Everything related to Computer Security - Security Audits, Security Vulnerabilities, Intrusion Detection, Incident Handling, Forensics and Investigation, Information Security Policies, and a whole lot more.
Andrew Anglin returns to Radio Stormer to discuss with Sven Longshanks the cartoon killers and the dawn of a race war in France.
Topics covered include:
What is the difference between a moderate Moslem and an extremist one.
The parallels between the Blacks in America and the Moslems in Europe.
How anti-Moslem feeling will always lead to anti-Jew feeling.
The distinct lack of brown faces at the 'solidarity with Moslems' demonstrations.
Why you will not see any Moslems claiming 'we are all Charlie.'
The reason why a retarded Trayvon meme was chosen to express how people are feeling.
How it seems like every week now the Moslems are hijacking or executing White people, yet the laughable lamestream media will claim that torching a thousand cars on New Year's Eve was just a quaint French custom and had nothing to do with the sand monkeys.
The response from various politicians to the latest outrage is discussed, as well predictions made for a huge rise in nationalist sentiment for 2015.
Many other subjects are touched upon in the first Radio Stormer podcast of the New Year and regular episodes will be returning soon.
There’s never a shortage of victims of policy planned by Jews and crypto-Jews.
Jews have constantly perpetuated their narrative of the so-called Holocaust for decades now, yet they aren’t planning on recognizing the validity of the Armenian Genocide, which occurred during the First World War in the Ottoman Empire.
Though it occurred in the Ottoman Empire, it is believed by some to have been devised by Jews and crypto-Jews. Mevlan Zadeh Rifat, a Turkish writer who published Inner Folds of the Ottoman Revolution in 1929, supports this idea:
Armenian genocide was decided in August 1910 and October 1911, by a Young Turk committee composed entirely of displaced Balkan Jews in the format of a syncretist Jewish-Muslim sect which included Talaat, Enver, Behaeddin Shakir, Jemal, and Nizam posting as Muslims. It met in the Rothschild-funded Grand Orient loge/hotel of Salonika.
Israel does not plan to recognize the Armenian genocide perpetrated by Turkey, Rafael Harpaz, Israel’s ambassador to Azerbaijan, told Azeri website Trend.
"Israel is a democratic country, everybody has two opinions, not one opinion," Harpaz said. "The government has a very clear opinion."
Why would Israel refuse to recognize the Armenian Genocide if it actually hadn’t been planned by Jews and crypto-Jews? I personally can’t think of a legitimate reason.
Dudes are apparently dead. As I’m sure you’re all already aware. It happened over an hour ago – I was recording a show with Sven. Probably should have been watching our feeds while recording, but since it wasn’t live it wouldn’t have been much use.
We sure do need some live radio.
90,000 sure is a lot of cops, huh?
Some of the hostages are dead too. Hope it was only Jews.
French police have stormed two hostage sites in Paris and north of the city, with the hostage takers reported dead.
Explosions were heard at a warehouse in Dammartin-en-Goele, where two suspects in the Charlie Hebdo magazine shootings had been holding one hostage.
Explosions and gunfire could also be heard at a supermarket in eastern Paris, at Porte de Vincennes, where several hostages were held.
Reports suggest a gunman there was linked to the Charlie Hebdo suspects.
After the operation started, several hostages could be seen leaving the supermarket.
Police told French media that four hostages in the supermarket had been killed prior to security forces storming the site.
Two police officers were injured in the operation at the Hypercacher supermarket, AP reported.
The hostage at the warehouse in Dammartin has been freed, while a police officer at the scene was injured, AFP news agency said.
(This is a sloppily updated article – going to figure out a better system for this before the next crisis – information before they were shot is below.)
Moslems, Jews: Bad News.
France is still in the midst of a serious mess.
An armed man has taken a hostage in a Paris Jew grocery, AFP reports. Apparently, he is suspected to be the same guy who shot the female police officer yesterday.
