Search This Blog

Friday, January 02, 2015

Daily Stormer

Daily Stormer


France: Moslems Burn 1,000 Cars, Media Says the French Did It

Posted: 02 Jan 2015 08:15 AM PST

Daily Stormer
January 2, 2015

Wait sir - who burned these cars?

Wait sir – who burned these cars?

A thousand cars is a lot of cars to burn up, but most of us aren’t even hearing that this happened as part of the New Year’s celebration in France.  If we are hearing it, we are getting the impression that “the French” did it.

In reality, French people – as annoying as they might be – are not particularly prone to Moslem-style violent riots, and these violent riots were entirely done by Moslems.

The biggest number of cars burned was in Seine-Saint-Denis, a suburb of Paris where 40% of the people under 18 are from Africa and at least a third of the total population is Moslem.

This has gotten so nuts.

Europe: Hey, is Paris on fire over there?

Jewish Media: Uh, what?  Why do you ask?

Europe: Yeah, cause I see a bunch of cars burning up over there.  What gives?

Jewish Media: Yes, goyim, you’re right, there do seem to be a bunch of burning cars in Paris – why are you burning up all of these cars in Paris, goyim?

Out with the Jews and we’ll have no excuse not to sent the apes along with them!

The Weird Descent of Rand Paul into Anti-White “Anti-Racism”

Posted: 02 Jan 2015 07:56 AM PST

Margaret H. Roberts
VDARE
January 2, 2015

What...?

What…?

So now it appears that House GOP Whip Steve Scalise did not after all speak to David Duke's EURO group, although the news is disseminating suspiciously slowly [Steve Scalise spoke to civic association meeting, not white nationalist conference, David Duke adviser Kenny Knight says, by Julia O'Donoghue, NOLA.com, December 31, 2014]. This presumably means that the Main Stream Media will be thwarted, for now, in its obvious intent to spread the smear to Senator Rand Paul via his father [If you're a politician and your chummy past with neo-Nazis resurfaces, don't worry. Ask Ron Paul, by Jeb Lund, The Guardian, December 30, 2015]. But there can be no doubt that, if Paul had been brought under more pressure, he would have groveled. Perhaps the most ominous trend on the American Right today is libertarians' adoption of prevailing "anti-racism" dogma, to the point where they can increasingly only be interpreted as overtly anti-White.

"Three out of four people in jail for drugs are people of color," Paul wrote late last year. "In the African American community, folks rightly ask why are our sons disproportionately incarcerated, killed, and maimed?" [Rand Paul: The Politicians Are to Blame in Ferguson, TIME.com, November 25, 2014]

Unfortunately for Paul, two assassinated NYPD officers were the predictable subsequent result of the ongoing Leftist agitation to which he was pandering. He had opened the door for his intra-party rivals to run against him on the traditional Republican issue of "law and order."

Yet even apart from Paul's tactical misstep, if he had merely reviewed crime statistics issued by Eric "my people" Holder's Justice Department—or even his father Ron Paul's old newsletters—he would have seen that black crime is committed at a shockingly disproportionate rate, triggering a massive response from police.

Paul is too intelligent not to understand this. But we're talking about the shameless politician who knowingly hired the erstwhile "Southern Avenger" Jack Hunter only to later accept his resignation. Paul patronizes the historic American nation that he is one of them until he is secure in office. But the record shows that once targeted by the MSM Megaphone, he buckles.

Instead of grassroots conservatives, Paul is aiming at a fickle but critical component of his support base—the Beltway based anti-statists whom VDARE.com calls Libertarianism, Inc. Libertarianism Inc., funded significantly by the Koch brothers, is comprised of the Left-libertarians who so annoyed Murray Rothbard because they put their social liberalism ahead of the goal of confronting the state. The defining element of left-libertarianism seems to be utter contempt for the historic American nation, especially those voters who make up the Republican base.

Needless to say, as Ann Coulter has pointed out, none of these people will stand by the libertarian position on employment discrimination—any more than Rand Paul himself. Instead, both Libertarianism Inc. and Paul are championing their opposition to the militarization of the police.

"I gave birth to a herp.  And soon, that little herp began to do a little derp." -Rand Paul on the development of his political philosophy

“I gave birth to a herp. And soon, that little herp began to do a little derp.” -Rand Paul on the development of his political philosophy

Rather than stopping the riots that were destroying private property and endangering productive citizens in Ferguson, the Libertarian Party went so far as to tell police to "stand down" and pretended the issue had something to do with drugs. [Libertarian Party: Police Should Stand Down in Ferguson, MO; End Failed Drug War, LP.org, August 14, 2014] Despite their pro forma condemnation of rioting, they're essentially defending Anarchy — telling police to "stand down" as race riots rage does nothing to help the civil liberties of black Americans and only encourages agitators.

Besides, why do libertarians even care about police militarization? Like selective immigration enforcement, the militarized police is a tool of a state that practices "anarcho-tyranny," using extreme force to terrify ordinary Americans while giving rioters a pass. None of that massive force that has been assembled is used, as it should have been, to ruthlessly coerce the "protesters." The militarized police presence is a sign of weakness, not strength, because there is no will in the Establishment to use it against black rioters.

The more menacing the State's facade, the weaker its execution. The more pointless a show of force, the more libertarians can comfortably complain about it. And no libertarian discussion of police militarization is complete without claiming the State is riddled with institutional racism.

"Sure, you and I were not there the night Michael Brown died," Students For Liberty writer Suzanne Schaefer begins in her analysis. "We cannot say with certainty what happened."

However, given even a basic understanding of police (mis)conduct in the United States, policemen's current and historical tendencies towards fist and trigger-happy brutality, and Darren Wilson's less than life-threatening state of physical well-being following his "attack," I feel pretty damn confident that it is reasonable to conclude that Brown's murder was unmerited.

[Reflecting on Ferguson, Students For Liberty Blog, November 25, 2014. Links in original]

In other words, because Schaefer read bad things about other police departments, she's trusting her prejudice to inform her conclusions about Ferguson.

Why is this outrage expressed on behalf of criminals who would never vote anything but straight Democrat? Because rather than wrestle the Megaphone from leftists and risk the "racist" label, libertarians cuddle up to the Left in hopes that one of the elites will slip a favorable word about them into the latest Narrative script.

While Libertarianism, Inc. recoils from institutions not yet conquered by the Left like the military, they openly telegraph to Leftists their willingness to cooperate, even if it means putting social liberalism ahead of fighting for free markets.

Thus Stephen Horwitz of Bleeding Heart Libertarians writes:

What is promising about this opportunity is that it gives libertarians a way to talk about race that does not fall into the trap that snares so many conservatives as well as too many libertarians: blaming the victim. One reason that progressives (including the media) think libertarians cannot talk seriously about race is that progressives assume, and they are correct disappointingly often, that libertarians think blacks are responsible for the problems in their own communities.

Horwitz instead says that libertarians can change the conversation to the "structural racism" created by government policies like local police forces getting military gear. But this specific policy is actually tied to statist policies that mandate more "Politically Correct and pro-criminal polices upon local law enforcement."

Other examples of "structural racism" cited by Horwitz: "occupational licensure and zoning laws," "government-run schools," and "minimum wage laws." [The Calling: Libertarians, Victim Blaming, and Structural Racism, by Steven Horwitz, Future of Freedom Foundation, August 28, 2014]. Thin stuff.

So what is the actual purpose of Libertarianism Inc.? To prevent the mostly white grassroots conservative base from actually taking action to defend their own interest against attacks by what is a de facto Minority Occupation Government. Every time conservatives begin to defend themselves, Libertarians rush in to tell them that what they want is Not Allowed. Beltway Libertarians function like Occupy Wall Street— "Radicals for the System."

But the amazing fact is that Rand Paul and Libertarianism Inc. stand a distinct chance of blundering into political power. On current form, the Establishment GOP and Conservatism, Inc. will collapse in much the same manner as the Soviet Union they once nominally opposed. More importantly, they will die without heirs. Recently, I was shocked to learn that a prominent, D.C.-based organization depended on donors whose average age was well over 75 years old. Libertarians will simply plunder what remains.

What happened to the old libertarianism, especially those anti-state libertarians who understood that immigration fueled the growth of the state? To quote exiled National Review editor Joe Sobran, it's "partly the mystery of a soul."

Libertarians used to be a self-selected group of quirky Jewish and European intellectuals who enjoyed goading the gatekeepers of Conventional Wisdom (See Prof. Walter Block's classic book, Defending the Undefendable) in between clobbering one another in speed chess matches.

But younger libertarians, brought up under the watchful eyes of Leftist institutions, can't imagine an alternative to the current system. Their educations, from kindergarten to college, emphasized white guilt and white privilege as a critical, core concept necessary to understand America's trajectory. These new recruits never express much interest in anything beyond racial hectoring—the famous warmth of Rothbard never emanates from their writings and speeches. They have internalized the Left's Narrative, and take its presuppositions for their own.

The ultimate irony is that these supposed rebels have turned a once-proud, brilliant, and dogged minority into part of the System's Volunteer Auxiliary Thought Police, ready to abuse the Historic American Nation like a cisgendered white male during freshmen orientation.

And if there's one thing most American voters are tired of, it's being lectured on race: Only nine percent of whites see race relations as a problem [As a Major U.S. Problem, Race Relations Sharply Rises, by Justin McCarthy, Gallup, December 19, 2014].

Yet it's at this moment that Libertarians have decided to ape the electoral strategy of the Democrats: mobilize the fringes of American life against the core. Unfortunately for this strategy, however, it's the core American population—the married, content, and patriotic—who are most likely to support the values of property ownership and limited government.

Rand Paul and his Left-Libertarians have turned their back on their natural supporters at the very time they most need a champion.

