Search This Blog

Friday, March 06, 2015

Daily Stormer

Daily Stormer


/r/europe Warns Users That the Nazis are Coming

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 11:11 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

Beware ye Redditers.  Soon we will fall to the Swastika.

Beware ye Redditers. Soon we will fall to the Swastika.

Following Michael Slay’s post yesterday about spreading awareness of the Jewish menace on Reddit, /r/europe issued a warning to their followers to be on the look-out for Nazis.

(Regrettably, they gave an archive link, so few of the likely tens of thousands seeing the warning have come through here).

You might find some of the comments there interesting.  I did. It’s a good barometer of where a lot of people are at these days, and understanding that will better help you propagandize them.

California: Proposed “Sodomite Suppression Act” Calls for Mass Executions of Homosexualists

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 10:50 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

The future of homosexual rights, as envisioned by some anti-gay activists.

The future of homosexual rights, as envisioned by some anti-gay activists.

It is good to be reminded that the Daily Stormer is really moderate by traditional standards.

For example, we are nowhere near as hardcore as this guy.

laist:

If a lawyer from (where else but) Orange County gets his way, we could soon be voting on a measure that will allow us to put “bullets to the head” of any gay person in California in an effort to wipe our state of the Homosexual Agenda.

As seen in a filing received by the state’s attorney general’s office at the end of February (complete with $200 check), attorney Matt McLaughlin of Huntington Beach wants to put the “Sodomite Suppression Act” (.pdf link) on the ballot and into the hands of the voters. “Suppression” sure seems like a kind name for a law that calls for gays to “be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.” Allies and supporters of gays would also subject to any combination of a fine of $1 million, put in jail for 10 years, and banned from the Golden State for life. Harsh. Furthermore, gays and gay allies are banned from holding public office or “enjoy any public benefit.”

In order to gay-proof his law, section (e) of the statute says that the law cannot be overturned by any court except the Supreme Court of California, and only if the all of the judges are not “sodomites” or some other kind of deviant.

Though this is obviously much too extreme of a solution to the problem of faggotry, it is not surprising that people feel this way.  Sodomy is being so violently rammed down our throats that people are bound to overreact.

Sodomy should be illegal, and you should be arrested for flaunting it in people’s faces.  The death penalty should remain on the table, but probably, you should be treated psychologically for a mental disorder.  There is a lot of evidence that a good percentage of homosexuals can be reformed through treatment. If it is shown you cannot be reformed, you should remain indefinitely in an institution or a prison camp.

If you can keep it secret, then you should have nothing to worry about.  Homosexuality has technically always existed, and never in European history were they ever hunted down if they didn’t make their weird private sex behavior known.  The real problem is that the Jews have created a culture where faggotry is celebrated and encouraged, and this is leading to widespread social decay.

Here is the entire text of Mr. McLaughlin’s law:

SODOMITE SUPPRESSION ACT

Penal Code section 39

a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.

b) Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God’s just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating-wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.

c) No person shall distribute, perform, or transmit sodomistic propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the age of majority. Sodomistic propaganda is defined as anything aimed at creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other than between a man and a woman. Every offender shall be fined $1 million per occurrence, and/or imprisoned up to 10 years, and/or expelled from the boundaries of the state of California for up to life.

d) No person shall serve in any public office, nor serve in public employment, nor enjoy any public benefit, who is a sodomite or who espouses sodomistic propaganda or who belongs to any group that does.

e) This law is effective immediately and shall not be rendered ineffective nor invalidated by any court, state or federal, until heard by a quorum of the Supreme Court of California consisting only of judges who are neither sodomites nor subject to disqualification hereunder.

f) The state has an affirmative duty to defend and enforce this law as written, and every member of the public has standing to seek its enforcement and obtain reimbursement for all costs and attorney’s fees in so doing, and further, should the state persist in inaction over 1 year after due notice, the general public is empowered and deputized to execute all the provisions hereunder extra-judicially, immune from any charge and indemnified by the state against any and all liability.

g) This law shall be known as ” The Sodomite Suppression Act” and be numbered as section 39 in Title 3 of the Penal Code, pertaining to offences against the sovereignty of the state. The text shall be prominently posted in every public school classroom. All laws in conflict with this law are to that extent invalid.