As the manhunt continued for two brothers suspected of carrying out the massacre at the office of French satire magazine Charlie Hebdo, several municipalities near Paris had their websites taken over with the image of an ISIS flag.
…
Among the towns affected by the cyber-attack were Piscop, Val D'Oise, Ezanville, Jouy-le-Moutier and Goussainville — all on the outskirts of Paris. At least two of the sites were taken offline completely after they were hacked.
According to the posting, the sites were hacked by "L'Apocca-Dz." A link on the pages connected to a Facebook page.
UPDATE:
More info on the hostage situation in the Jew market and the Charlie suspects – who also have a hostage.
It’s not clear which hostage situation these guys are dealing with.
A gunman has seized hostages at a kosher supermarket in Paris as police in northern France have cornered the two Charlie Hebdo massacre suspects.
Armed police flooded the Porte de Vincennes area of eastern Paris after the man reportedly opened fire and took up to five people prisoner.
He is said to be the gunman who killed a policewoman in the city on Thursday.
In Dammartin-en-Goele, 35km (22 miles) north-east of Paris, the Charlie Hebdo suspects are also holding a hostage.
The Islamist militants are inside a small printing business and have reportedly said they are prepared to die.
…
Images of heavily armed Swat teams mobilising in Paris were broadcast live.
Reports suggest the hostage-taker is connected in some way to the Charlie Hebdo attackers.
The Charlie Hebdo attackers, said to be two brothers linked by intelligence officials to militant groups, shouted Islamist slogans during the shooting and then fled Paris in a hijacked car, heading north.
Shots were fired during a high-speed car chase earlier on Friday.
It appears that on Friday the suspects hijacked another car in the town of Montagny-Sainte-Felicite before travelling on to Dammartin.
The car’s owner is said to have recognised them as brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi, the key suspects.
In a televised statement, Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve confirmed the men being sought on Friday were those wanted for the Charlie Hebdo attack and said they would be “neutralised”.
It definitely appears a war has started.
We’ll see.
One thing is clear: we will remember this day for the rest of our lives.
The drug-crazed Daniel Patel was also found guilty of two arson charges involving setting light to parked cars in Harrow.
A vile sex beast who staked out his target behind bins before charging at the 17-year-old and sexually assaulting her has been jailed for five years.
Daniel Patel, 26, from Harrow, pleaded guilty to one count of sexual assault at Harrow Crown Court in October and was sentenced yesterday.
The girl was walking alone along Hunter Grove in Harrow, north-west London in June when she noticed a naked man standing behind bins, reports Get West London.
She crossed the road to avoid him and continued on walking but he ran up behind her and pulled her to the ground.
Patel was given five years in jail at Harrow Crown Court.
It remains unknown whether the mystery-meat female, being linked by the press to the Black, is the ape’s concubine, read sex slave, or is in this for her own purposes.
The name and image of the suspect that took control of a large Jew market in Eastern Paris has now been released, and as if it couldn’t get any easier for our message to ring true, the culprit involved was a Moslem Negro with an especially feral look in its eyes.
Hayat Boumeddiene, a second person of interest to authorities, and an identified co-conspirator to the terrorists, seems to be either the descendant of recent Moslem converts, or some sort of bizarre half-breed mongrel lashing out due to lack of a suitable racial identity.
The monkey, according to those on the ground, was repeatedly demanding that his fellow hostage-takers, miles away in a similar encounter inside a print shop, be allowed to escape unimpeded, out of the country.
Note that elite special forces have launched near-simultaneous operations on both sites, with loud explosions and automatic gunfire being heard. As of right now, both brothers involved in the Charlie Hebdo shootings are reported to have been killed during the assault on their location, while the fate of the Black seems to be the same.
City Hall of Dammatin confirms to ABC NEWS that Charlie Hebdo suspects dead and hostage is safe.
Sustained gunfire and small explosions erupted at both ongoing hostage situations in France as police continued tense standoffs at both locations.
There were at least four explosions and a barrage of gunfire at the kosher market in Paris and then police were seen going in. People then were seen coming out of the market, and ambulances and firetrucks drove towards the market, loaded people in and drove away.