Black Panther Leader Says It’s Time to Build an Army to Kill Whitey

Posted: 02 Jan 2015 07:34 AM PST

Daily Stormer
January 2, 2015

Malik Zulu Shabazz is a for real nigga who claims to have once read a book, before he realized books were part of the White devil magic spell.

Malik Zulu Shabazz is a for real nigga who claims to have once read a book, before he realized books were part of the White devil magic spell.

On the official radio show of the New Black Panther Party, “Black Power Radio,” which is hosted on Blogtalk (which White people regularly get kicked off of for being racist), the former national chairman of the New Black Panther Party and current national president of Black Lawyers for Justice, Malik Zulu Shabazz, called for the Black race to begin forming an army to murder Whites.

He said:

And Mister Malcolm X, he consistently teaches us self defense. The most honorable Elijah Muhammad continuously teaches us self defense. The honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey teaches us self defense, and we know, our leader and our teacher the honorable Khalid Abdul Muhammad teaches us self defense. What am I saying? Right now it's time to build up that army. Right now it's time for us to build up those corps, those troops. It's time to get strong. It's time for lifting weights and working out and going to the gun range and all of that.

The difference between the New Black Panther Party and the old one is that the NBPP has no goals or objectives of forming a sovereign nation for Black Americans, and instead has the singular purpose of murdering Whites.

They aren’t actually organized really though, at all. So don’t be too concerned. Though they might start killing Whites randomly as they keep talking about doing, that would ultimately be a positive thing, a wake up call to all of these idiots who refuse to pay attention to what these monkeys are up to.

Kill the Germans: An Open Letter to the Marshfield, Wisconsin School Board

Posted: 02 Jan 2015 07:18 AM PST

Christine Miller
Radical Press
January 2, 2015

KILL-GERMANSHDR1000

Letter to the Marshfield School Board (December 10, 2014):

Several weeks ago while flipping through the TV channels I suddenly heard: Kill the Germans, kill the Germans, kill the Germans. It came from Wisconsin Public TV and was from a scene used as advertisement for the coming attraction "Escape from a Nazi death camp." Lately I have noticed that Wisconsin Public TV is having more and more anti German programs. These programs are funded by foundations, most of them with Jewish names. It is a truism: Whose money I take whose song I sing. All the channels, but especially Wisconsin Public TV are singing a Jewish song and You, the members of the Marshfield School Board are merrily humming along.

Last year three candidates were running for election to the School Board: Amber Leifheit, Mark Konrardy and Jason Angell. A forum was held at the Senior High School. My question to the candidates was: In the Marshfield elementary school libraries are innumerable Holocaust books. These books contain faked pictures (a Nazi cutting off the beard of a rabbi ) and faked captions. I enclose the picture of the dead concentration camp inmates of Nordhausen.

WAR & CONFLICT BOOK ERA:  WORLD WAR II/WAR IN THE WEST/THE HOLOCAUST

Nordhausen after Allied bombing.

This photo first appeared in Life magazine July 1945 and found its way into the book WWII which is in the elementary school libraries at Granton and Madison. Nordhausen was bombed by the USAF April 4, 1945. If you look closely at the photo you can make out the destroyed buildings in the background. The dead were not the victims of the Germans, but the Americans. My question was: Do you think it is appropriate for these books to stay in the elementary school libraries? Mr. Angell answer was: The books should stay. Ms. Leifheit seconded the answer. Mr. Konrardy equivocated.

Last year the school board eliminated the German language from it curriculum. The reason given was budgetary constraints, and since German had the lowest enrollment of the three languages being taught, Spanish, French and German, German had to go. If you put a sponge in the water and expect it not to get wet, you are stupid. If you expect kids to want to learn German with the continued anti German atrocity propaganda starting in our grade schools, then again, you are stupid.

1976 saw the first printing of Arthur Butz's The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.

The-HOAX-of-the-20th-C.600-copy

Read it.

Hollywood sprang into action with damage control and made the TV series: The Holocaust. Do I guess right saying that you never read Butz's book but were glued to the tube watching The Holocaust? Our youngest son was in third grade at that time. Every day for a week he came home crying, did not want to go to school anymore because he was mercilessly bullied. Kids knew he had a German born mother. Spare me therefore your anti bullying programs. They were not for my kids.

About a month ago I listen to Putin's speech (on the Internet) which Putin gave to the German parliament. He gave it in accent free, perfect German.  He stressed the close and beneficial cooperation between Russia and Germany through the centuries. He mentioned the fact that the first German unification (1871) was only possible with the good will of the czar. The second partial unification (1989) was the work of Gorby.

Remember back to 1962, or the beginning of l963. There were two space programs, the Vanguard, headed by an American Team and the Redstone program headed by Wernher von Braun. The Vanguard rockets fizzled. I still remember Kennedy appearing on TV accompanied by von Braun. Kennedy gave von Braun and his German team the go ahead.

