Search This Blog

Sunday, February 08, 2015

Daily Stormer

Daily Stormer


Fourth Position Radio: American Vivisection

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 05:08 PM PST

Wolf Wall Street
Fourth Position
February 8, 2015

scimmia

“Operation Skyhook” is accelerating! UJG joined the discussion on the rapid invasion of America being promulgated by JOG.

Download

Black Monster Arrested for Brutally Murdering White Woman in Front of Her Children

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 03:40 AM PST

WTNH
February 8, 2015

EP-150209921 (3)

And guess how the subhuman monster knew Jaclyn Wirth in the first place.

Police arrested a man Wednesday for brutally murdering a woman right in front of her children in a 2011 Norwich cold case.

On December 14, 2011, Jaclyn Wirth was killed at her home at 6D East Baltic Street. After an extensive investigation, and help from the New London County Cold Case Unit, police arrested 33-year-old Lashawn R. Cecil. The Norwich man is charged with felony murder, criminal possession of a firearm, and criminal attempt burglary. He's being held on a $2,000,000 bond.

As Cecil was walked out of the Norwich Police Department, escorted by the officers and detectives who arrested him, we asked if he had anything to say.

"Not guilty," said Cecil.

Police say Cecil man shot the 26-year-old right through her apartment door. Officer Scott DuPointe was the first to arrive at the scene.

hc-norwich-cold-case-solved-0205-20150204-002

Lashawn R. Cecil was already in custody for was already in custody for a 2012 shooting, has been charged with murder, felony murder, criminal possession of a firearm and criminal attempt to commit first-degree burglary.

"You can't prepare for an incident like this," said DuPointe. "I mean, the lady was wounded. I mean, I was the last person to speak to her before she had passed away. So it's something that's going to stick with me for the rest of my life."

Wirth's seven-year-old son Sergio called 911 that night. He is now 10 and his younger brother, Kymani, is now five. Their mom's aunt, Peggy Lufkin, is raising them. She says they are resilient.

"They can rest in peace a little bit more tonight and not worry that someone is coming after them," said Lufkin through tears.

This case became personal for all officers and investigators, who are still working this cold case.

Terrorist Lunatic Malcolm Harris Demands Free Speech be Violently Shut Down in America

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 03:24 AM PST

In Which a New Operation Begins

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 7, 2015

Malcolm Harris: This is the insane faggot threatening us with violence in Al-Jazeera

Malcolm Harris: This is the insane faggot threatening us with violence in Al-Jazeera

As I have been warning for a while now, the Jew-run liberal left is in the process of ramping up propaganda demanding that freedom of speech be abolished in America.  Ending free speech is, rather obviously, going to be a key policy of the coming Madam Clinton Regime.  But taking our guns was a key policy of the Obama Regime, and yet I have a legal but unregistered Kel-Tec 9 mm in each of my hands as I type this – so these fights can be won.

And the freedom of speech fight must be won.  Because we are the last White country with freedom of speech, the last place we can legally press these issues.  We need to be prepared to fight for our freedom when it comes under attack, and the vanguard attackers are not the government, but slick propaganda in the Jew media.

One such slick propaganda piece came across my desk today – an op-ed in Al-Jazeera by a radical drug-using terrorism-supporter named Malcolm Harris entitled “Americans Have Nothing to Learn from Nazis.” The piece forwards the idea that free speech must be crushed violently.

Hilarious and shocking is the premise of the article – he begins by praising violent acts of terrorism against gatherings of people he labels “Nazis,” then goes on to say that the reason Nazis must be silenced is that they could be violent. The thing goes into ultra-mind-boggler when you realize that Harris is a self-identifying “anarchist,” against the existence of the state. but he wants to use the state to shut down people’s right to free thought and expression.

Darkness falls on the Western soul.

Harris begins:

On Jan. 22, Jason Hammond accepted a noncooperating plea deal from prosecutors in Cook County, Illinois: He will serve 41 months for his role in an organized assault on a casual dining establishment in the Chicago suburb of Tinley Park. On May 19, 2012, Hammond and 17 others stormed the Ashford House restaurant with bats and hammers, interrupting lunch and leaving 10 people injured. But instead of years in jail, America should perhaps consider sending Hammond a thank-you card.

Now, presumably, when you read that last line there you expect that later in the article, Harris is going to explain to us why we should send this terrorist a thank-you card. Spoiler alert: that never happens.

Jason Hammond was part of an anti-racist terrorist attack on the Illinois European Heritage Association, which the lunatic Harris refers to as a “Neo-Nazi” organization.

Here’s a local news report about the incident:

Here is the video tape of the attack itself:

That event, right there, is what this man is claiming is a heroic act to be celebrated: a gang of masked men in their twenties rushing a bunch of old guys sitting around at a restaurant and beating them with hammers. Let that sink in for a second.

This attack, I am certain, is bigger than any organized act of violence that Nazis have engaged in since the fall of the Third Reich.

Harris then goes on to praise “antifa” groups for their long history of using violence and coercion to silence people who disagree with their beliefs.

White supremacists have found a comfy home on Stormfront and other Internet forums, but a real movement requires in-person meetings. The Jason Hammonds of the world have made this very difficult for them. Whenever "race realists" plan to gather in public, the standard antifa operating procedure is to call the venues, inform them that the "heritage" groups they're planning to host are actually bunches of neo-Nazis and give them the chance to cancel. Larger companies usually do; the 2010 American Renaissance national conference, for example, was forced out of the Sheraton and into a strip mall Bertucci's. When venues agree to host despite the warning, antifascists find other ways to put a halt to white supremacist organizing.

Because of their militant tactics, antifa associations also end up doing a lot of prisoner support. Five other participants in the Tinley Park action agreed to similar pleas in January 2013, and all are now out on parole. When push comes to shove, the police are always willing to defend neo-Nazis in suits from anarchists in hoodies. You can host a fascist meet-up, but God forbid you try to stop it by breaking a window.

What derangement are we dealing with here – “how dare the cops side with people chatting peacefully, rather than the terrorists trying to strip them of their basic human rights of free association and speech”?

Following his open praise of violent acts of terrorism by people who believe the government shouldn’t exist, he goes on to explain why the government needs to silence people’s free speech in order to prevent violence.

American liberalism prides itself on making space available for all, including white supremacists, as in the 1969 Supreme Court decision Brandenburg v. Ohio, which affirmed the Klan's right to rally on public streets. But when liberalism protects white nationalists against those who seek to disrupt their vile, anti-liberal activities, what does our system hope to gain?

The ostensible reason for this free speech for extremism is to keep the marketplace of ideas open. Any restrictions on the peaceful exchange of words leads to a chilling effect, and when we're afraid to say what we think, the best ideas might die on cold tongues. Recent American history — especially the parts we're proud of — is filled with unpopular ideas whose advocates struggled their way into the status quo. As prominent civil libertarian Cass Sunstein writes of free speech in his book "Why Societies Need Dissent," "Better outcomes can be expected from any system that creates incentives for individuals to reveal information to the group."

But liberals are making a category error: White supremacy isn't a source of information; it's among the most dangerous lies ever conceived. White nationalism has no kernel of truth for us to unearth through discussion and debate. In the marketplace of ideas, it's strawberry-flavored rat poison. Fascism has nothing to offer, and we have zilch to gain from hearing out fascists. We may, however, have a lot to lose.

There's no such thing as nonviolent Nazis. Their only role in a free society is planning to overthrow it. Liberalism asks that we treat speech the way the government does, remaining agnostic with regard to its content as long as it doesn't incite imminent lawless action. The liberal argument goes that the answer to bad speech isn't censorship or force but better speech. No matter that white nationalists are using the Constitution as cover to organize against the document's declared values; the rules still protect them. There's a lot of self-satisfaction in this pose, but it's staggeringly vulnerable. Neo-Nazis pursuing an entryist strategy join the military and other state institutions, gaining access to training and recruitment opportunities and biding their time. In the event of social upheaval, white nationalists plan to be prepared.

There's no liberty to be gained by dancing the public-sphere polka with white nationalists, whether they're wearing loafers or jackboots. Anti-fascists like Jason Hammond don't blind themselves to history or bind their hands with liberal tolerance. They know that now, as before, the swastika belongs under a hammer. As fascist elements organize, the violence required to confront and marginalize them only increases. As the antifa group One People's Project puts it, "Hate has consequences." Better to fight now.

This is what we are dealing with.

I will note here that Elizabeth Brown at the Libertarian magazine Reason mentioned Harris’ piece in a piece she did defending free speech, and Harris whined that “oh, I wasn’t arguing for hate-speech laws, I was merely arguing for terrorist acts of violence.”

More of this conversation here.

More of this conversation here.

I don’t think that is what is said in his article, as he clearly cites legal precedents and then says why he disagrees with them, directly implying that he does believe the law should be different than it is. I think he just realized how absolutely retarded it was to be an anarchist arguing that the government take away more freedoms when he was called out, so then backtracked and claimed he’d been misunderstood.

One thing he does do for certain is openly support all different types of terrorism, making it hilarious that a Moslem-owned magazine published his article.

His Twitter feed is filled with endless promotion of drug use and insane calls for acts of violence. Here this lunatic is talking about “targeting” district attorneys in a Tweet from a few hours ago:

Imagine if a right-winger said we should "target" government lawyers.

Imagine if a right-winger said we should “target” government lawyers.

Note: Yes, Malcolm Harris is a particularly ridiculous example of an anti-free speech activist, given that he advocates violence against non-violent individuals who he suspects without reason may commit violence, but these are the same basic arguments used by the mainstream movement against speech – the idea that “hate” leads to violence and so violence must be used against them first.

Operation: Fight Me, You Faggot

I trust, brothers, that you understand the seriousness of what we are dealing with here.

It is clear that some sort of action needs to be taken against the homo, and that needed action is clear: demand that this advocate of the use of violence to silence speech meet the belt-holding champion of free speech, prominent pacifist and publisher of the Daily Stormer, Andrew Anglin, in a Wal-Mart parking lot at night for a bare-knuckles boxing match.

This will be called “Operation: Fight Me, You Faggot.”

Because I think it is less than probable this ballsless metro-fag has the balls to meet in a parking lot for a final showdown, I have a second option: he can defend his beliefs in the octagon of the mind: we can have a debate on a radio network of his choosing.

You can make either or both demands on his Twitter @BigMeanInternet.  You can also visit his website, The New Inquiry, and post comments, or email him at malcolmpharris@gmail.com.

Beyond this, I would think we should be able to demand a response from Al-Jazeera as to why they are openly endorsing violent acts of terrorism.

A letter, for example this:

To Whom It May Concern,

I was highly disturbed to find that you are openly endorsing acts of violent terrorism for political ends by publishing a recent op-ed piece from Malcolm Harris entitled “America has Nothing to Learn from Nazis.”

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/2/americans-have-nothing-to-learn-from-nazis.html

In this op-ed, Harris explicitly calls for acts of terrorism, citing one incident where multiple civilians eating at a restaurant were beaten with hammers by a gang as a heroic act.

I understand that you do not necessarily endorse opinions in opinion pieces, but surely you understand that in many Western countries this content is illegal under incitement to violence legislation, and what’s more, by publishing material encouraging acts of terrorism, you are not defending a right to opinion but putting lives at risk. Should someone follow the advice published in your column and carry out acts of terrorism, you will have blood on your hands and I do hope you are held legally responsible.

Please explain to me and your readers why it is you believe you have a right, as a foreign news entity, to promote terrorism in America.

Sincerely,
A Reader

or something you draw up yourself, can be sent to the following email addresses:

america@aljazeera.net, ajam.press@aljazeera.net, press.int@aljazeera.net, marketing.int@aljazeera.net, distribution.int@aljazeera.net, jcforstudies@aljazeera.net

I would also be interested in what the Federal Authorities of the United States have to say about why this man is on the loose and apparently openly planning terrorist attacks in Moslem-owned newspapers.

The only reason that our people get investigated over internet postings is that the SPLC and the ADL have teams of people watching our sites ready to pounce on any little slip up. Meanwhile, Harris can publicly call for terrorism on a major mainstream news site and nothing happens because no one reports it and the FBI isn’t scanning this material themselves.

Let’s turn their tactics back on them.

Here’s a letter to send to the government:

To Whom It May Concern,

I would like to bring to your attention a potential domestic terrorist.  Anarchist American Malcolm Harris, who I understand has been involved in acts of violence before, has published an article on the Arabic website Al-Jazeera which celebrates acts of terrorism and calls for more such acts to be committed against Americans he views as political enemies.

The article, entitled “America has Nothing to Learn from Nazis,” can be viewed here:

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/2/americans-have-nothing-to-learn-from-nazis.html

Here on Twitter Harris talks about advocating violence, endorsing a 2012 terrorist attack in Illinois as the type of act he wants to see more of:

https://twitter.com/enbrown/status/563345965743370240

and here he talks about “targeting” district attorneys:

https://twitter.com/BigMeanInternet/status/564167523047055360

It is clear that Malcolm Harris is a threat to the safety of the people of this country, and is in the process of publicly planning acts of terrorism.  I hope that the authorities of these United States will address this man before his words become actions and more innocent people are left hurt.

Thank You,
A Concerned Citizen

The FBI does not have an email, so this must be sent through this form. It only takes a minute, and your report will help prevent any more of our brothers suffering the type of violence you saw in the video above.

I would also encourage people to contact other mainstream “right-wing” news outlets with this information, see if they will do a report on it.

As Always – Spectacle!

Once again, this is a situation where spectacle is helpful. There can be no better posterchild for “anti-Nazism” and laws against free speech than this terrorist. He is the epitome of what all of these people are – belligerent, hate-filled lunatics intent on punishing anyone who dares question their entirely arbitrary value system.

So, we should make him known.

Understand this: This man, Malcolm Harris, is openly calling for each of us to be rushed by masked men and brutally beaten with hammers because he disagrees with our beliefs.

Understand this: This man, Malcolm Harris, is openly calling for each of us to be rushed by masked men and brutally beaten with hammers because he disagrees with our beliefs.

The importance of this cannot be overstated. This man has the intent on personally, physically harming each one of us in the short term, and in the long term erasing us from existence. Those are his stated goals.

So do your worst. Updates to come as things happen.

Hail Victory.
Andrew Anglin

Sydney: Jew Rabbi Says It Didn’t Know It Wasn’t Supposed to Touch Children’s Genitals

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 02:43 AM PST

Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

Chabad Rabbi Yosef Feldman

Chabad Rabbi Yosef Feldman

Jews are having more trouble in the land down under!

ABC:

A former director of an Orthodox Jewish school says he did not know it was a crime for an adult to touch a child’s genitals, the royal commission into child abuse has heard.

Rabbi Yosef Feldman was questioned about the way he dealt with abuse claims against a rabbinical student known as AVL at the Yeshivah Gedolah in Sydney in 2002.

Counsel assisting the Commission Maria Gerace asked: “did you understand that it was against the law for an adult to touch the genitals of another child?”

“I didn’t know that as a fact,” Rabbi Feldman answered.

The Commission heard AVL admitted lying down and massaging the child.

The rabbi said he “didn’t have a clue” that could be a criminal matter.

“My role in general is to look at things from a Jewish perspective, from a religious perspective,” Rabbi Feldman said.

“I’m not in the business of thinking about how society would deal with issues.”

In other words: “your goyim laws are so far below me I don’t even think about them. In our divine law given by our god, we are allowed to touch the genitals of children all we like.”

American Stupid: Bruce Jenner Decides He Wants to Become a Woman, Goes Out and Kills Someone with His Car

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 02:16 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

Bruce Jenner in better days

Bruce Jenner in better days

Bruce Jenner now.

Bruce Jenner now.

America is a country which relishes in decadent psychosis, often preferring redundant stupidity to pragmatic depravity.

Such was the case with running champion and reality TV star Bruce Jenner. Being a part of the Kim Kardashian spectacle and all that went along with that was not enough for him, and due to whatever sick reasoning drives him, he decided he was going to become a tranny.

Jenner allows his teenage daughters to have sex with African Negroes.

Jenner allows his teenage daughters to have sex with African Negroes.

The man is 65-years-old. Apparently, this is some deep-rooted desire a lot of men had, and now that it is becoming acceptable they are like “yes, finally I can be my true self – a woman!” Or, more likely than that, reality is collapsing in on itself and people are just behaving in completely deranged and nonsensical ways, especially in America, where this black hole of the collective consciousness of the human race is centered.

Anyway, not long after he told the world he was going to become a woman, he went out and killed someone in a car crash.  He wasn’t charged with anything, apparently it was an unavoidable accident.

Whoa dude!  Bummer!

Whoa dude! Bummer!

But it’s all a pretty weird story, huh?  Almost like something which really should not be happening, and yet it is, and no one is able to understand why it is.  In fact, no one is able to understand why it shouldn’t be happening, but it is generally accepted that it shouldn’t be.

Does it have something to do with the cellphones, maybe?  Like using them all the time is warping reality in some way?  Or is it just an accumulation of everything at once, that at some point, reality slipped away and we just didn’t even notice it was gone?

By the way, did you guys here that the United States of America now has a Negro President from Kenya, and no one is bothering to complain about it, or even thinks it’s weird?

Is there anyway to return to reality, or should we just roll with it?

Italian Senate Rules It’s Not Racist to Call a Black Woman an “Orangutan”

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 12:30 AM PST

Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

Cecile Kyenge

Cecile Kyenge

An oranutan

An orangutan

It was not racist when Italy’s deputy Senate president described the Black minister as an “orangutan,” senators have decided.

As calling a Black person an ape is absolutely racist by anyone’s definition of the word, it seems to me that this senate ruling is not commenting on the insult itself, but on the orangutan herself. They are saying “seriously, why are you here? Why don’t you stop whining and go back to Africa? We don’t want you here.”

The Local:

Roberto Calderoli sparked outrage in July 2013 with his comments about Cecile Kyenge, then Italy's integration minister:

He said: "When I see Kyenge I can't help but think of an orangutan."

A member of the far-right Northern League (Lega Nord) party, Calderoli refused a call from Italy's sitting prime minister, Enrico Letta, to step down and the deputy senate president has remained in his post ever since.

His "I'm not racist" position has now won the backing of senators, who ruled that the orangutan comment does not amount to racial hate.

The move was supported by Kyenge's Democratic Party (PD), with only the Five Star Movement (M5S) opposing, La Repubblica reported on Friday.

Kyenge, who lost her ministerial position when Matteo Renzi became premier a year ago, said she was "surprised" and "sad" about the ruling.

While she had forgiven Calderoli for the slur, Kyenge worried about the broader impact of the Senate decision: "If a person who represents the institutions can insult anybody, I ask: who protects the weak [members of society] in this country? It's creating a very dangerous precedent."

Wait. You come here to get free everything, then it is our duty to protect your feelings? How does that work, exactly?

Morbidly Obese Women Demand They be Considered Sexually Attractive

Posted: 08 Feb 2015 12:16 AM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

Tess Holliday: The patriarchy said she needed to lose weight, but she knew better.

Tess Holliday: The patriarchy said she needed to lose weight, but she knew better.

At first, the only invincible bodies in the politically correct spectrum were Negroes and women.  They were born as they were, and couldn’t help it, so aspects of the system must be changed to help them deal with these conditions of birth.  Then in the 90s, homosexuality became something you were born with, and so civil rights began to apply to homos.  Then at some point – I don’t really have any idea when it was – fatness stopped being something you could condemn people for, and instead seemed to reached the status of anal-fetishism – “don’t make fun of her for being fat, she can’t help it.”

Now, fat women are literally claiming they are somehow beautiful and demanding that the world accept them as such.  This follows of course only follows logically from the initial feminist claim of “I am entitled to everything while responsible for nothing.”

These cows have created a movement they call “body positive” which encourages women to not be ashamed of the utter and complete lack of self-control that obesity necessarily implies, and instead just feel good about their disgusting shapes.  I guess the Prozac must be playing some crucial role here.

What they claim is that female physical attractiveness is not based on biological responses in the male to fertility triggers, but is instead just made up arbitrarily, mainly for the purpose of hurting their feelings.  If you want to get an idea of the way they view the world, flip through a few of these pro-fat blogs.

Dear cows: Elle remains the fairest one of all.

Dear cows: Elle remains the fairest one of all.

Also, Taylor Swift: Because objective reality is a thing.

Also, Taylor Swift: Because objective reality is a thing.

One of the spokeswomen of this movement is plus-size model Tess Holliday, who is a ghastly size 24 – that is, she is morbidly obese, such as is dangerous to her health. But what matters is that she feels she is beautiful, and has no obligation to learn self-control in order to meet objective standards of physical attractiveness. Because, after all, objectivity was always just a conspiracy of the Patriarchy designed to oppress women.

Here is a segment on Tess’ modelling contract from Channel 4 (have vomit bag ready).

And here is an interview. This is particularly insane, as she and the interviewer talk about how it is a social justice agenda to convince people fat is beautiful.

Social justice does not have an end point in sight. The Marxist idea is that all which is superior must succumb to that which is inferior, and so of course you must say that there is no objective beauty, and a 30-year-old cow is just as attractive as a thin nubile.

So, what comes after fat women are actually beautiful?

The obvious thing is that retarded people are actually really smart.  The logistics of that are going to be difficult, but I’m sure they’ll figure out a way to pull it off.

I can see the Channel 4 segment now:

Typically when you think of a graduate student of neurobiology at MIT, you do not think of a Down Syndrome sufferer with the mental age of 4.  But Johnny Jones is changing all of that, and a new movement has emerged to cast off old stereotypes which claim that people with Down Syndrome are less intelligent than people without Down Syndrome.

“I is smart boy, very smart boy, mommy say I is very smart as everyone.  Huhhhhhuhhhhh.  I do a good learn, make happy happy time, everyone feel happy in school time huuuuuhhh.” Johnny told me.

And Dr. Jacob Silverwitz agrees: “there is simply no solid evidence to suggest that people with Down Syndrome are less intelligent than people without Down Syndrome.  It is a nagging cultural bias left over from the patriarchy, slavery, the Holocaust, Jim Crow, colonialism and White privilege.”

Hungary: Jobbik Says They’re the Second Biggest Party

Posted: 07 Feb 2015 11:46 PM PST

Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

Jobbik Leader Gábor Vona

Jobbik Leader Gábor Vona

Jobbik is now claiming to be the second biggest party in Hungary. This isn’t so much a claim as it is a fact, given their having placed second in the last election cycle.

Budapest Times:

Radical nationalist Jobbik has by now become the second strongest party in Hungary and "this tendency is growing," the leader of the party said on Monday, after a party board meeting. Disputes are "raging" within ruling Fidesz, Gábor Vona told a press conference, while the political left has completely fallen apart.

In their stead, Jobbik has become the most stable political force, he insisted. In connection with the upcoming by-election for a vacated parliamentary seat in Veszprém on 22 February, he said that although the city was a Fidesz "stronghold", he was optimistic Jobbik would prevail.

The by-election will be held for taking up the parliamentary mandate of Tibor Navracsics, of the ruling Fidesz party, who became EU commissioner in October 2014. On the other by-election set for 12 April in the Tapolca ward in Veszprém County, Vona said that constituency is "an exciting battlefield" where the race was wide open.

Vona said there was "thirst for peace in Hungary" and the response to that is a well-defined programme offered by a "composed force."

The question now is, how much have they or will they compromise, ideologically, in order to make the distance between second and first party?  Hopefully not much.

Buzzfeed Jew Discovers Le Happy Merchant

Posted: 07 Feb 2015 11:26 PM PST

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

Hm

Hm

A Jew named Bernstein who writes for Buzzfeed has written an entirely crappy article about Le Happy Merchant.  I am continually shocked not so much by the ridiculous content of these mainstream Jew websites, but by the low quality of the writing itself.

Everyone knows it is the best picture ever.

Everyone knows it is the best picture ever.

For whatever reason, the Jew Bernstein does not identify Le Happy Merchant as Le Happy Merchant, but instead calls him “Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif.”  He also claims “we” (unclear if he means the Jews, the Buzzfeed staff or if he refers to his own person as “we”) found the man who drew it, while in actual physical reality (as opposed to the Jew fantasy world), /pol/ figured out A. Wyatt Mann was Nick Bougas like four years ago.

He begins by mourning the reality of meme culture.

What is most significant about this image isn't the thing itself — there is far more creative, and far more disturbing, anti-Jewish imagery out there — but its sheer ubiquity. A Google reverse image search for "Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif," as the file is most frequently, but not always, named, returns 1,210 matches. It's unquestionably the most popular anti-Semitic image on the internet, and if one pauses to think about the scope and reach of the internet, it's easy to make an argument that "Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif" is the most widely seen anti-Semitic image in history.

So where did it come from, and how is it used?

The drawing has become a mainstay not just of the internet presence of political causes that are sometimes or usually anti-Semitic in their rhetoric, but an established unit in the set of images that comprises the visual language of Reddit, and 4chan, and dozens of other internet fora. And just like every other unit in this set, from photographs and GIFs we find hilarious and adorable to those we find offensive and disgusting, it exists not just as a single image but as a template, a base model for more ornate iterations.

Indeed, the modifications of Jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif are endless.

He does not attempt to explain why so many people hate the Jews and thus desire to mock them with this image. In fact, he spins it that “maybe they don’t really hate us” and “it’s just for shock value.”

Then the dumb Jew has to call up USHMM to find out if the picture was personally drawn by Adolf Hitler himself.

According to Judith Cohen, the chief photo archivist for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the image isn't a Nazi Party caricature at all, though it does clearly bear the influence of Philipp Ruprecht, the Stürmer cartoonist who was sentenced to six years of hard labor after World War II for his work.

The rest of the stupid and boring article is just him going through making know-nothings think he is the World’s Greatest Jew Detective for having discovered Nick Bougas drew the Merchant, when the only detective work he would have had to do is go on /pol/ and ask someone, since everyone there has known this for years.

Funnily enough, he makes a point to go into Bougas’ motivations, deciding that most likely he was just a counter-culture guy opposed to political correctness, who didn’t really hate the Jews and want to see them rounded up and shipped to some gigantic concentration camp somewhere in Africa or Antarctica.

Nick Bougas, Patton Oswalt and Jim Goad

Nick Bougas, Patton Oswalt and Jim Goad

This is a theme I’m seeing more and more with these Jews.  Instead of pushing this “oy vey, we’re victims, everyone hates us and is trying to turn us into lampshades” business, they are opting instead for a “nah, people don’t really hate us, they just give us a hard time for laughs” approach.

If I had to guess, I would assert that we are witnessing the Jewish hive-mind catch on to the reality that when people hear of others hating the Jews they are no longer saying “oh you poor dear!  I’ll help you stop them from making you into a lampshade!”  And instead saying “yeah, all of these people do hate you, merchant.  I’m thinking that with so many people across the planet hating you, they probably have a reason.  What did you do?”

Nigel: Race was an Issue at Rotherham

Posted: 07 Feb 2015 11:02 PM PST

Daily Stormer
February 8, 2015

In an interview apparently filmed when Nigel was locked in the Rotherham UKIP shop by hordes of pro-child-rape advocates protesting against him, this Channel four woman comes at him, using an unconfirmed conversation with an alleged victim of the Paki kiddie-fiddling brigade against him, saying that this raped girl “doesn’t want race to be an issue.”

Nigel quite frankly explains that regardless of what anyone wants, thinks or feels, race is an issue in this situation.  He notes that this is “an accepted fact.”

No comments: