Bradley's post before I linked to his post on November 29th, after which the floodgates opened. 351 Responses
Then, my readers followed up with numerous insightful comments on Bradley's blog on November 29th and 30th. On December 1st, articles started appearing citing Bradley's post in places like Reason, the WSJ, and Jonah Goldberg's column in the L.A. Times. From December 2nd, onward, the Washington Post took the lead, actually doing new shoe leather reporting. The New York Times, however, published only one wishy-washy story about doubts, then on December 4th published a long article on the supposed rape culture crisis on campus and in the military, credulously citing the Rolling Stone story repeatedly. Today, Rolling Stone has apologized for the article and the Washington Post has much new reporting about it. So score one for the WaPo over the NYT. And here's my Taki's Magazine article from earlier this week "A Rape Hoax for Book Lovers." |
| Jew Extremist Says Moslem Immigration will be the Death of Europe Posted: 06 Dec 2014 07:09 AM PST Daily Stormer  Mordechai Kedar: A helpful Jew. Hey, thanks for the heads up on this one, Jew.
|
| Yes, There is Most Definitely a Rape Culture in the UK Posted: 06 Dec 2014 05:41 AM PST Andrew Anglin This culture coincides with a culture of rat-facedness. YouTube description:
|
| Black Thief Gets 25 Years for Cold Blooded Murder of Gentle White Bar Owner Posted: 06 Dec 2014 04:32 AM PST WKBW  Jim Cottone was the popular owner of a restaurant, but that inevitably brought him into contact with Blacks. The western New York man convicted of killing a prominent Kenmore bar owner was sentenced Thursday morning to 25 years to life in prison. It has been nearly one and a half years since the slaying of 62-year-old Vincent James Cottone, known as “Jim” to his loved ones, shook a neighborhood in the Village of Kenmore. Cottone was found stabbed to death in his home on Landers Road. Cottone’s cousin, Toni Barrone, asked Judge Russell Buscaglia for the maximum sentence, calling the crime “cold blooded murder.” In court, Barrone remembered her cousin as a gentle person. “Since he was a young boy, he had big dreams, and he did everything he could to realize those dreams.” One of those dreams was owning a restaurant. Cottone owned Malone’s Bar and Grill, a popular restaurant located right around the corner from his house.  Antonio Martin-Brown was sentenced to 25 years for the cold-blooded murder. Judge Buscaglia found Antonio Martin-Brown guilty of second degree murder. Martin-Brown had been caught stealing an $800 check from Cottone’s house. Prosecutors say Martin-Brown murdered Cottone just 36 hours after the victim went to police about the stolen money. “This was to silence the victim,” said Frank Sedita, the Erie County District Attorney. “This is a straight out, premeditated, intentional, vicious murder.” The defense tried to argue a case of extreme emotional disturbance, by claiming that Martin-Brown and Cottone had been lovers. However, Buscaglia never bought the defense. Martin-Brown had waived his right to a jury trial. He was sentenced Thursday morning to 25 years to life in prison. He will also serve one year in prison for petit larceny. |
| Radio 3Fourteen: Mark Hackard – Dostoevsky and Strategies of Subversion Posted: 06 Dec 2014 02:30 AM PST Lana Lokteff
Mark Hackard is an independent foreign policy analyst. He earned a BA in Russian Language from Georgetown University and an MA in Russian, Eastern European and Eurasian Studies from Stanford University. Mark's online project The Soul of the East is to ensure the valuable aspects of Russian political and religious thought are made available to English speakers. We'll discuss the Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky and his encounters with liberalism, socialism and revolution. Mark tells about Dostoevsky's time in Petrashevsky Circle, followed by his experience in a Siberian prison camp, and then his stance after his release from exile. We switch focus to discuss the novel Demons, which Mark calls Dostoevsky’s great counter-revolutionary novel where he portrays ideas and ideological foundations as demonic. Further, we discuss dialectics and the strategy of tension. We'll discuss how the dialectic is used by revolutionaries to drive society in a specific direction. Mark points out that Dostoevsky's novels were prophetic. Mark describes how liberalism leads to tyranny, pondering the thoughts of Plato who described how democracy leads to tyranny. Later, we'll contemplate Dostoevsky and Nietzsche's concepts of a Superman or Übermensch. Moving on, we'll discuss how the west has embraced disembodied distractions and as Dostoevsky would say, the plan is to turn us into an obedient herd of sub-humans. We end on the American experiment and weaponized ideologies currently in action, invented by the elite for control purposes. Websites: Dostoevsky's Secret War, Dostoevsky’s Political Thought |
| Microsoft Vows to Meet the Outrageous Demands of Jesse Jackson Posted: 06 Dec 2014 01:00 AM PST Daily Stormer  Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. He’s from India. Haven’t you heard, goyim? Monkeyman is exactly the same as normalman, meaning he is very good at computers. Monkeyman only doesn’t do good at computers because you hold him down to hurt his feelings on purpose for no reason. It is normalman’s fault monkeyman cannot be doing good on computers. It’s time for a change!
 Bodda bees poppenov upindis muffeggeh |
| Watson’s Nobel Prize Sold at Christie’s for $4 Million Posted: 06 Dec 2014 12:45 AM PST Daily Stormer  James D. Watson received the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1962. He was forced to sell it after having been damned by the whole world for daring to state the obvious fact that Blacks have lower intelligence than other races. Let this be a lesson to all the naughty little goyims who think about questioning the indisputable baseless assertion that all human beings are exactly the same in every possible way.
This is what happens when you question Jew “science.” No matter what you’ve done in your life, they humiliate and destroy you. |
| Bloomberg Claims Sweden is Leading the Anti-Immigration Push in Europe Posted: 06 Dec 2014 12:24 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Dear Europe: Is this really what you wanted? Bloomberg has published an interesting article entitled “Sweden — Yes, Sweden — Leads Anti-Immigration Shift” by a Mr. Leonid Bershidsky. Below are the good bits.
Don’t know what to make of this. Typical Jew gibberish, I suppose. Doesn’t really seem to be backing up the article’s title very well. Most anti-immigrant parties across Europe are all right around the 13% mark, give or take, with the exceptions of Front National and UKIP who are doing much better. Interesting that he admits that immigration is what causes anti-immigration sentiment. Pretty well destroys any chance at having an argument right there, but he doesn’t care, because none of these people have any intention of presenting arguments. At the end he mentions these mythical “benefits of diversity,” but as is always the case – in literally every article which uses that phrase – these alleged benefits are merely alluded to without being spelled out.  Benefits of diversity  Benefits of diversity  Benefits of diversity  Benefits of diversity  Benefits of diversity  Benefits of diversity  Benefits of diversity The fact is that no benefits exist. The only reason Europeans support immigration is that they have developed pathological altruism, where they feel it is their duty to destroy themselves in an attempt to benefit poor non-White people. The best we can hope for from all of these nationalist parties is that they present the opportunity for a real discussion about what we are doing by bringing all of these people into our countries. Women will not be useful here, at all, because they are going on emotion completely (generally, women without children support immigration, women with children are much less likely to do so). But if men were allowed to be presented with the basic facts of the situation, without all of the accusations of “racism,” then it would be conceivable that we could move forward. The opposition literally has nothing to support their argument, at all. They don’t even really have an argument. All they have is name-calling and the ability to silence anyone who questions them through instruments of political repression. The bottom line of all of this is that if immigration continues, there is absolutely nothing which can happen other than for Europe to become a Moslem Caliphate. No one can argue with that. They have simply been capable of avoiding this elephant in the room up until this point. If the conversation is allowed to take place, at least the people will be able to decide whether they really wish to destroy thousands of years of culture and heritage, along with millions of years of genetic development, to destroy any chance whatsoever the youth of Europe have to have a future, for no clear reason. A conversation would give us the opportunity to turn this all back on them: Does this generation really have a right to cause Europe to become a Moslem Caliphate? Where did it get this right? Who determined that one generation should have the ability to destroy an entire people – many peoples – in order that they might feel good about themselves? |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Daily Stormer To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