1wernerjfk

Dr. Wernher von Braun and President John F. Kennedy.

After von Braun had died the Apollo program was headed by Arthur Rudolph, another of the German space scientists. The moon landing was successful. But now the Office of Special Investigation sprang into action. The OSI is a Jewish construct created to ferret out Nazis because Nazis are automatically considered "war criminals." The OSI gave Rudolph a choice: Leave this country, or face a war crime trial. Rudolph left for Germany. A few years later he wanted to visit his daughter and his grandchildren in California. He applied for a visa: the visa was denied. The Russians also had "recruited" their contingent of German space scientists.  After their job was done they were honored and dismissed with the good wishes of the Soviet government.

Right now horrible things are happening in Gaza. I can see the pale little faces of the dead Palestinian children.

1palestinian

Dead Palestinian child in Gaza murdered by Israeli Jew Military.

They look so peaceful that I cannot feel sorry for them. But the mangled little bodies of the children still alive sear my memory. Are you looking?

I don't think so. The cowards prefer to fight the real or perceived injustices of the past. Your memory is with the "Holocaust victims." You pretend to be patriots. But you patriotism is a farce, for you are nothing more than Judea's Willing Executioners.

Christine B. Miller

Marshfield, WI

millercbm@gmail.com

White Councillor Fights with Bare Hands Against Black Knife-Man

Posted: 01 Jan 2015 10:00 PM PST

Censor Bug Bear
January 2, 2014

10885126_1057822414244303_2428478644947348222_n

Democratic-Alliance town councillor Julia le Roux was stabbed while defending her home from an unknown Black intruder.

Survived: Dec 29 2014 – Dainty Democratic-Alliance town councillor Julia le Roux fights for the lives of her family against unknown black invader in her St. Saviour Street home: she terrified him so much when she tackled him with her bare hands and chased him through her home that he fled, leaving his tennis-shoes behind in his wake…Mrs Le Roux said she woke up early Monday morning from a sound and when she went into the living room she saw a man’s silhouette against the light from a street light.

‘It looked as if he was holding a knife. I attacked him instinctively. I dearly love my sister’s little sons who were sleeping in my house that night. I kicked and smacked the man and beat him with my fist. He ran to my bedroom. When I switched on the lights he ran to the kitchen. “I remembered my knives there and kicked closed the door between the dining room and kitchen, screaming to my mother-in-law Marlene to stay in her bedroom and for the boys to ran outside with me.” She called 10111 and the police arrived within a minute – and shortly thereafter followed by station commander brig. Lavona Januari.

Only then did she realise she had been stabbed. A doctor sewed up the 2cm blade-cut with a suture. The suspect broke into the house through the burglar bars in a front window. His tackies, one of Mrs Le Roux’s old handbags and a laptop computer were found discarded in flower bed outside the window. She denied that it was ‘a politically-motivated’ attack – even though the attacker was not arrested and thus could not be questioned for his motives. Another DA councillor Pierre Nel also was attacked about a year earlier. SAPS capt Louis Visser said nobody was arrested. (There must have been fingerprints all over the looted stuff outside?)

703A9C2E-30A8-4ABC-B58D-6582928E7FDC_cx0_cy7_cw0_mw1024_s_n_r1

South Africa, or is it Missouri?

News Source

White Pastor Forced to Shoot Non-White Employee in Self-Defense

Posted: 01 Jan 2015 09:52 PM PST

Daily Mail
January 2, 2014

24591ED400000578-0-image-m-18_1420041766011

Pastor Terry L. Howell was forced to shoot a non-White employee in a gunfight, after he told him he was being fired.

A Florida pastor shot and wounded an employee Tuesday morning in a gunfight after he told the man he was being fired.

Terry L. Howell, 61, was trying to fire Benjamin Parangan Jr., 47, Tuesday morning around 8am when the angered maintenance worker opened fire on the pastor, the Orlando Sentinel reports.

Parangan, who had worked for the Living Water Fellowship church in  Kissimmee for 9 years, is in stable condition at Osceola Regional Medical Center facing a charge of aggravated assault with intent to kill as well as other pending charges.

Witnesses told FOX that Howell was meeting with Parangan to fire him when Parangan pulled out a handgun and fired at the pastor several times and missed.

Untitled 1

Benjamin Parangan Jr will be charged with aggravated assault with intent to kill.

Howell reacted in self-defense, police say, when he pulled out his own pistol and fired back, wounding the man.

Both men have concealed-weapon permits, according to the Sheriff’s Office.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Read More

Former Racist Jack Hunter AKA the Southern Avenger Pushes Goofball Gibberish About Blacks and the Cops

Posted: 01 Jan 2015 09:44 PM PST

Kyle Rogers
CofCC
January 2, 2015

Jack Hunter once refused to be photographed without his wrestling mask, claiming that his right-wing views put his safety in jeopardy.