Two simultaneous hostage-takings in France today are linked, with suspected gunmen in each situation connected through an earlier attempt to break a convicted terrorist out of jail, Paris’ public prosecutor told ABC News.
Amedi Coulibaly, 32, a suspect in a Thursday fatal shooting of a police officer in Paris’ Monrouge area, is believed to be involved with a hostage standoff at a kosher grocery, police said. Coulibaly was convicted for his involvement in an attempt to help a convicted terrorist escape custody, while Cherif Kouachi — a suspected gunman in Wednesday’s massacre at a French satirical newspaper office — was released.
The man they were accused of trying to free from prison was Smain Ali Belkacem, one of those behind the 1995 attack on the Paris transport system that killed eight people and wounded 120, according to the Paris public prosecutor.
Officials have identified Kouachi and his brother Said Kouachi as suspects in the attack that killed 12 people. The suspected gunmen are holed up in a printing company in a town northeast of Paris, taking one male employee hostage, said Audrey Taupenas, a spokeswoman for Dammartin-en-Goele City Hall.
Just as a footnote to this piece, while we shouldn’t shed a single tear for these generally annoying parasites taken hostage, and at least a few killed, by the African, this allows us to demonstrate the complete inability of all primitive non-Whites to adjust to Western society.
Now the Blacks can be mentioned in the same sentence as the subhuman Sand Bandits without fear of diluting the impact of our ideas, or of being called out for picking on the simple simians.
Any discussion on the exact opinion of the average White Frenchman on the street is highly encouraged.
Explosions rock the Jew kosher market as elite police advance on the entrance.
A shadow of char is the only remnant of an improvised bomb that exploded Tuesday outside the local offices of the N.A.A.C.P. here at the feet of the snow-covered Rocky Mountains, jolting the volunteers more accustomed to running membership drives and planning prayer breakfasts.
On Thursday, F.B.I. investigators continued trying to unravel the identity and motivation of whoever had set off the makeshift bomb Tuesday morning, a crime that authorities are investigating as a possible bias attack or case of domestic terrorism. The N.A.A.C.P.'s all-volunteer staff here decided to reopen the office, still baffled by an assault that they said seemed to come out of nowhere.
"It really saddens me," said Henry D. Allen Jr., the president of the group's Colorado Springs chapter. "I do look at the '50s and '60s when there were bombings, there were lynchings," he said. And now, he added, "when those who say that civil rights is no longer an issue, we're going back to that destructive mentality. I tell them, the fight is still on."
The group has long been active in local civil-rights issues related to policing and education, and it held candlelit vigils for Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, both of them African-American teenagers who were shot dead by white men. But for the most part, members said, their perch here in a one-story red building sharing space with a hair salon seemed a world away from the protests over racially charged police killings that have shaken American cities in recent months.
"It's just astounding to see that somebody would go through all that trouble to hurt somebody who gives turkeys at Thanksgiving," said Carol Chippey-Rhanes, a volunteer.
The building is tucked into a residential neighborhood on the south side of town, two blocks away from a school that offered its space as a meeting place after the explosion. The chapter has been in the same building for about 30 years, its presence announced by a simple light-blue sign above the front door.
Here are some non provocative images published by AP during the Trayvon Martin case.
And here's a non-provocative image of the late Michael Brown:
The lesson–the AP knows that inflammatory images will have consequences in terms of enraged Muslims all over the world, but are unable to figure out that this applies to American blacks in their own back yard.
Alternatively, the lesson is the AP doesn't care, because the rioters don't target the media, but burn out immigrant storekeepers, and attack white police and citizens. For example, the late Zemir Begic, beaten to death with hammers by St. Louis blacks. Did the MSM publish as many pictures of him and his wife–now his widow–as they did of Trayvon Martin looking adorable, or were they afraid of being provocative?
Are these people paid actors involved in some hoax? Or do Moslems actually want Sharia law in France?