America No Longer a Majority White Christian Nation

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 09:42 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

Why didn't you listen?

Why didn’t you listen?

The demographic decline is leading to a decline in personal identity.  And vise versa, I’d argue.

Less people than ever now identify as both “White” and “Christian” in the United States.

RNS:

"The U.S. religious landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation that is fundamentally reshaping American politics and culture," said Dan Cox, research director for Public Religion Research Institute.

Last week, PRRI released the American Values Atlas, an interactive online tool that compiles data about Americans' opinions, identities, and values. One of the biggest takeaways of this years' study was that, for the first time ever, America is not a majority Protestant nation.

Part of this shift is due to the growing number of religiously unaffiliated Americans, now at 22 percent nationally and 34 percent of young people.

The study also revealed that in 19 states, white Christians are now a minority. The list of states where this is the case includes a few surprises. Several Bible Belt states such as Georgia (No. 16) made the list; Texas (No. 7) had the same population of white Christians as New York (No. 5).

While one might want to blame these shifts on "secularism," one force at work seems to be America's increasing ethnic diversity. According to PRRI, Hispanic Catholics are a growing proportion of Catholics and evangelical Protestants are becoming less white.

Here are the 19 states which have collapsed (Hawaii didn’t actually collapse, it was always just a colony that became a state):

1. Hawaii – 20 percent

2. California – 25 percent

3. New Mexico – 33 percent

4. Nevada – 36 percent

5. New York – 37 percent

6. Alaska – 37 percent

7. Texas – 37 percent

8. Maryland – 38 percent

9. Arizona – 38 percent

10. Washington – 42 percent

11. Florida – 42 percent

12. Oregon – 43 percent

13. New Jersey – 43 percent

14. Colorado – 44 percent

15. Illinois – 46 percent

16. Georgia – 46 percent

17. Vermont – 47 percent

18. Delaware – 48 percent

19. Louisiana – 49 percent

This included Whites who identify as any form of Christian, including Mormon.

The collapse of Christianity among Whites is the biggest thing which has led to the invasion.

To clarify: that is to say the collapse of our identity has led to the invasion, with Christianity being, traditionally, the biggest part of our identity.

To clarify further: aspects of pre-Christian Europeanism served as a basis for the Christian faith, and thus they were carried through history by the Christian faith.  Beliefs about the supernatural or even the spiritual are secondary aspects of Christianity.  The core of it is a system through which to define and maintain collective identity and social normalcy.

He tried to warn us.

He tried to warn us.

I personally identify as Christian because I identify as European.  There is nothing about the traditional system of Christianity which I can take issue with.  It reinforced morality, individual and collective identity and the image of man and contained in it the definitions of a cultural and social structure.

Modern Christianity is of course something very different, being a cult of personal happiness and belief in weird forms of voodoo.  This has led to both a fleeing of the faith (identity) by young people, as well as a total loss of utility to those who still remain a part of what has become the mainstream of Christianity.

I do not attend church, nor do I consider myself classically religious.  I simply believe in both God and in my Ancestors, and so have no reason to try and fix what isn’t broken as far as religion goes.

If we had maintained traditional Christian values, we would not be in the situation we are in right now.

Report Shows the Majority of Immigration into the UK Between 1997 and 2010 was a the Result of a Jew Conspiracy

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 07:42 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

"Kick out the WOGs?" Sorry, goyim - I thought you said "we want kebabs!"

“Kick out the WOGs?” Sorry, goyim – I thought you said “we want kebabs!”