Jack Hunter once refused to be photographed without his wrestling mask, claiming that his right-wing views put his safety in jeopardy.

Jack Hunter was a minor radio personality in Charleston, SC from around 2000 to 2008. His main subject matter was the Confederate flag. He wore a Mexican style wrestling mask, and refused to give out his real name. He claimed that his right-wing views put him in danger.

Around 2009, Jack Hunter proudly declared that he stood by everything he wrote and said he was "even more radical now." Around the same time he went on the Political Cesspool Radio Show and proudly declared that the late Dr. Samuel Francis was his favorite author. Francis is the author of the CofCC Statement of Principals. He also boasted on the radio and his own website about being a former activist with the right-wing League of the South.

Then he started writing for the left-wing Charleston City Paper. The City Paper told him that he had to use his real name and a his real picture. No wrestling masks allowed. Suddenly Jack Hunter was a lukewarm moderate, denouncing conservatives for being too hard on Obama.

Jack Hunter got a job working for US Senator Rand Paul, but continued to rapidly drift to the left. Then one day he resigned from Paul's staff and publicly denounced himself as "a racist." Since then Jack Hunter has written establishment left-wing diatribes on racial issues.

What sort of political move is it to denounce yourself?

What sort of political move is it to denounce yourself?

The website for The American Conservative published a far-left racial diatribe by Jack Hunter today. Ironically the publication was founded as a "paleo-conservative" magazine by Patrick Buchanan and Taki Theodoracopulos. Both of those men have since abandoned the publication. It has continuously degenerated into an establishment "neo-conservative" publication. The very people that Buchanan and Theodoracopulos founded the magazine to combat.

Talking about Eric Garner and the Mike Brown, Jack Hunter fills his piece with all of the standard far-left falsehoods on race and police.

Hunter states "We know that black teenagers are 21 times more likely to be shot by the police than whites." This is completely fictional and without any merit. Statistically, police officers are more likely to shoot white crime suspects than black crime suspects.

In 2013, blacks made up 29% of all people shot by police. The same year, about 50% of all murders were committed by blacks. Blacks also commit over 50% of all robberies. Blacks account for many other serious crimes in percentages that exceed 29%. If blacks commit 50% of all murders, you'd expect that roughly 50% of the people shot by police would be black.

A black person is roughly 2.7 times more likely to be shot by police than a white person. However, they are far more likely to commit a serious crime than a white person. This means white suspects are more likely to be shot by police than black suspect. Most crimes are committed by young males. So the ratio of 2.7 is going to stay about the same if you are comparing young black males to young white males.

If anything, police treat blacks with kid gloves. Every white cop knows that every encounter with a black is a potential career ender! The source of the "21 times" figure originated with the far-left Slate.com. This is the same website that claims all white women who belly dance are "racists." Slate.com claimed the "21 times" was supported by FBI data, which it is not. Slate.com also lists ProPublica as the source, which is a false source. ProPublica never claimed anything even remotely close to this. The "21 times" figure was an absolute hoax, that is not supported by anything. Even other leftists have now conceded that the slate.com figure was a  hoax, but here is Jack Hunter still repeating it.

Now, many left-wing authors are a hyping a "7 times" figure. This is based on a small sub-set of the FBI data, which only includes urban areas and draws heavily from majority black areas. So even the "7 times" figure is a hoax, because it is not based on the full FBI data set. ProPublica, the media outlet that Slate.com falsely lists as a source for the "21 times" hoax, actually claims that 78% of all suspects killed by a black cop are black.  ProPublica also claims that black cops account for about 10% of all police shootings. Blacks make up 12.5% of the US public, but are less likely than white to become police officers.

Then Jack Hunter lays out another whopper. He says that blacks face harsher sentencing than whites. Once again. Totally false in every way.

Let's look at murder. Blacks committed 53% of all murders between 1976-2000. even now with the exploding population of Latinos, blacks are still holding steady at 50% of all murders. Yet, black murderers are significantly less likely to be prosecuted with first degree murder than white murderers. Because of this, they are significantly less likely to be sentenced to the death penalty.

Even the NAACP has conceded this! According to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, less than 41.6% of the people sentenced to death row since 1976 have been black. Far less than the percentage of murders committed by blacks. Yet it gets worse. Once placed on death row, black death row inmates are significantly less likely to actually be executed. Only 34.8% of the people who have actually been executed were black. When a black person commits murder, they are much less likely than white murderers to be sentenced to death. Once sentenced to death row, they are much less likely than condemned whites to actually be executed.

Now let's look at minor crimes. Majority black cities like New Orleans, Chicago,  and East St. Louis are famous for not even investigating or prosecuting multitudes of serious crimes. If you don't commit murder, you are unlikely to ever be prosecuted. In Chicago, very few people who shoot, but only wound their victim are ever prosecuted.

What parts of the country do people have the book thrown at them for minor offenses? Small towns and rural areas with low crime. Since white people commit crimes at rates dramatically lower than blacks, white people are more likely to live in low crime areas. Everyone knows that someone in a low crime small town is facing the most serious prosecution and sentencing for minor crimes.

Jack Hunter uses marijuana as an example. Once again, completely absurd. In many large cities cops are told not even to bother with marijuana. They simply confiscate it and throw it on the ground. Some cities issue civil citations. Once again, a white guy in a low crime small town faces dramatically stiffer penalties for marijuana than the typical black guy in a large city.

I was in court in Charleston, SC for not renewing my vehicle tag once. There was a black guy, already on Federal probation, who was there for a "drug paraphernalia" citation. The cop testified that he witnessed the man smoking crack cocaine under a bridge, but only gave him a civil citation for paraphernalia. You think many white guys in a small town, where the cops have nothing to do, are likely to get a free pass for crack? The fact that the man was on Federal probation likely meant he had already been given no jail time for a serious criminal conviction.

It is true that sometimes police arrest a guy for marijuana, because the person is a known gangbanger and police are fishing for something more serious. However, the police are not targeting these people based on skin color, but the person's reputation.

Jack Hunter cites the left-wing falsehood that blacks and white use drugs at the same rate. Every survey shatters this fake claim. When asked if you have done an illegal drug in the past year, young whites will typical answer "yes" at a rate almost as high as blacks. However, if you ask them if they have done an illegal drug in the past week, young blacks answer "yes" at an astronomical rate compared to whites.

For the record, I think marijuana should be treated like beer and cigarettes. However, it is simply false that blacks are unfairly targeted for marijuana arrests. If you want to see people persecuted for marijuana, go to an all white rural county in the Midwest. Compare the level of prosecution and sentencing to any major majority black city.

Consider that a black man on welfare will get a free lawyer at taxpayer expense. A white man who works for a living, can be falsely charged with a crime, and be financially ruined defending himself. A working man charged with a false crime has to pay for his own defense, while at the same time pay taxes to provide countless guilty people with free lawyers! Since blacks are on welfare at six times the white rate, guess which race is getting the short end of the stick when it comes to public defenders?

Many police departments are actually mandating that officers pull over or harass more white people out of a fear that they will be called racist. The departments want to be able to show on paper that their department has a proportional amount of encounters with whites as they do blacks.

The most famous example is New York City. The percentage of white people stopped by the NYPD exceeds the percentage of NYC crime committed by white people. Even Bloomberg, the former liberal mayor of New York City, conceded that this was true!

When police departments are ordered to place political correctness ahead of public safety,  white people, not blacks, are the ones being unfairly and systemically harassed! If blacks want the police to pay less attention to them, they should simply commit less crime.

Hunter likes to claim that he is a libertarian and wants to live in a society where the police don't bother innocent law abiding people. By defending violent criminals like Mike Brown, Jack Hunter is actually fueling a pro-police state, anti-libertarian backlash.

What can you say about someone who spent most of his adult life advocating racial realism, and now claims he was just kidding? Someone who went from attacking the NAACP to defending the violent criminal Mike Brown? He thinks he can get more fans and more fame by reciting far-left Cultural Marxism falsehoods than having convictions.

The left-wing does not take Jack Hunter seriously and treats him like a joke. The right-wing treats him like a joke. Actually Jack Hunter was already being attacking by major conservative radio personalities like Mark Levin and Alex Jones, before he even denounced himself as "a racist." He is now in a political limbo, where he has so discredited himself, no one will ever take him seriously again.

Presently Jack Hunter works for rare.us, a lukewarm, non-political, middle of the road internet news sites. In ten years, Jack Hunter will probably re-invent himself as something else again. There is no telling with this guy.

Sweden: Third Mosque Arson Attack in a Week

Posted: 01 Jan 2015 09:34 PM PST

Daily Stormer
January 2, 2015

The poor dears.

The poor dears.

It’s really beginning to look like some folks in Sweden are seriously opposed to the country becoming part of a Moslem caliphate, and are willing to take extreme measures to resist this happening.

AFP:

Swedish police launched a manhunt Thursday after the third arson attack against a mosque in a week, amid growing tensions over the rise of an anti-immigration far right movement.

“Someone threw a firebomb, a Molotov cocktail at the building,” Torsten Hemlin a spokesman for Uppsala police told Swedish news agency TT, adding that the mosque in eastern Sweden did not catch fire.

“They also wrote some vulgar racist words,” he said, adding that no one was in the building at the time.

Sweden’s Islamic Association posted a photograph online of the main door of the mosque which was emblazoned with an anti-Muslim slogan.

Police in Sweden’s fourth largest city Uppsala were alerted by passers-by who reportedly saw a man throw a burning object at the mosque at around 0430 GMT (12.30pm Singapore time).

“The crime has been classed as attempted arson, vandalism and incitement to hatred,” the police said in a statement appealing for eyewitnesses to come forward.

Thursday’s attack came just three days after a late night blaze at a mosque in Esloev in southern Sweden which police suspect was also arson.

On Christmas Day, a week ago, five people were injured when a petrol bomb was thrown through the window of a mosque in Eskilstuna, east of the capital Stockholm.

Again, we here at the Daily Stormer must always note that we do not support acts of violence against the invading populations. Truly, however, when one witnesses the fact that many do appear to be willing to engage in acts of war to defend their soil, we see how far this whole thing has gone, and how threatened the native peoples of Europe feel by these conquering armies.

KKK Successfully Puts Up Pro-White “Love Your People” Billboard in Arkansas

Posted: 01 Jan 2015 09:31 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 2, 2015

Deranged whackjobs, including the Mayor of the town in which it's located, have nonsensically claimed the billboard encouraging love is a sign of hatred.

Deranged whackjobs, including the Mayor of the town in which it’s located, have nonsensically claimed the billboard encouraging love is a sign of hatred.

The Knights Club of the Ku Klux Klan has successfully managed to get a pro-White billboard hung in Arkansas. The sign, placed along Highway 65 is an ad for “White Pride Radio” and reads “it’s not racist to heart your people.”

The people support the sign.

"I don't see it as being any kind of a racism sign," said Yolanda Riggins of Fayetteville to Ozarksfirst.com.

“It makes people stop and look. I mean you start wondering, what does the sign really mean?” said Dale Riggins, another Fayetteville resident.

Thomas Robb, diretor of the KKK chapter sponsoring the sign, said “The message is white people have the right to be proud of who they are. Everybody else has a right to be proud and I don’t deny that.”

Evil Harrison Mayor Jeff Crockett wants the KKK and other love-mongers to get the hell out of his hate-filled town.

Evil Harrison Mayor Jeff Crockett wants the KKK and other love-mongers to get the hell out of his hate-filled town.

But the mayor of Harrison, the town wherein the billboard is located, is a complete hater and says the sign of love is not welcome in his town.

"I would hope more people would stand up and say this isn't us. We're not all about this," said Mayor Jeff Crockett, who is from Chicago and achieved his position of Mayor of a Southern town through underhanded subterfuge.

The evil Chicago-native Mayor Crockett has prevoiously attacked other pro-White billboards

The evil Chicago-native Mayor Crockett has prevoiously attacked other pro-White billboards

Many people do not like the fact that an invasive outsider is forcing his gross alien value system on the townsfolk.

Many people do not like the fact that an invasive outsider is forcing his gross alien value system on the townsfolk.

This is the second pro-White billboard that the Mayor has attacked.

Calling a sign which calls for love a sign of hatred is ridiculous and clearly demonstrates just how driven by racial hatred the anti-White movement actually is.

I am hereby calling for the racist White-hating Mayor of Harrison, Arkansas, Jeff Crockett, to resign and move to Liberia, permanently, where he can forever engage in his sick and unnatural hatred for his own people.

James Edwards on the Scalise Scandal AKA the Congressional David Dukocaust

Posted: 01 Jan 2015 09:25 PM PST

James Edwards
Occidental Observer
January 2, 2015

It happened in 2002, but it's the biggest political news story in America this week. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) has now confirmed that he spoke to a conference organized by former Representative David Duke (R-LA).

The Washington Post:

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), the House majority whip, acknowledged Monday that he spoke at a gathering hosted by white-supremacist leaders while serving as a state representative in 2002, thrusting a racial controversy into House Republican ranks days before the party assumes control of both congressional chambers.

Scalise, 49, who ascended to the House GOP's third-ranking post this year, confirmed through an adviser that he once appeared at a convention of the European-American Unity and Rights Organization, or EURO. But the adviser said the congressman didn't know at the time about the group's affiliation with racists and neo-Nazi activists.

"For anyone to suggest that I was involved with a group like that is insulting and ludicrous," Scalise told the Times-Picayune on Monday night. The organization, founded by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, has been called a hate group by several civil rights organizations.

The news could complicate Republican efforts to project the sense of a fresh start for a resurgent, diversifying party as the new session of Congress opens next week. In the time since voters handed control of Congress to Republicans, top GOP leaders have been eagerly trumpeting their revamped image and management team on Capitol Hill.

Monday night, some Democrats were already raising questions about whether Scalise should remain in a leadership post.

"It's hard to believe, given David Duke's reputation in Louisiana, that somebody in politics in Louisiana wasn't aware of Duke's associations with the group and what they stand for," said Rep. Joaquin Castro (Tex.), a rising star in the Democratic Party who is considered among the most prominent Hispanics in Congress. "If that's the case and he agreed to join them for their event, then I think it's a real test for Speaker Boehner as to whether congressman Scalise should remain in Republican leadership," Castro said in a phone interview.

Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.) called the news "a big deal." "Race still is, sadly, an ugly aspect of our politics," he said by e-mail. "No politician should ever find himself/herself addressing a white supremacist organization except to tell them to go to hell." Associates of House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) are monitoring the situation, and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's staff had no comment.

Scalise's political circle worked furiously late Monday to quell the storm, with his confidants e-mailing reporters and House members, assuring them that Scalise did not know the implications of his actions in 2002 and describing him as a disorganized and ill-prepared young politician who didn't pay close attention to invitations.

When Scalise was asked by the Times-Picayune how he came to appear at the conference, he cited his staff, saying he had only one person working for him at the time. "When someone called and asked me to speak, I would go," he said. "If I knew today what they were about, I wouldn't go."

In a phone interview late Monday from his home in Mandeville, La., Duke recalled Scalise as a "nice guy" and said he was invited to the conference by two of Duke's longtime associates: Howie Farrell, who had worked on Duke's gubernatorial campaign, and Kenny Knight.

Scalise "says he didn't realize what the conference was. I don't know if he did or did not," Duke said. He also said Scalise should not be forced to resign, saying Scalise was merely taking an opportunity to meet with "constituents."

"What politician would ever pass up an opportunity to talk to his constituents?" Duke said. "It sounds like they are just playing politics."

Duke said he spoke to the conference twice, once by phone and later by video hookup. But he did not hear Scalise speak, he said, and does not know whether Scalise heard him speak.

In a statement, Scalise's spokeswoman, Moira Bagley Smith, emphasized that the then-state lawmaker was unaware at the time of the group's ideology and mission. "He has never been affiliated with the abhorrent group in question," Smith said. "The hate-fueled ignorance and intolerance that group projects is in stark contradiction to what Mr. Scalise believes and practices as a father, a husband, and a devoted Catholic."

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), a leading conservative in the House, said in an interview Monday that he stood by Scalise and believed that many conservatives in the House's hard-right bloc would do the same.

"Jesus dined with tax collectors and sinners," King said. "It's not the healthy who need a doctor, it's the sick. Given that piece of Scripture, and understanding that Scalise probably wasn't staffed thoroughly, I could understand how something like this happened. But I know his heart, I've painted houses with him post-Katrina, and I know he is a good man." …

Ronald Doggett, the head of the Virginia chapter of EURO, said Duke participated in the conference via phone from Russia.

Doggett, who attended the conference, said he did not remember hearing Scalise speak but said it would not be unusual for EURO to have contact with local officials.

"If that happened, so what?" Doggett said in a phone interview Monday. "What is the big deal? There's a different standard for whites than there are for other groups. How is this really news?" …

Scalise's defense — that he and his staff were not fully cognizant of the group's leanings and the nature of the meeting — contrasts with the local news media coverage generated by the Duke-coordinated conclave that spring. ("House Majority Whip Scalise confirms he spoke to white supremacists in 2002"; my emphasis)

The one thing this disgustingly biased story gets right is that it's almost impossible to believe that a Louisiana politician wouldn't have known the group to which he was speaking. David Duke is a household name, especially down there.

However, the "white supremacist" and "neo-Nazi" adjectives used to describe David Duke and EURO are completely over the top. (For a summary of Duke's political ideas, see "A Way Forward to Liberation for all Peoples: A New Paradigm For True Human Diversity and Freedom!").

I've spoken to EURO Conferences on three separate occasions and the people there have for the most part always been top shelf, taxpaying, God-fearing conservatives. Based upon what little I've read about Scalise it would appear as though he is a decent guy who shares similar heartfelt concerns. When he was a member of the Louisiana State House he twice voted against the MLK holiday and said in a 1999 interview that he shared many of Duke's conservative views.

David Duke and James Edwards

David Duke and James Edwards

With that being the case, it's disappointing to watch him and the "leadership" of the GOP scurry like cockroaches with the lights turned on. Other than issuing these silly apologies and denials, Scalise has done nothing for which he should be ashamed. Frankly, people should be much more concerned if he had spoken to an anti-American group like LaRaza or AIPAC.

Furthermore, unlike those who are so quick to disparage David Duke, I actually know the man. I have known him for ten years and he has never said or done anything in my presence that raises any red flags whatsoever. He has been a guest in my home on several occasions and been nothing but a complete and total gentleman to my family. He calls to check on them regularly. I say all that to show that there is a huge gap between the way he is presented and the real man as I know him

Having said that, David Duke will be our featured guest on The Political Cesspool Radio Program this Saturday, January 3, to set the record straight. We'll give him the opportunity to speak that the rest of the mainstream media denies him. If the only things you know about Duke are the nasty (and false) things you've read about him in the establishment press, then you owe it to yourself to hear the man share with you what he really thinks about human diversity and freedom for all people.

In case you've forgotten, Duke was once a member of the Lousiana State House of Representatives. He very nearly was elected to be a United States Senator in 1990, as the GOP nominee no less, and certainly would have won if he had simply betrayed his convictions and sold out like so many others have. He still managed to win over 600,000 votes. The very next year the Republican voters of Louisiana nominated him as the party's gubernatorial candidate.

No comments: