Everything related to Computer Security - Security Audits, Security Vulnerabilities, Intrusion Detection, Incident Handling, Forensics and Investigation, Information Security Policies, and a whole lot more.
It is almost always the protesters against the right that are getting arrested for engaging in violence. And this is while police are generally told to go more hardcore on the right than the left.
Police arrested 54 people after violence broke out as thousands protested against a ball organised by far-right groups and politicians in the Austrian capital of Vienna, local media reports said on Saturday.
Six policemen also suffered minor injuries at the protests that took place on Friday.
According to estimates, 5,000 – 9,000 people flooded into central Vienna on Friday to denounce the “Akademikerball” (“Academics’ Ball”) at the former imperial winter palace, the Hofburg.
Most of the protesters marched calmly to the slogan “Together against the right” amid heavy police presence.
The ball — part of Vienna’s traditional ball season which is currently in full swing — is organised by the far-right, eurosceptic and anti-immigration Freedom Party (FPOe), the third-largest in parliament. In previous years other European far-right figures have attended including France’s Marine Le Pen.
This year a number of Viennese taxi drivers clubbed together using Facebook to boycott the ball and refuse to take participants to the event.
Funny how the right is supposed to be the big bad wolf, while it is attacked by both the government and all of these faggot antifa groups.
How short the memory. How empty the rhetoric. Just weeks after the largest outpouring of support for "free speech" that Europe has witnessed in recent decades, genuine free speech in Europe finds itself lined up opposite a Jewish firing squad. The Guardianreports that European Jewish leaders, backed by a host of former EU heads of state and government, are preparing to call for pan-European legislation outlawing 'anti-Semitism.'
A panel of four prestigious international experts on constitutional law backed by the Orwellian European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR) have spent the last three years drafting a 12-page document on "tolerance". In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings, and in line with a renewed and intense Jewish drive for complete invulnerability, they are lobbying to have it converted into law in the 28 countries of the EU. The ECTR is typical of the "think-tank" Jewish method of introducing laws without the consent of the people [for other examples see my work on the introduction of laws limiting free speech in Britain, and the work of Brenton Sanderson on the employment of the same method in Australia].
For a long time the ECTR had a non-Jewish public face through the Presidency of Aleksander Kwaśniewski, himself a former President of Poland. But the real engine room of the body lies in the form of its co-Chairman, Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor. Kantor also acts as the President of the European Jewish Congress. When not crossing the continent bleating about 'tolerance,' this individual also advances Jewish interests in his capacity as the President of Moscow's Museum of Avant-Garde Mastery — a dubious establishment dedicated to extolling the disgusting and poisonous art of co-ethnics like Marc Chagall, Chaim Soutine, and Mark Rothko (Rothko is the subject of a 3-part series of TOO articles by Brenton Sanderson). As for the panel of 'experts,' the most influential member is the panel chair – Yoram Dinstein, a "war crimes expert," professor and former president of Tel Aviv university.
The proposal now presented to the EU's 28 countries will make 'anti-Semitism' illegal, as well as criminalizing a host of other activities deemed to be violating fundamental rights on religious, cultural, ethnic and gender grounds. This fits the pattern of Jews padding out legislation in order to muddy the waters and prevent it being too obvious (to the unsuspecting European masses) that the effort is strategic. The 'padding' will criminalize the following:
Any denial of the standard narrative of the Holocaust (even though academics continue to disagree on what exactly this narrative should be, and no total of casualties can ever be deemed totally accurate).
Denial of any commonly acknowledged genocide, apart from that of the Armenians by the Turks. Sucks to be Armenian.
Any and all examples or expressions of 'xenophobia.'
When pursuing a group evolutionary strategy, perhaps the most sacred Holy Grail for the group would be legally preventing any discussion of the group. This new legislation would effectively signal the final defeat of the European struggle against the Jewish evolutionary strategy, since Europeans would relinquish their rights to acknowledge and question the interests, activities and actions of other peoples as a group. The law will create a new crime of "group libel" — public defamation of ethnic, cultural or religious groups. Padding comes in here too, as women's and gay rights would also be covered.
The term 'group libel' will be familiar to readers of my essay on the war on free speech in Britain. The phrase has some pedigree, and is a Jewish concoction, designed for Jewish ends, and pursued with Jewish tactics. I wrote that:
Since 1945, the Board of Deputies of British Jews had also been working on drafting a "group libel law" that it eventually hoped to get passed in Parliament. Efforts to further tighten libel laws were made in 1952 when Jewish M.P. Harold Lever, introduced a Private Members' Bill modifying Britain's libel laws for the first time in over fifty years. However, Lever's efforts were later mauled by a hostile Parliament to such an extent that by the time his Bill became an Act of Parliament, his provisions were not extended, as he and his co-ethnics had hoped, to cover groups. Britain's first legislation containing any such provision as prohibiting 'group libel' was introduced in Parliament by Frank Soskice, the son of David Soskice — a Russian-Jewish revolutionary exile. Scholars Mark Donnelly and Ray Honeyford state that it was Soskice who "drew up the legislation" and "piloted the first Race Relations Act, 1965, through Parliament."
The proposed legislation would also curb, in the wake of the Paris attacks, freedom of expression on purported grounds of "tolerance and security." These terms are the Abracadabra of the modern age — just like that they can pave the way for the abolition of any number of freedoms.
The dubious document pieced together by Kantor, Dinstein and others, argues that:
Tolerance is a two-way street. Members of a group who wish to benefit from tolerance must show it to society at large, as well as to members of other groups and to dissidents or other members of their own group. There is no need to be tolerant to the intolerant. This is especially important as far as freedom of expression is concerned: that freedom must not be abused to defame other groups.
This unelected group of non-Europeans complains that
there's a real threat of another Jewish exodus from Europe. … The only way to fix these problems is deep changes in legislation to protect all, not just Jews. … Antisemitism is clearly part of it, but by no means the thrust of the project. … It's about tolerance and if you expect tolerance, you have to show tolerance. Otherwise it becomes very obnoxious.
But are Europeans really tolerated by those who have come to dwell among them? Are they tolerated by those who wish to impose Sharia law in European schools, towns and cities? Are they tolerated by that obnoxious elite which seeks to re-write European history for its own purposes, or who seek with apparently inexhaustible energy to destroy European culture?
This document, innocuously titled "A European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance," also calls for the criminalization of "overt approval of a totalitarian ideology, xenophobia or anti-Semitism." It will make "education in tolerance" mandatory from elementary school to college, and for the military and the police, while public broadcasting must "devote a prescribed percentage of their programmes to promoting a climate of tolerance". The drafters are currently touring the parliaments of Europe trying to drum up support for a consensus that would get many, if not all, of the proposals turned into law across 28 countries.
Europe's only hope is opposition. At a recent European parliament committee hearing, Dinstein complained that Britain's UK Independence party (UKIP) was strongly opposed, and that Hungary's government "wouldn't touch [the proposals] with a long pole." But the release of the document has been expertly timed to coincide with the Jewish co-opting of the Charlie Hebdo shootings, and the accompanying engineered panic about the status of Europe's Jews. Europe is weak.
If this legislation passes, it may go largely unheralded, and with little opposition. But the date of its passing should be marked, for it will be the date on which Europe abolishes itself.
This is a fantastic (though a bit scattered) historical round-up of what exactly led to the situation we are presently in.
This history has basically been buried from the youth of this country, and apparently forgotten by our parents, who just don’t ever mention it. But what happened was a comprehensive and intricately planned process of bringing down the White race in America.
This plan was of the Jews. The Jews fear the White race above all else, and are constantly attempting to undermine and injure it.
Watching this film, ask yourself: is this why we killed Hitler?
A bus in Jerusalem has this caption in large lettering:
Israel's bus company Egged has accepted this ad in Jerusalem:
"Statement of the kingdom. From the teachings=instructions of the [Lubavitcher] rabbi
The Gentile does not want anything. He waits to be told what the Jew wants!"
Mondoweiss comments:
The Lubavitcher rabbi was Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994). Schneerson died in NY and is buried there. If this ad were on a bus in NY, people would say it was anti-Semitic. But then, it couldn't be on a bus in NY, could it?
Rabbi Schneerson has not gone unnoticed at TOO, thanks especially to Trudie Pert's 4-part series on him. And as I note elsewhere, commenting on a statement by former Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, that "the goyim were born only to serve us," there is clear evidence that such statements are actually quite mainstream in orthodox circles, and as usual, mainstream American conservatives are clueless about the contempt that Schneerson has for them. As Pert points out,
So taken were non-Jewish American conservatives by the "wholesome" Hasids' exemplification of traditional family values, their promotion of prayer in the schools, and their display of religion in the public square that Congress eventually declared April 4, Schneerson's 80th birthday, a National Day of Reflection. In 1983 President Reagan honored the Rebbe with a kosher-catered birthday party at the White House. Linked by satellite to the White House, Schneerson participated in the celebration from Brooklyn. Posthumously he also received the Congressional Medal of Honor.
Here's another statement from Schneerson:
We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of . . . a totally different species. . . . The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world . . . The difference of the inner quality [of the body] . . . is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews]: "their bodies are in vain". . . . An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.
These fundamentalist and ultranationalist groups are not tiny fringe groups, mere relics of traditional Jewish culture. They are widely respected by the Israeli public and by many Jews in the Diaspora. They have a great deal of influence on the Israeli government, especially the Likud governments and the recent government of national unity headed by Ariel Sharon. The members of Gush Emunim constitute a significant percentage of the elite units of the Israeli army, and, as expected on the hypothesis that they are extremely ethnocentric, they are much more willing to treat the Palestinians in a savage and brutal manner than are other Israeli soldiers. All together, the religious parties represent about 25% of the Israeli electorate—a percentage that is sure to increase because of the high fertility of religious Jews and because intensified troubles with the Palestinians tend to make other Israelis more sympathetic to their cause.
Particularly important is the fertility of these groups. The present Israeli government is the most ethnonationlist in its history [still true today], but these trends will be even more pronounced in the future. In the long run, it's going to be increasingly difficult to maintain the illusion of a universalist Jewish ethics no matter how much the [American Jewish Committee] wants to project that image.
Canadians are being asked to give up more of their freedoms to stop immigrants from murdering them.
Just think of how this has gone:
“Hey, we’re going to bring a bunch of people into this country your ancestors built, and give them free everything. Sure, it’s going to cause massive economic turmoil, but it’s going to be so fantastic having all of these new ethnic restaurants, and you’ll love seeing the interesting way these people dress! On top of that, you’ll be helping people that your ancestors oppressed for no reason. It’s a win-win all around. There’s just one catch: they want to murder you all. In order to stop them from doing this, we are going to have to take away all of your basic human freedoms.”
How far are we going to have to go for diversity?
The obvious answer is: all the way. These diversity-mongers will continue to demand we make more and more sacrifices until there is literally nothing left to give.
Canada introduced on Friday new anti-terrorism legislation critics say gives spy agencies sweeping powers that threaten the public’s civil liberties.
The legislation is the Anti-terrorism Act 2015, which Ottawa Citizen reporter Ian MacLeod described as “the most dramatic package of new laws since the Anti-terrorism Act of 2001.”
Among the provisions of the legislation are that it would expand the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)'s powers to “disrupt terrorism offenses and terrorist activity;” make it easier for law enforcement agencies to carry out preventive detentions, and allow them for longer time, make it easier to federal agencies to share information, and give law enforcement agencies power “to disrupt terrorism offenses and terrorist activity, according to a government fact sheet.
Defending the measures in Richmond Hill, Ontario on Friday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said, “Over the last few years a great evil has been descending over our world.”
“Canadians are targeted by these terrorists for no other reason than that we are Canadians,” he said. “They want to harm us because they hate our society and our values. They hate pluralism, they hate tolerance and the freedom we enjoy.”
Reutersreports that passage of the legislation “is assured because the Conservatives have a majority in Parliament.”
Reacting to its introduction, Micheal Vonn, Policy Director of the BC Civil Liberties Association, stated, “This radical expansion of national security powers is not sound security policy and presents a real danger to Canadians. Our national security agencies have shamefully inadequate oversight and are hostile to accountability. Canada has utterly failed to respond to the urgent need for national security oversight and instead, proposes an unprecedented expansion of powers that will harm innocent Canadians and not increase our public safety.”
“Our national security agencies have shamefully inadequate oversight and are hostile to accountability.” —Michael Vonn, BC Civil Liberties Association“This new law will impose a broad chill on legitimate political speech without enhancing public safety, and is likely unconstitutional,” Vonn added.
Privacy Commissioner of Canada Daniel Therrien expressed concerns with the legislation as well. He said in a statement issued Friday, “This Act would seemingly allow departments and agencies to share the personal information of all individuals, including ordinary Canadians who may not be suspected of terrorist activities, for the purpose of detecting and identifying new security threats. It is not clear that this would be a proportional measure that respects the privacy rights of Canadians.”
Echoing Vonn’s concerns regarding inadequate oversight, Therrien expressed unease “that the proposed changes to information sharing authorities are not accompanied by measures to fill gaps in the national security oversight regime. Three national security agencies in Canada are subject to dedicated independent oversight of all of their activities. However, most of the organizations that would receive and use more personal information under the legislation introduced today are not,” he stated.
Toronto-based journalist Steven Zhou made similar observations to Vonn, writing earlier this week at Ricochet, “A state apparatus that can pry into the lives of its atomized citizenry is indicative of totalitarian tendencies, threatening not just the quality of democratic practice, but, given the proliferation and importance of electronic communication, liberty itself,” he wrote.
“It's within this overall context that mass spying and policing powers will be expanded in Canada, in addition to many other countries, who have also, subsequent to incidents such as the Charlie Hebdo massacre, fallen prey to the politics of fear,” Zhou wrote.
Several European associations including PEN International, Open Rights Group and European Digital Rights addressed such expanding power in the wake of the Hebdo attack, issuing an open letter to world governments in which they wrote, “Moments like this need effective and considered responses and not unwise and restrictive increases in government and law enforcement powers.”
They added that “more surveillance is not necessarily better surveillance, and increasing the scope and scale of government spying or interfering with freedom of expression is not the answer to all our security or societal problems;” rather, they continue, “we must hold strong to the values of the society that we want to live in, or we risk undermining those values in the name of saving them.”
According to the Counter Terrorism Division of the FBI in Washington, a Somali-American has graduated from being a Washington DC cab driver to one of the most wanted man on FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists list – with a $50,000 bounty on his head.
Liban Haji Mohammed, 29-year-old Somali-born U.S. citizen, drove cabs in Washington DC for three years before being suspected by the FBI of having links with Al-Shabaab, a terrorist group linked with the deadly Westgate Mall attack in Kenya in 2013 – where the attack lasted four days with dozens killed; among several other terrorist attacks across Africa.
Mohammed is accused by the FBI of providing material support to Al-Shabaab, and left the United States in the summer of 2012 to join the terrorist group in Somalia.
"Not only did he choose to go to Somalia and fight with Al Shabaab, he took a prominent role in trying to recruit people to fight for Al Shabaab," said Carl Ghatas, special agent in charge of the counterterrorism division at the FBI's Washington field office.
Speaking fluent English, Somali, and Arabic, Mohammed is said to be 6 feet tall and weights a little below 200 pounds. The FBI warns that he may now go under multiple aliases and the public should watch out for him. Anyone with information that can lead to his arrest can submit it anonymously at tips.fbi.gov.
Being from Columbus, Ohio, I know a few things about Somalians. We have the second-highest population of these people in the country, second to Minneapolis. They are the most disgusting and worthless group of people on the planet, hands down. The only thing they do is live on welfare and commit crimes. They engage in no other behavior.
The importing of Somalians proves, hands down, that immigration has nothing to do with economies and blah blah blah, but is solely for the purpose of destroying our country.
The only possible way to survive the calculated killing machine of the Nazis was to walk backward out of the gas chamber.
The filthy rats are whining as only rats can whine – more of a screeching scream than a whine, really – claiming the BBC has dishonered them with a program about their idiot gas chamber hoax.
In other words, they asked “is 70 years enough?” Apparently, the Jew position is literally “never forget,” as in if human civilization last another hundred thousand years, we will still be reminded every single day that Jews got gassed by Hitler.
Arutz Sheva:
Joshua Eibelman, a junior at Maimonides School in Brookline, Massachusetts, told Arutz Sheva that he launched a petition calling for BBC Director-General Tony Hall to renounce the episode of the debate show “The Big Questions,” which suggested “laying to rest” the Nazi genocide of six million Jews and millions of others.
The petition, which can be signed here, argues that “on a day of mourning and remembrance of the 11 million innocent men, women, and children who were brutally murdered during the Holocaust, such a question is more than objectionable; it is reprehensible and morally repugnant.”
Hall is urged to “distance, renounce, and condemn this anti-Semitic rhetoric coming from inside the corporation he runs,” in the petition.
In particular, the call demands that Hall take disciplinary action against Nicky Campbell who hosts the show, “and clarify the standards by which all BBC personnel have to abide in doing so.”
Hahaha.
But what about Danny Cohen, the ratlike weasel who is the actual director of BBC television? Why is he not mentioned here?
This was a television program, Jews. Cohen is the one responsible.
Maybe he’s one of these Jews who sees that Holocaust talk has pasted the point of diminishing returns, and is in fact now just making people hate you more?
As the Jew-controlled leaders of Europe grow more open in their hostility towards indigenous Europeans, their words will stir more and more anger in the hearts of the Europeans who have been forced to accept the Jewish programs of multiculturalism and White genocide. We will remember these words when the day of awakening comes, and traitorous shabbos goyim like Reinfeldt will be tried and executed for their treason against the people of Europe.
At the end of last year, when it looked as though there was going to be a new election, Reinfeldt made some intensely bizarre statements about the nature of the Swedish nation.
Outgoing Moderate party leader Fredrik Reinfeldt broke the silence and made a statement before Christmas Eve, a new leftist political statement in light of the upcoming election. The former prime minister now claims that Sweden’s borders are fictional and that Sweden belongs to the immigrants who come here – not the Swedes.
The statements were made to address the new elections next year and Reinfeldt confirmed the position of Mattias Karlsson (SD) that elections are primarily a vote on immigration.
– There is a choice as to what kind of country Sweden will become, Reinfeldt to TV4 .
– Is this a land that is owned by those who have lived here for three or four generations, or is Sweden what people who come here as adults decide to make it? he asked rhetorically.
– For me it is obvious that it should be the latter, and that there is a stronger and better society if it is open to change, said Reinfeldt.
…
Then he said that the Swedes are uninteresting as an ethnic group and that it is instead the immigrants who should create the new Sweden.
The narrative that Whites are “uninteresting” is something that has pervaded the Jewish narrative for decades now. Ask yourself, White man: is civilization “uninteresting”? Is intelligence “uninteresting”? We here at the Daily Stormer don’t think so, and neither should you.
Leon Degrelle (born June 15th 1906, died March 31 1994) was a Walloon Belgian politician, who founded Rexism and later joined the Waffen SS which were front-line troops in the fight against the Soviet Union AND Communism.
This is a self-spoken biography (with an introduction by his daughter). He was one of many, who wished and believed that they could make a better Europe and struggled mightily to that end. Whatever one’s political outlook.., one cannot doubt the courage and conviction of Degrelle or the men that he led. That he survived so much carnage and the vengeance of his enemies at the end is remarkable. That he then went on to produce such a memorable account of his experiences we should be thankful for. It was an epic struggle by any standards…
When Degrelle joined the Wehrmacht he was offered the rank of lieutenant, but he refused and he went into Russian campaign as an ordinary private. He points out that Waffen-SS was really a front-line unit and a respected fighting force. Also, that 98% were NOT professional soldiers, or just young men after adventure, or NOT the goose-stepping “half-mad” stereotypes of Hollywood. Most of the volunteer units had a tragic end as they would rather fight to the last man instead of being handed over to their vengeful countrymen. The Waffen-SS had an estimate of 150-250 000 European (non-German) volunteers who fought with honor on the eastern front, and many of them winning the highest medal for bravery in the German armed forces, the Knights Cross.
This eye opening historical video is a daring break from the all the typical “anti-German” videos and publications as it tries to show the real untold truth about the Axis dealings with foreigners, volunteers, minorities, helpers and other diverse international relations. He does quite well at telling the untold, unpopular AND startling truths of the real perspectives AND relations of Germans AND non-Germans during WWII. Unlike Hollywood AND the general media that just LOVES to project an inaccurate historical “pseudo truth” !!
This speech examines AND relates the real unclouded facts tainted by the “fantasy history entertainment” that is so popular today… Some people actually really believe that going to the movies AND reading books by those who won the war, etc.., is a history course made easy, simple AND fun !!
Yes.., and very sad to say.., “the beat goes on” (and on, and on).., as WW III will NOT be that much different from the first two that killed millions.., or that far off in the future !!
As always.., after watching.., do your best to “pass it on”…
“Truth Does Not Fear Investigation”
“He who Wins the War.., also Writes the History”
“The Truth shall make you Free.., but at first.., it’ll make you Damn Mad” !!!
Apparently NBC is unaware that Black people do not read and certainly don’t use the internet, and has decided to launch a special news page for these people, NBCBLK.
The new Black news page, which has the goal of bringing back the greatness of the Negro Kings who Blacks allege both existed and built the pyramids, has a Twitter and a Facebook page.
I don’t really have anything to say about this. Daily Caller points out that the content of the site is shallow, but that isn’t something I would even bother to point out, given that it is so obvious that anything to do with Blacks is shallow.
Except the political commentary of Killer Mike. If they wanted an intellectual Black site, they should have tapped killer Mike.
No comments:
Post a Comment