I was mildly shocked to see the sheer numbers of people coming out and claiming that Moslems would never shoot up a news paper and thus the cartoon-killers must have been secret agents.
I don’t exactly understand this mindset where everything is a staged hoax, but from where I am sitting, this aggressive defense of Moslems looks very bizarre. I view myself as impartial, and when I see three small terrorist attacks in France in a week, then see Moslems set a thousand cars on fire for New Years in France, then see another bigger terrorist attack a week later, attacking a group which did indeed insult their Prophet (something which they historically do constantly), it pretty much makes logical sense that it happened as we saw in the videos.
Is the position of the conspiracy theorists that Moslems do not commit crimes or terrorist attacks at all, or just that they never commit big ones?
Why do Moslems commit both big and small terrorist attacks in their own countries, but when those same Moslems come to a country which they presumably have more aggression towards than their own country, they stop doing this?
Why do the people promoting these hoaxes tend to engage in such open falsification of data, such as claiming that the concrete particles seen after the cop was shot were “smoke from a blank”*? If this is real, why is there a need to be purposefully dishonest?
Why would Jews do this, given that it works directly against everything they are trying to achieve in Europe and gives credence to the positions of nationalists?
If Jews did for some reason do this, wouldn’t it be better if we went along with the official story, as it is so beneficial to our cause, whereas claiming Jews did it simply makes us look insane while giving comfort to the Moslems which are invading and conquering Europe?
Why did they attack a paper which promotes a Jewish agenda and actually kill a Jew?
*There appears to be some confusion among the theorists as to whether this was an entirely fake event and no one died – hence the need to fake the shooting of a cop – and the theory that people did die but that the masked men were secretly Jews. Obviously, if no one died, you would have to believe that all of these people had been working at the newspaper – some of them for decades – were actors. Or, I suppose, that they were somehow bought off and paid to fake their own deaths. The surviving witnesses would also, obviously, have to be in on it, as would the families of the officers who died – or had their deaths faked, according to the theory.
I am just not seeing how this fits into any agenda of Jews. Unless you would argue that Jews just do crazy things for no reason other than to cause chaos. Which is sort of true, I suppose, but there are so many other ways they could have come at doing that. For instance, one would think they would rather make Whitey look bad than these Moslems – if they are willing and capable of staging massive hoaxes, why not blame nationalists, and turn people away from nationalism, rather than towards it?
The dead Jew
The idea of using this to promote wars in the Middle East doesn’t make any sense either, as the wars are ongoing already. Along with this, the situation with ISIS taking over Iraq after a decade of Western intervention has completely turned people off the idea of intervention, and so the Jews have moved into the realm of funding proxy armies to fight each other, supported by bombings. There is no real drive to invade these countries any more, and Jews are not even demanding that.
We understand it is a delicate balance the Jew is trying to promote, where Moslems in the Middle East need to be bombed and Moslems in Western country are gentle lambs who need free everything, but which situation does this attack effect? It seems to me it is the idea of allowing Moslems in our countries which is being questioned now, with the entire Jew propaganda apparatus going into overdrive pushing the idea that “no, no – they aren’t really like this.”
I could be wrong here – I obviously have no inside information. Maybe there is just something that I’m not seeing. But I have looked at all of the available information, and presently see no real justification for these theories, and see it as a clear case of attempting to excuse the behavior of Moslems.
Obviously, whatever the case, the Jews are responsible for the attack, because if it wasn’t for the Jews, these people wouldn’t be in France in the first place. And that is a sensible and logical angle to come at this, in my opinion, and blame the Jews in a way that makes plain sense – we say “we shouldn’t expect these Moslems to behave in a civilized manner, and instead of blaming them for their natural patterns of behavior, we need to look at who brought them into our countries.
Anyway, those are my thoughts. Give us yours.
Final Note:
I realize that me taking a position on this offends some people, and I hope that we can agree to disagree and continue to engage in the fight side-by-side. If I didn’t think it mattered, I wouldn’t bring it up at all, but in order to preserve my own integrity I must state my position here. I know there are some who will simply dismiss this, and that’s fine. But because other websites do nothing to challenge the hoax position, I feel it is a duty to offer a counter, as I do feel it is extremely destructive to the cause.
I will ask that those who believe this is a hoax (as well as those who don’t) try to be civil in the comments section. I have no problem with your free speech, and you can say your piece, but very often those who believe in hoaxes (and sometimes those who don’t) are condescending, rude and aggressive. Please try to avoid that. Trust me, it does not make you seem more rational to insult people who don’t agree with you. And we should always strive to be mature adults in our discourse.
From the Washington Post, a reprint of that 2013 blog post by Eliot Borenstein that I quoted a half-week ago in my post about Masha Gessen. Borenstein is less crazed than Gessen, but then he didn't get to be the Obama Administration's chief of Russian-language propaganda, either, so he probably ought to work on upping
How the jury perceives his race may well change his sentence.
By Eliot Borenstein January 8 at 2:47 PM
Eliot Borenstein is Professor of Russian and Slavic Studies at NYU and editor of the All the Russias blog at the Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia.
What do Americans see when they look at Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? And do Russians see the same thing?
This week, the court is selecting a jury for Tsarnaev's trial on charges stemming from the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. As any viewer of "Law and Order"knows, Tsarnaev is to be tried by a "jury of his peers." But, as Masha Gessen points out in a recent New Yorker post, "very few of the twelve hundred prospective jurors resemble Tsarnaev."
This question of "resemblance" could have real-world consequences. In a recent study, Northwestern University professor Nour Kteily found that participants were significantly more likely to demand harsher penalties for the Tsarnaevs if they believed the brothers were "not white." …
The bombers' racial identity has been a thorny issue for some time now. …
As Peter Beinart asked in The Daily Beast, "Are the Tsarnaevs White?" Beinart does a fine job reminding us that whiteness has long been a historically constructed and contested category in America, one that cannot be reduced merely to skin tone.
The history of immigration and assimilation in the United States is the history of the evolution of whiteness. As recently as 1988, I remember a limo driver in southern New Jersey explaining to me that Princeton was so ritzy "you had to be white or Italian to live there." The Italians, Irish and Jews eventually overcame enough stigma to be considered white, but they were not "white" from the beginning.
Who can forget that famous scene in Gone with the Wind in which Scarlett is revealed to have an Irish last name, O'Hara, and is therefore immediate sold into slavery?
Born Vivian Mary Hartley[2] in the campus of St. Paul's School, Darjeeling in the then Bengal Presidency of British India, she was the only child of Ernest Hartley, an English officer in the Indian Cavalry, and his wife, Gertrude Mary Frances (née Yackjee; 1888–1972),[3][4] a devout Roman Catholic, who may have been of Irish and Parsi Indian ancestry.[5]
Merle Oberon was another black-haired Anglo-Indian leading lady of the 1930s.
Back to Borenstein in the Washington Post:
The color line is still decisive: Visible shades of brown or gold are an insurmountable impediment.
Beinart's conclusion is that the obstacle to the Tsarnaevs' whiteness is Islam, which in contemporary America has the effect of adding invisible layers of brown to otherwise pale skin. This makes sense as far as it goes, but it leaves out a crucial component for understanding the Tsarnaevs' position on the color wheel: their racial identity before their arrival in the United States. Back in the Russian Federation, were the Tsarnaevs "white"? If they weren't, what were they?
Bilingual speakers of Russian and English all recognize the disconnect between the terms "Caucasian" (i.e., "white") and "Caucasian" (person from the Caucasus region of the former Soviet Union); for Russian speakers, the two terms are functionally opposite. What, then, are "people of Caucasian nationality" (as the Russian bureaucratic phrase would have it)? Can their difference be mapped onto a grid of whiteness and non-whiteness?