Between 1997 and 2010, Labour policies were responsible for at least two-thirds of the 3.6 million immigrants who moved to Britain in that period.

Yes, 3.6 million immigrants did move to Britain over a period of 13 years.  This is a nearly six percent increase in the British population.  This is probably close to the percentage of immigrants America brought in over the same time period (6% would be 21 million), but we don’t know because our government won’t tell us.

This chart on American immigration, provided by the Migration Policy Institute, is obivously lying.

This chart on American immigration, provided by the Migration Policy Institute, is obviously lying.

And unlike in America, where there is a capitalist drive to drop the value of labor, in Britain almost all of these immigrants – and least the non-EU ones – are welfare leeches, literally brought into the UK for no other reason than to bleed the people and destroy the culture and social cohesion.

The British numbers are the highest per capita in Europe, save for Sweden, who has replaced about ten percent of its population with immigrants in the same time period.  Also, Greece may be worse, but those numbers are not available.

RT:

Labour policies were responsible for two thirds of the extra 3.6 million immigrants that moved to the UK between 1997 and 2010, a study has revealed.

A damning report by the think tank Migration Watch slated Labour's policies, calling them a "sticking plaster," which failed to address the root causes of the issue.

They say that after 1998, Labour introduced a "deliberate policy of loosening immigration controls in almost every sector – a policy that was not declared in any of the three election manifestos."

According to the report, "These policies accounted for two thirds of the 3.6 million net foreign migration under Labour," the report adds, a figure which "is four times higher than during the previous 13 years and is equivalent to the population of Britain's five largest cities outside London – Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow, Sheffield and Bradford."

The report also pointed out that the total doesn't include illegal immigrants.

They add that in 2003, then-Home Secretary David Blunkett asserted there was "no obvious limit" to the number of migrants that could come into the country.

The think tank said the failure to impose transitional controls on citizens of the European Union 'A8' Eastern European states had "led to one of the largest peacetime movements of people in Europe."

Lord Green of Deddington, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: "This is a fascinating but very sad story of how a small but determined group appear to have manipulated immigration policy while deterring any opponents with false allegations of racism.

"There is nothing to suggest that Labour now have the political will to get the scale of immigration down to a sensible level, rather the reverse.

"Whatever the Labour leadership may be saying now, the pressures from pro-immigration groups in and around any future Labour government would very likely lead to the gates being thrown open once more."

Immigration has become a sore-point for all the major parties, with the UK Independence Party (UKIP) capitalizing on pressure to bring numbers down.

The latest figures show that in spite of Cameron's "no ifs no buts" pledge to cap net migration at 100,000, it is still on the rise, with a net figure of nearly 300,000 moving to the UK in the past 12 months.

"This may prove damaging to the Conservatives as they have over promised and/or underperformed. Labour are, however, unable to capitalize on the Conservative failure as their legacy on the issue is as close to toxic as is possible," the report reads.

Labour leader Ed Miliband has previously said there could be "no doubting" how seriously his party took the issue, after a leaked memo warned campaigners to "move the conversation away" from immigration.

So basically, it was a gigantic Jew conspiracy by Labour Jews.

Interesting.

Silly goyim!  Don't do a glass half empty!  Think of the kebab!

Silly goyim! Don’t do a glass half empty! Think of the kebab!

Dumb Black Ben Carson Apologizes to the Faggots for Light-Weight Comment Against Them

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 07:17 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

"Nigga ah bees duh muffuggen dakta, beetch." -Ben Carson's campaign slogan

“Nigga ah bees duh muffuggen dakta, beetch.” -Ben Carson’s campaign slogan

The sickening Black bastard and alleged Republican Presidential “Hopeful” Ben Carson has issued an apology to faggots for statements he made in an interview.  He had indicated gayness was a choice, citing prison faggotry as an example of this.

Here’s the clip.

Following these statements, which I don’t even really agree with, he was attacked by gays and bent to their will, posting on Facebook that he doesn’t really know and was basically just making crap up when he said it is a choice.

“I realized that my choice on language does not reflect fully my heart on gay issues,” Carson wrote in a He wrote. “I do not pretend to know how every individual came to their sexual orientation. I regret that my words to express that concept were hurtful and divisive. For that I apologize unreservedly to all that were offended.”

So you believed in what you said until people got mad. Sounds like an upstanding character you’ve got there, Coltrane. You seem almost as honest and genuine as our current Black President.

Gayness as a Choice

Just to make a small comment on Carson’s original comment – I don’t think gayness is really a “choice” anymore than being schizophrenic is a choice. Claims that it is a choice really just make anti-gay people look stupid. This statement became popular on the Christian right because they had capitulated to the Jewish assertion that no one could be judged on anything that was outside of their personal control. If you agree that you can’t judge a person for being Black, than how could you judge someone for being gay?

There may be some situations in which acting on homosexual drives, rather than suppressing them, is a choice. But the idea that you would choose to think it is hot to have sex with another man’s butthole – no one could choose that.

Carson cited the example of prison homosexuality to back up his theories, but what he didn’t say is that it is only Blacks who become gay when they go to prison, and they don’t do this because they choose to do it, they do it because their sex urges are completely uncontrollable.

Besides being stupid, the “gay is a choice” argument also makes you look like you have no plan on how to fix this gay problem. You solution is to tell people to stop doing it? That’s nonsensical and not a solution at all. Our solution is to lock these people in treatment facilities to deal with their mental health problems. Which makes obvious, logical sense, and is also significantly more compassionate.

LOLWUT: ISIS Attacks Major Iraqi Archaeological Site

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 06:54 AM PST

Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

A partial reconstruction of a gate at Nimrud

A partial reconstruction of a gate at Nimrud

A different picture of the same thing.

A different picture of the same thing.

ISIS gets dumber! They have continued their war against historical artifacts by attacking the ancient archaeological site of Nimrud in North Iraq, smashing up the place with bulldozers. Because Allah Akber.

No one knows how bad the damage is, but Wikipedia is prepared for the worst.

Yeah.  That sucks.

Yeah. That sucks.

Looking at this situation, we see that Islam is much like communism in that it seeks to erase history of people in order to create a global system of homogeneity.

An artist's rendition of what the biblical city of Nimrud would have looked like in its day.

An artist’s rendition of what the biblical city of Nimrud would have looked like in its day.

Granted, these were Whites and not Arabs who built these great monuments they are destroying, but at the same time, they were still the ancestors of these Arabs. The reason they don’t have civilizations like this any more is that their blood is mixed.

New York Times:

It was the latest in a series of attacks on ancient structures and artifacts in Syria and Iraq that the group has destroyed in the name of its harsh interpretation of Islamic law. Last week, Islamic State militants videotaped themselves destroying statues and artifacts in the Mosul Museum and at the Nergal Gate entryway to ancient Nineveh. The militants captured the city during its offensive blitz through much of Iraq last June. "The terrorist gangs of ISIS are continuing to defy the will of the world and the feelings of humanity after they committed a new crime that belongs to its idiotic series," the ministry said in a statement on its Facebook page, referring to the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh.

Nimrud is the sprawling site of a city founded by the Assyrian King Shalamansar I, who died in 1245 B.C. Among the most impressive objects at Nimrud are the colossal statues known as "lamassu," mythological creatures that depict either lions or winged bulls with bearded human heads. Pairs of the 17-ton statues are at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the British Museum.

Many of the massive Nimrud statues remain buried at the site. But the ISIS video from the Mosul Museum clearly shows at least one statue from Nimrud being defaced. And the site has many areas that archaeologists have not yet explored.

George C. Papagiannis, the Unesco world heritage officer in charge in Iraq from 2009 to 2011, said the loss of any artifacts from Nimrud was a dark blow to historical preservation. "These extremists are trying to destroy the entire cultural heritage of the region in an attempt to wipe the slate clean and rewrite history in their own brutal image," he said.

Wacky behavior this is!

At least the best stuff had already been looted and is in the British museum.

Islamic justice AKA burn this bitch down.

Islamic justice AKA burn this bitch down.

The question remains: what the hell are these ISIS guys up to?

Why do they act so erratically and ridiculous? Is it a completely Jew-run organization? Are they just stupid Arabs?

Whatever the case, one thing is certain: these people are as goofy as they are bloodthirsty.

EU Responds to Sharply Rising Anti-Immigrant Sentiment with Decisive Plan to Help Them Get Here Faster

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 04:54 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

Pure hatred for the color of the skin is the only conceivable reason Europeans would be opposed to unlimited numbers of these people entering their countries.

Pure hatred for the color of the skin is the only conceivable reason Europeans would be opposed to unlimited numbers of these people entering their countries.

Under severe pressure now to change their insane policies on immigration, the EU has finally responded with a decisive plan to flood the place even more rapidly.

The Guardian:

The European commission is planning to establish immigrant-processing centres outside the EU for the first time, in a radical policy departure aimed at stemming the movement of hundreds of thousands of people across the Mediterranean.

Struggling to draft coherent immigration strategies at a time when the issue has become one of the most toxic in the politics of many EU countries, the European commission announced it was fast-tracking a policy paper on migration.

Dimitris Avramopoulos, the commissioner in charge of home affairs including migration policy, said Brussels wanted to use EU offices and embassies in third "countries of origin" to process applications for asylum and refugee status before the migrants reach Europe. The aim would be to reduce the numbers of migrants illegally landing on EU shores.

The new policy is strongly supported by Italy, which is on the front line of what has become one of the world's most perilous migration routes, the Mediterranean. Of the 270,000 migrants who arrived illegally in the EU last year – 1.5 times more than the previous year – 220,000 came via the Maghreb and across the Mediterranean, according to Frontex, the EU's external borders agency.

This is insane. Just to be clear about what this means – they are going to establish the immigrant centers so that the trip to Europe becomes easier for the immigrants. They will be able to apply in their own countries, and then European taxpayers will pay for them to fly into European countries and live on welfare and commit crimes.

Why do you hate the color of the skin?  Because you are pure evil.

Why do you hate the color of the skin? Because you are pure evil.

Italy supports it only because it will mean a more even distribution of immigrants across the EU. I don’t blame them for this, but it must be understood in context. This makes things slightly better for Italy (and Greece and Spain), while making things significantly worse for the rest of the EU states.

But don’t you worry your stupid little goyim heads. This isn’t actually even a crisis.

"We do not consider the caseload of arrivals to the EU as a huge or overwhelming number because the EU can, if managed properly, handle this," said Anna Eva Radicetti, a policy expert at the International Organisation for Migration's European office. "We should not view this as a crisis in terms of numbers of migrants arriving to Europe, and Europe should not respond with a crisis mode."

Great. What a relief. I had been under the impression that this was indeed a crisis. Thanks for clearing that up.

So anyway, where do you plan to put these immigration processing centers?

The idea of introducing migrant-processing offices in key transit countries such as Niger, Egypt, Turkey or Lebanon is gaining traction in the EU. France is also a strong supporter of such a scheme, while the German interior minister, Thomas de Maizière, is said to be pushing for EU facilities in countries such as Egypt. Small EU member states disproportionately affected by the flow of migrants, such as Malta, are keen on the idea.

Great choices! Those are some of the most fantastically diverse countries I can think of. And how fantastic it is going to be when these poor unfortunates who are exactly the same as us except for the color of their skin have an easier time getting into our countries

You horrible, hate-filled goyim.  Where did you discover this hatred for the color of skin?  You were born this way, of course.  Race does not exist but somehow all Whites are born with hatred of the color of skin.

You horrible, hate-filled goyim. Where did you discover this hatred for the color of skin? You were born this way, of course. Race does not exist but somehow all Whites are born with hatred of the color of skin.

The biggest problem is that racist goyim don’t want this program because they are filled with irrational hatred for colors of the skin.

The commission has previously resisted pressure on the issue from national governments in the EU. Avramopoulos's statement represents a U-turn. While there is growing support in certain EU capitals, there is also very strong opposition in other countries to a proposal that would entail shouldering the refugee burden more equitably across Europe. Migration experts say that, of the 28 members of the EU, 18 have small immigrant communities and few are keen to see that change.

So, to recap:

-Every place in Europe that has immigrants is complaining they have too many, demanding the EU do something to stop the flow of immigrants

-There is an unquestioned assumption by the Jew-run EU that the immigrant flow must not ever slow down

-The EU comes up with a plan to help more immigrants get here faster, but says they will spread them out across the EU more

-Nations who are being flooded are happy for what seems to be a slight relief

-Nations which do not have a lot of immigrants are upset because they do not want more immigrants

So:

Basically, what they have done is used complaints about immigration to call for more immigration.

This is part of a push for a mainstreaming of the EU’s immigration policy, wherein all nations, including Denmark, would be forced to accept insane numbers of savages from everywhere.

For the system to work and to decide where successful applicants are going, there would need to be a new, agreed system of burden-sharing or a "distribution key" for taking in migrants in the 28 member states. Experts being consulted on the commission proposals say there is discreet discussion of a distribution key, but there is high scepticism about whether agreement will be reached.

The EU would also need to strike bilateral agreements with the governments of countries hosting the new application centres. These countries could become magnets for regional migrant flows with the refugees reluctant to return to their native countries after having an EU application rejected.

They are now forced to come out and admit that the plan is a complete genocide of the European people through endless amounts of immigration.

Ultimately, this is a good thing. Because it is pushing the people further towards deconstructing the EU completely, once and for all.

Eric Holder Admits Outright That “Hands Up – Don’t Shoot” was a Lie

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 03:46 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

Put your hands down and burn those t-shirts.

Put your hands down and burn those t-shirts.

Eric Holder has admitted outright that the Negro whining slogan of “hands up – don’t shoot” – used by millions of protesters not only across the US but across the planet – was a lie.  Michael Brown did not have his hands up, that the story was completely faked by his government and the media.

What have your people gained from this, Eric?  They have simply been made to look like stupid animals by the Jews for their own Jew purposes.

What have your people gained from this, Eric? Nothing at all. They have simply been made to look like stupid animals by the Jews for their own Jew purposes.

Apparently, no one is calling for his arrest for inciting riots, nor is anyone calling for any of these media outlets to be investigated for spreading false information for the express purpose of inciting chaos.

Daily Caller:

He acknowledge the faked story as he released the Justice Department's investigation of the August 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, in Ferguson, Mo.

"I recognize that the findings in our report may leave some to wonder how the department's findings can differ so sharply from some of the initial, widely reported accounts of what transpired," Holder said at the press conference.

However, Holder declined to criticize the TV-media frenzy — and the claims by local African-American protesters — that spread the false claim that the dead youth, Michael Brown, had his hands up shortly before his was shot by police officer Darren Wilson.

Instead, Holder suggested the media and Americans recognize the fakery. "It remains not only valid – but essential – to question how such a strong alternative version of events was able to take hold so swiftly, and be accepted so readily," he said.

I’ll tell you, Eric – it took hold so swiftly because it was financed by Jew Soros, and it was accepted because the Jew media accepted it. Your people aren’t even really to blame here. They were exploited to be used as a battering-ram against White America by the Jews.

Dis nigga be feelin dem hans up: the incredible part is, the mind of the Negro will not be able to process that this was a hoax, as they don't distinguish between reality and their feelings.  So we're gonna keep hearing about it.

Dis nigga be feelin dem hans up: the incredible part is, the mind of the Negro will not be able to process that this was a hoax, as they don’t distinguish between reality and their feelings. So we’re gonna keep hearing about it.

From the report: "there are several individuals who have stated that Brown held his hands up in an unambiguous sign of surrender prior to Wilson shooting him dead [but] their accounts do not support a prosecution of Wilson."

"As detailed throughout this report, some of those accounts are inaccurate because they are inconsistent with the physical and forensic evidence; some of those accounts are materially inconsistent with that witness's own prior statements with no explanation, credible for otherwise, as to why those accounts changed over time. Certain other witnesses who originally stated Brown had his hands up in surrender recanted their original accounts, admitting that they did not witness the shooting or parts of it, despite what they initially reported either to federal or local law enforcement or to the media. Prosecutors did not rely on those accounts when making a prosecutive decision," the report concluded.

This is completely insane, people.  This is an admission not simply that the slogan was a hoax, but the entire ongoing Ferguson fiasco was a hoax.  Even after admitting Darren Wilson did nothing wrong, the Negro Occupation and their Jew media allies kept indicating that some element of truth must have existed.  But now, they are flatly admitting that the entire thing was manufactured, and was exactly what we here at the Daily Stormer said it was all along – a clear-cut situation of a violent Black criminal robbing a store, getting stopped by police, going for the cops gun and getting shot – something that happens on a regular basis in America.

Eric Holder did not even frame this as an apology, even though he himself was one of the most key figures in purposefully spreading this hoax.  Instead he blamed the media.

All of these people need to apologize, and some of them need to be criminally prosecuted.

This is hell we’ve lived through for almost a year in this country.  Someone needs to be held responsible.

This is probably the biggest hoax since the holocaust.

School children in St. Louis

School children in St. Louis

White people marching down the streets of London

White people marching down the streets of London

Also London.  Seriously, there were multiple huge Michael Brown protests in London.  Nothing for Rotherham though.

Also London. Seriously, there were multiple huge Michael Brown protests in London. Nothing for Rotherham though.  Because an obviously made-up story about one Black American is more important than thousands of little British girls whose stories were actually real.

Rep. Al Green

Rep. Al Green

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries

Rep. Yvette Clark

Rep. Yvette Clark

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee

CNN Hosts

CNN Hosts

Lying witness and Jew lawyer

Lying witness and Jew lawyer

The Rams

The Rams

The Redskins

The Redskins

Dave Chappelle and that faggot football player whose name I forget

Dave Chappelle and that faggot football player whose name I forget

Usher

Usher

Al Sharpton

Al Sharpton

A dance at the grammies

A dance at the grammies

Puff Daddy and some other rappers I don't recognize

Puff Daddy and some other rappers I don’t recognize

Oh, Eric...

Oh, Eric…

Farrakhan Calling for Violent Race War, Apparently

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 03:03 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

Louis Farrakhan, top race war advocate.

Louis Farrakhan, top race war advocate.  This is believed to be the first time he wore a real tie.

Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam cult, has apparently called for a violent race war in America.

Farrakhan posted a Tweet – linking to a video on Facebook – wherein he said “I’m calling on all Black soldiers in the U.S. Armed Forces to come home, unite & fight for our own lives.”

Maybe there are multiple ways to read this, but I can't figure any.

Maybe there are multiple ways to read this, but I can’t figure any.

Imagine if a White man was telling soldiers to come home from the war and fight for their race.

"We believe that local government, state government and federal government should always be on the side of truth and justice where the citizenry is concerned, no matter what the color," Farrakhan says in the video, before going on to talk about Michael Brown – the video was recorded before the US government admitted that Brown’s death being anything other than self-defense on the part of officer Wilson was a hoax invented by them and the media.  He also mentioned other recent Black martyrs, whose martyrdom will soon be shown to be a hoax as well.

"And government, instead of standing up when the state fails, or when the city fails — we expect the government to intercede," Farrakhan said. "We want an immediate end to police brutality and mob attacks. Don't you want that too?" he asked the vicious crowd.

He then moved into apparent calls for violence.

"If the government cannot protect our lives … why are you in the Armed Forces, fighting for a democracy that you don't have at home?" he said. "Why are you in the Armed Forces of America going overseas to fight somebody that never did a thing to you and act pitiful when your own people are shot down in front of you?"

He continued, "I'm calling on all the soldiers that fight for America, come home and let's unite and fight for our lives that the federal government refuses to fight for us. Then we must fight for ourselves."

Farrakhan used to be liked by White Nationalist types because he seemed to blame the Jews instead of Whites, and also seemed to want separation rather than to advance Black parasitism in the way Sharpton and Jackson encourage.  These positions came into question when he supported Barack Obama as President; following this, he progressively began to lose the plot.

Greece: Syriza Seeks to Increase Immigrant Pressure on the Greek People

Posted: 06 Mar 2015 02:55 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 6, 2015

Goyim, the suffering.  These people should be allowed to roam the streets freely at your expense.

Goyim, the suffering. These people should be allowed to roam the streets freely at your expense.

After completely screwing over the country by making an EU bailout deal which is worse than the one Samaras set up, Syriza is moving on to screw over Greece on the immigration front.

Let’s take a look at a Moslem praising him for fighting for the freedom of invasion.

Al-Jazeera:

Until now, the Greek government’s response to all migrants without documentation has been dictated by deterrence and detention policies. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), 45,500 migrants and asylum seekers were apprehended by Greek police in 2014.

But the left-wing Syriza party’s resounding victory in Greece’s parliamentary elections last month could signal a major shift in policy.

The party’s 40-year-old leader, Alexis Tsipras, is not likely to be a traditional Greek prime minister.

Debt is not the only area in which the new Greek government and the EU are colliding. Syriza also proposes a major overhaul to Greece’s migration policy, which could affect how the EU deals with asylum seekers.

Syriza’s emphasis on protecting migrants who have entered the country, instead of detaining and deporting them, stands in stark contrast to the priorities in Brussels.

Good God!  This is how delusional these Moslems are – Brussels is anti-immigration!  This would be like saying Obama is anti-immigration, though probably slightly more ridiculous!

Continuing.

Recent statements by Tasia Christodoulopoulou, Greece’s new immigration minister, signal a 180-degree turn from the focus on detention and border patrols, which has dominated the country’s migration policy for more than a decade.

In addition to a plan that would grant citizenship to second-generation migrants born and raised in Greece, the new immigration ministry has also proposed shutting down immigrant detention centres.

These are the boldest statements to date from Athens on the issue of migration.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Christodoulopoulou said detention must only be used as “an exceptional measure”, and promised immediate changes.

She has called for expediting the process following the suicide of a migrant detained at the Amygdaleza facility in western Athens on February 14.

“Our first priority is the immediate release of unaccompanied minors and their safe removal,” she said.

“Abolishing the 18-month detention period and rescission of asylum seekers’ detention are urgent measures for us.”

Greek law currently limits the detention of migrants who have entered the country illegally to 18 months, and states that after their detention, if they do not apply for asylum, they should be repatriated to their countries of origin.

But, because of the lack of bilateral agreements with the countries of origin of so many migrants, safe repatriation is often not possible.

Most do not agree to voluntarily return and do not want to apply for asylum in Greece, because of the long process and the unlikelihood of being granted refuge – Greece has the lowest acceptance rate of asylum requests in the EU.

This is wacky, wacky stuff!  I have spent a lot of time in Athens, and it is nearly impossible to find a person who isn’t spending at least 70% of their day complaining about immigrants!  And Syriza wants to lighten up on them, and release more of them from the camps!

This is yet more good news for the Golden Dawn.  Syriza is right on track to become the most hated government in the history of Greece!