Part of the problem in mediating between American and Russian understandings of difference is that Americans are accustomed to seeing race as the default category for otherness. The American preoccupation with race as a primal category makes complete sense, given that the country is haunted by not one, but two racial original sins (native American genocide and the enslavement and mass murder of Africans and their descendants). The power of American racial discourse threatens to suck the life out of other analytic categories; in the public sphere, the only way we can even broach issues of social class is to conceive of them as issues of race.
Indeed.
Russia is another matter entirety. Social class is not a taboo topic, and the notion of "race" has played itself out quite differently. … Whiteness is invoked conversationally as a function of status and comfort, with a casualness that would cause their American interlocutors to, well, blanch. Georgia State University professor Jennifer Patico provides an example of a common Russian expression when she tells of a woman who is proud of her improved housing accommodations: "We are now living like white people." Here whiteness points to the speaker (who is, of course, white) in an unselfconscious fashion that would be impossible in the United States: whiteness without guilt.
Uh-oh.
Remember: white guilt is worrying that your ancestors were too ethnocentric, while Jewish guilt (see, for example, Roth's Portnoy's Complaint) is worrying that you aren't ethnocentric enough for your ancestors.
… This does not mean that no one in Russia is "black." … And it is applied not according to skin color, but to hair color: In Russia, the "blacks" are the people from the Caucasus. That is, the "Caucasians," and anyone who might look like them.
When I'm in Moscow, I expect to be stopped by police and asked for my documents on a fairly regular basis. With the protection of my magical American passport, I usually treat it as something of a sport, baiting younger, Chechen-hunting police officers who have lost the Soviet-era knack for spotting a Jew.
… Just as Soviet Jews, who were not Russian by definition, became "Russians" in America, it is only by coming to the United States that the Tsarnaevs became fully white. And in the process, reminded us once again of just how tenuous the category actually is.
The threat of a terror attack in the UK is increasing and the security services cannot be expected to stop every plot, the head of MI5 has warned.
Speaking after the attack on the French magazine Charlie Hebdo, Andrew Parker said police and MI5 had “stopped three UK terrorist plots” in recent months.
He said the number of Britons who have travelled to Syria was now around 600.
It comes as security has been increased on the France/UK border following the Paris attack, which left 12 dead.
UK border staff had “intensified checks on passengers, on vehicles and goods coming from France” following the killings in France, Home Secretary Theresa May announced.
The move was a “precautionary” measure and was not as a result of any specific intelligence, she added.
However, Mr Parker, who was named director general of MI5 in March 2013, warned the UK was facing “more complex and ambitious plots” by extremists.
The shootings in Paris were “a terrible reminder of the intentions of those who wish us harm,” he said.
It comes after a number of anti-terrorism operations in the UK in recent months, including three foiled plots in the last three months.
“Deaths would certainly have resulted otherwise,” Mr Parker added.
“But we cannot be complacent. Although we and our partners try our utmost we know that we cannot hope to stop everything.”
Speaking at MI5’s headquarters, Mr Parker said the security services knew a group of al-Qaeda extremists in Syria planned “mass casualty attacks against the West”.
But he said the number of “crude but potentially deadly plots” MI5 was facing had also increased.
Moslems just kill people randomly how am I supposed to predict that #NOCRYSTALBALL LOL you’re just going to have to hope you don’t get murdered #YOLO
You know how you could stop all terrorist attacks?
By not allowing a single Moslem in a White Western nation.
So by not allowing that as an option, we are literally saying “diversity is more important than innocent lives.” There is no other way to interpret what is going on.
Why are Moslems in our countries in the first place? No one has even attempted to explain this on logical lines. How many people have to die before we are allowed to ask just what exactly all of these people are doing in our countries?
This is the Twilight Zone.
“We brought these people here to enrich your culture with kebab and live on welfare, but now we can’t stop them from randomly murdering you or murdering you because you drew a cartoon they didn’t like. Sorry. But please, don’t hate these people just for coming to your country and killing your people – that would be evil.”
Who is looking at this like “oh yeah, cool, makes sense”?
No comments:
Post a Comment